The siren song of Rush

October 2nd, 2009 11:42 am · 13 comments

I know: Ew.

But David Brooks makes some excellent points in how Democrats -but also and more importantly, Republicans - kowtow to Rush and Beck and O’Reilly:

They pay more attention to Rush’s imaginary millions than to the real voters down the street. The Republican Party is unpopular because it’s more interested in pleasing Rush’s ghosts than actual people. The party is leaderless right now because nobody has the guts to step outside the rigid parameters enforced by the radio jocks and create a new party identity. The party is losing because it has adopted a radio entertainer’s niche-building strategy, while abandoning the politician’s coalition-building strategy.

The rise of Beck, Hannity, Bill O’Reilly and the rest has correlated almost perfectly with the decline of the G.O.P. But it’s not because the talk jocks have real power. It’s because they have illusory power, because Republicans hear the media mythology and fall for it every time.

Emphasis added, but it’s a very interesting point. “Monk” over on USA network has more viewers than Beck. But we don’t pretend Tony Shaloub is influencing the discourse.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  13 comments  Tags: Glenn Beck · Rush · Republican Party

There are currently 13 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
knowntome
10/2/09
1:32 PM
wow, so that means that all those million plus people at the Capitol for the 912 rally the other week were imaginary ghosts ?
that Rush has amazing powers !
Bouquet
10/2/09
1:49 PM
QUOTE (knowntome @ Oct 2 2009, 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
wow, so that means that all those million plus people at the Capitol for the 912 rally the other week were imaginary ghosts ?


...well 930,000 of them were.
clanker
10/2/09
1:54 PM
Just how many people attended Saturday's 9/12 tea-party protest? Estimates by conservatives range from the hundreds of thousands to the millions -- numbers they say indicate a growing anti-Obama grassroots movement. Unsurprisingly, liberal pundits are pushing back, saying protesters came out in the tens of thousands. So far, the debate is hinging on photos of the rally, which appear to show the National Mall packed from the Capitol to the Washington Monument, 16 blocks away. A National Park Service map pegged to the 2008 inauguration appears to show that the Mall holds about a million people. Bloggers have overlaid the map with photos from Saturday. Case closed, right? Not so, as there's an important detail both conservatives and liberals are ignoring.


What no one has noted is that two-thirds of the National Mall was filled by an entirely separate event on Saturday that had nothing to do with protesting the president. September 12 just happened to be the 24th-annual Black Family Reunion, which ran from 7th Street all the way to the Washington Monument. I spent several hours on the Mall on Saturday, and there's no question that protesters numbered at least in the tens of thousands, but they were isolated to only a fraction of the area they're credited with having filled. The Black Family Reunion, a peaceful and friendly event designed around "healing and uplifting black families," featured mild-mannered African American families meandering through a series of promotional tables and large white tents scattered across the Mall. One crowd gathered across from the Washington Monument, not to protest health-care reform but to enjoy a Christian-themed R&B concert, where volunteers handed out free water bottles and bananas.

Not even the most biased observer could have mistaken these people for anti-Obama protesters. So why did so many pundits conflate the cheery Black Family Reunion with the angry tea-party protesters? The answer, I think, is that they either weren't there or didn't bother to leave the protest's zenith on the Capitol steps. It's an institutional hazard of covering protests that reporters seek out the center of the action and don't budge, giving them great anecdotes from individual attendees but little sense of the event's overall scope. Similarly, it's easy for bloggers to just read after-action reports or browse a few photos before drawing conclusions. But these are both risky strategies for covering big events, and it's easy to see why people are so confused about Saturday's attendance figures.
grieker
10/2/09
2:17 PM
QUOTE (clanker @ Oct 2 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just how many people attended Saturday's 9/12 tea-party protest? Estimates by conservatives range from the hundreds of thousands to the millions -- numbers they say indicate a growing anti-Obama grassroots movement. Unsurprisingly, liberal pundits are pushing back, saying protesters came out in the tens of thousands. So far, the debate is hinging on photos of the rally, which appear to show the National Mall packed from the Capitol to the Washington Monument, 16 blocks away. A National Park Service map pegged to the 2008 inauguration appears to show that the Mall holds about a million people. Bloggers have overlaid the map with photos from Saturday. Case closed, right? Not so, as there's an important detail both conservatives and liberals are ignoring.


What no one has noted is that two-thirds of the National Mall was filled by an entirely separate event on Saturday that had nothing to do with protesting the president. September 12 just happened to be the 24th-annual Black Family Reunion, which ran from 7th Street all the way to the Washington Monument. I spent several hours on the Mall on Saturday, and there's no question that protesters numbered at least in the tens of thousands, but they were isolated to only a fraction of the area they're credited with having filled. The Black Family Reunion, a peaceful and friendly event designed around "healing and uplifting black families," featured mild-mannered African American families meandering through a series of promotional tables and large white tents scattered across the Mall. One crowd gathered across from the Washington Monument, not to protest health-care reform but to enjoy a Christian-themed R&B concert, where volunteers handed out free water bottles and bananas.

Not even the most biased observer could have mistaken these people for anti-Obama protesters. So why did so many pundits conflate the cheery Black Family Reunion with the angry tea-party protesters? The answer, I think, is that they either weren't there or didn't bother to leave the protest's zenith on the Capitol steps. It's an institutional hazard of covering protests that reporters seek out the center of the action and don't budge, giving them great anecdotes from individual attendees but little sense of the event's overall scope. Similarly, it's easy for bloggers to just read after-action reports or browse a few photos before drawing conclusions. But these are both risky strategies for covering big events, and it's easy to see why people are so confused about Saturday's attendance figures.


