Sneering at Cronkite
July 18th, 2009 6:40 pm · 5 comments
Interesting watching the tributes to Cronkite today - entirely justified, in my view. But with all the fawning, it’s easy to forget that Cronkite was at the height of his prominence/influence at the very time moment conservatives were developing their “liberal media” strategy - bashing the media as somehow unrepresentative of middle America, endorsing and enabling bad behavior.
The sneers at the “liberal media” were sneers at Cronkite.
Consider this, one of the most famous Cronkite moments:
This famously prompted LBJ to say that if he’d lost Cronkite, he’d lost Middle America.
But consider, just consider, the reaction had someone like Brian Williams said anything remotely like this about Iraq. The right would have been in full-throated howl at the “bias”; and imagine if the contemporary right existed back in 1968.
Why does Walter Cronkite hate the troops? Why does Walter Cronkite hate America?
So this bit about how the country loved Cronkite - well, some did. But I’m pretty sure some hated him and hated what he stood for. And, in fact, still do.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: Media
There are currently 5 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this blogBustina di tè 7/18/09 8:53 PM | What was it called? The 11:00 war? Every night America got to see the death and carnage of the previous day's fighting. Sure the hawks (both Dems and republicans) hated him but America viewed him through the lens of reality. The attacks on the "liberal" media came later in response to Watergate. If you follow Bob Somerby you know the media is anything but liberal. Also read The Hunting of the President and Fools for a Scandal. Compare Walter Cronkite or Ed Murrow to a Chris Matthews or a Kieth Olbermann two are journalists and two are shills for who ever pays the most. |
charlie_crystle 7/18/09 10:24 PM | What was it called? The 11:00 war? Every night America got to see the death and carnage of the previous day's fighting. Sure the hawks (both Dems and republicans) hated him but America viewed him through the lens of reality. The attacks on the "liberal" media came later in response to Watergate. If you follow Bob Somerby you know the media is anything but liberal. Also read The Hunting of the President and Fools for a Scandal. Compare Walter Cronkite or Ed Murrow to a Chris Matthews or a Kieth Olbermann two are journalists and two are shills for who ever pays the most.
More than 50% of editors are conservative, and most ownership is corporate conservative (vs corporate liberal). And you are owned by a family that made its wealth from destroying mountaintops, streams, and air quality in West Virgnia for coal.
But yes, he clearly hated freedom by todays' FoxNews standards. |
gsmart 7/19/09 12:32 AM | What was it called? The 11:00 war? Every night America got to see the death and carnage of the previous day's fighting.
Not only that, every night Americans got to see the protests - Vietnam, student takeovers, etc. - and began to think that the media coverage of the events was helping to trigger more of them. That was another key assumption of the "liberal media" strategy. |
Paul Sweedlepipe 7/19/09 9:30 AM | Gil, he called the war unwinnable after the Tet offensive, which was a castrostrophic loss for the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong. Tactically, the US was in the best position of the decade long conflict for victory. Many credit that statement with being the turning point in public opinion because he was so trusted. Please refer to the what the Vietnamese military leadership from that time has said about it. They were teetering on collapse. The fact is he was wrong the war was winnable, if there would have been continued public support. You are right, he was a great journalist, but perhaps we should blame him for begining this whole notion that a journalists should just write biased editorials (like you) rather than reporting the truth in an unbiased fashion so that people can form their own opinions. Also, Brian Wilson never said that about Iraq (he would have been wrong too, by the way), but lets not forget the current majority leader of the Senate did, which is even more pathetic. |
Bustina di tè 7/21/09 10:53 AM | Not quite. Tet was a surprise to the American public after months of the Johnson administration telling us the we were winning and the VC were on the ropes. All during 1967 the tide was turning against the war. Tet was one more nail in the coffin. |
View Topic | Comment on this blog