Note what Bill’O here does not say:

Anarchy and vigilantism is bad for society. Once the law breaks down society is finished.

And that’s the basis upon which O’Reilly thinks Americans should condemn Tiller’s murder. Not that murdering of an adult individual - versus the fetuses O’Reilly so carefully tallies up - could in and of itelf be wrong. Oh no.

So follow his thinking. The killing of Tiller was against the law, and bad for that reason.

But was it immoral?

Or - on the basis of the “evidence” O’Reilly so carefully lays out, yet again - was it justifiable homicide?