It wasn't an anti Obama protest.

As much as you would like it to be.



Being anti Obama would be racist.


clanker
10/2/09
2:23 PM
QUOTE (grieker @ Oct 2 2009, 02:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It wasn't an anti Obama protest.

As much as you would like it to be.



Being anti Obama would be racist.



Sorry, I should have included the credit. It's a cut and paste from an article in Atlantic Magazine. The main point is the estimates for attendance.
knowntome
10/2/09
2:30 PM
Double wow !
what I'm seeing now, after reading your posts, is that the quote from "Dana Bana" was actually David Barna
and he was talking not about 9/12, but about the Obama inauguration ?
man, I have about a million emails to rescind, lol
knowntome
10/2/09
2:39 PM
QUOTE (clanker @ Oct 2 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just how many people attended Saturday's 9/12 tea-party protest? Estimates by conservatives range from the hundreds of thousands to the millions -- numbers they say indicate a growing anti-Obama grassroots movement. Unsurprisingly, liberal pundits are pushing back, saying protesters came out in the tens of thousands. So far, the debate is hinging on photos of the rally, which appear to show the National Mall packed from the Capitol to the Washington Monument, 16 blocks away. A National Park Service map pegged to the 2008 inauguration appears to show that the Mall holds about a million people. Bloggers have overlaid the map with photos from Saturday. Case closed, right? Not so, as there's an important detail both conservatives and liberals are ignoring.


What no one has noted is that two-thirds of the National Mall was filled by an entirely separate event on Saturday that had nothing to do with protesting the president. September 12 just happened to be the 24th-annual Black Family Reunion, which ran from 7th Street all the way to the Washington Monument. I spent several hours on the Mall on Saturday, and there's no question that protesters numbered at least in the tens of thousands, but they were isolated to only a fraction of the area they're credited with having filled. The Black Family Reunion, a peaceful and friendly event designed around "healing and uplifting black families," featured mild-mannered African American families meandering through a series of promotional tables and large white tents scattered across the Mall. One crowd gathered across from the Washington Monument, not to protest health-care reform but to enjoy a Christian-themed R&B concert, where volunteers handed out free water bottles and bananas.

Not even the most biased observer could have mistaken these people for anti-Obama protesters. So why did so many pundits conflate the cheery Black Family Reunion with the angry tea-party protesters? The answer, I think, is that they either weren't there or didn't bother to leave the protest's zenith on the Capitol steps. It's an institutional hazard of covering protests that reporters seek out the center of the action and don't budge, giving them great anecdotes from individual attendees but little sense of the event's overall scope. Similarly, it's easy for bloggers to just read after-action reports or browse a few photos before drawing conclusions. But these are both risky strategies for covering big events, and it's easy to see why people are so confused about Saturday's attendance figures.


Excellent job Clanker, thank you !
I may be a conservative, but that doesn't mean I can't handle the truth ! smile.gif
ReverendAlobar
10/2/09
2:59 PM
TONY SHALHOUB IS A COMMIE!!!!
MONK IS A MARXIST!!!!
THE USA NETWORK IS UNAMERICAN!!!!
I DEMAND TO SEE TONY SHALHOUB'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE!!!!
HE'S AN ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT!!!! I SAW IT ON "WINGS"!!!!
Bigmaclender2
10/2/09
4:05 PM
QUOTE (grieker @ Oct 2 2009, 02:17 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It wasn't an anti Obama protest.

As much as you would like it to be.



Being anti Obama would be racist.


Please tell me that you're being sarcastic, lol.
Artie See
10/2/09
9:52 PM
QUOTE (Lancaster Online @ Oct 2 2009, 11:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The siren song of Rush

Most fire trucks, police cars, and ambulances have far better sirens than Limbaugh.
grieker
10/4/09
4:31 PM
QUOTE (Bigmaclender2 @ Oct 2 2009, 04:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Please tell me that you're being sarcastic, lol.



I have yet to find the sarcaism icon.

I am being sarcastic about the "race" bit.
Alexander
10/4/09
4:45 PM
sarcasm.gif
QUOTE (grieker @ Oct 4 2009, 05:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have yet to find the sarcaism icon.

I am being sarcastic about the "race" bit.


Here is is. sarcasm.gif
It's colonsarcasmcolon
wrsny337
10/4/09
4:57 PM
QUOTE (clanker @ Oct 2 2009, 01:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Just how many people attended Saturday's 9/12 tea-party protest? Estimates by conservatives range from the hundreds of thousands to the millions -- numbers they say indicate a growing anti-Obama grassroots movement. Unsurprisingly, liberal pundits are pushing back, saying protesters came out in the tens of thousands. So far, the debate is hinging on photos of the rally, which appear to show the National Mall packed from the Capitol to the Washington Monument, 16 blocks away. A National Park Service map pegged to the 2008 inauguration appears to show that the Mall holds about a million people. Bloggers have overlaid the map with photos from Saturday. Case closed, right? Not so, as there's an important detail both conservatives and liberals are ignoring . . .

Where these Fox New photos obtained via CNN footage? wink.gif If conservatives estimate hundreds of thousands to millions, they are more dilusional than I thought. I've seen the pictures (via CNN); looked more like 10-20 thousand . . . tops. Did I mention that the pictures were via CNN? laugh.gif
View Topic | Comment on this blog