Words and Sacraments

by Helen Colwell Adams

Whose pulpit?

September 26th, 2008 4:42 pm · 3 comments

The countdown is under way to the Sept. 28 “Pulpit Freedom Sunday,” in which pastors are being encouraged to flout IRS rules against preaching about candidates:

The Alliance Defense Fund announced the initiative last May as a way to challenge IRS rules that date to 1954. ADF spokesman Greg Scott said the organization contacted “pastors, priests and rabbis from every major denomination,” and knows of 33 clergy in 23 states who intend to take part on Sunday.

At least one clergyman who was contacted joined in filing a complaint against the initiative with the IRS.

“We’re basically aiming to get these rules declared unconstitutional so that pastors have the right to speak freely from the pulpit without fear of punishment,” said Dale Schowengerdt, legal counsel for the ADF.

He said his group is not telling pastors what to say, or whether to endorse specific candidates, but stands ready to support them if complaints are filed against them.

Personally, I wouldn’t. There is nothing now to prevent pastors from preaching about issues without fear of losing tax-exempt status … and my own view is that if you want the freedom to endorse candidates, you can do so easily by giving up that 501(c)3 status. That’s the problem with government benefits …. including tax exemption …. they always come with strings attached.

(FYI, the quotes are from a Religion News Service story, but it’s not available without subscription.)

Here’s another tidbit to chew on:

Over half of Americans believe churches that publicly endorse candidates for public office should lose their tax exemption, a recent study shows.

According to LifeWay Research, the research arm of LifeWay Christian Resources of the Southern Baptist Convention, 38 percent of all surveyed Americans said they strongly agree with that statement and 14 percent said they somewhat agree. Meanwhile, 25 percent strongly disagree with churches losing their tax-exempt status and 17 percent somewhat disagree.

Results from the survey, conducted in June 2008 on more than 1,200 adults, were released days before pastors across the country are scheduled to preach from their pulpits this coming Sunday about the moral qualifications of candidates seeking political office.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  3 comments  Tags: Uncategorized

There are currently 3 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
dragonrider
9/26/08
11:03 PM
QUOTE (Lancaster Online @ Sep 26 2008, 05:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
I agree that any church that endorses candidates should lose tax exempt status but I go further I see no reason for tax exempt status now. Too many pastors of mega churches are using the church as a make me rich scheme this needs to stop.
AngelFace
9/26/08
11:13 PM
QUOTE (dragonrider @ Sep 26 2008, 11:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree that any church that endorses candidates should lose tax exempt status but I go further I see no reason for tax exempt status now. Too many pastors of mega churches are using the church as a make me rich scheme this needs to stop.



Should colleges and universities lose their tax exemption when professors openly endorse one candidate and mock the other, and penalize the students that do not agree with him?
dragonrider
9/26/08
11:15 PM
QUOTE (AngelFace @ Sep 27 2008, 12:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Should colleges and universities lose their tax exemption when professors openly endorse one candidate and mock the other, and penalize the students that do not agree with him?
Sure why not, sure would help Lancasters budget if the colleges were paying taxes.
View Topic | Comment on this blog