Not part of the job description

January 21st, 2009 10:23 am · 3 comments

A letter in the mail this morning:

Here is one of President Bush’s most important accomplishments. Because of the horrible war in the Middle East, missionaries were able to get in and begin planting churches. …

<snip>

According to the scrpitures we were put here on this earth to spread the “gospel.” President Bush has made this possible and many are being saved and are very thankful.

Man might not be happy with Bush but I’m sure our Heavenly Father has noticed.

Whew. Where to start.

When did it become the job of the President of the United States to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ across the globe?

I realize this is a relatively marginal sentiment (though here in Lancaster County it isn’t that marginal); but it is a window into how a certain subset of American citizens think, and why some still supported Bush despite all that’s happened these past eight years.

If you, like this letter writer, believe that the single most important task of the American president is to spread the gospel - that it trumps issues of national security and war, the economy and the well-being of the people here at home - then of course you think Bush was a successful president.

But is it and should it be the job of the American president to spread the gospel of Jesus Christ, or to create conditions where it might be spread?

Or is that not part of his job description?

Do you see, now, why the “Christianists” (as Sullivan calls them) pose an inherent challenge, and maybe an inherent danger, to the well-being of the country?

When the economy matters less than spreading the gospel, botching the economy is no biggie. When devastating war offers the chance to spread the gospel - bring it on.

When spreading the gospel is the overriding imperative, anything can be excused - and God is still pleased.

Too bad God doesn’t vote. Or maybe he does affect the outcome of elections - just not in the way these folks think.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  3 comments  Tags: Bush Era · Religious conservatism

There are currently 3 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
clanker
1/21/09
10:20 AM
QUOTE (Lancaster Online @ Jan 21 2009, 09:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.



Our military presence in the Middle East is what spurred terrorist attacks in the first place. Trying to wedge Christianity in a predominantly Islamic region, that still has historic memory of the crusades is like adding insult to injury. The Christians that did exist in Iraq were driven out, thanks to our opening up the country to violence between sects. No good can come of it and will likely get alot of people killed.
eagle^eye
1/21/09
10:51 PM
Gil... just a couple things,

No where does this writer state this was Bush's goal and/or job..(to spread the gospel). It was a by product of removing a dictator. A similar thing happened when the Soviet Union fell...and I'm pretty sure Reagan didn't feel it was his job to spread the gospel. Nor does the writer even imply it was his single most important task, or that it trumps any of the current big issues our country currently faces (in the portions of their letter you list). I think you're reading into this a little and making generalizations about Christians. And if Christians pose an inherent danger to the country....do you also fall into the category of Christian with me? ...or are you an atheist?
dc
1/21/09
10:57 PM
QUOTE (clanker @ Jan 21 2009, 10:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Our military presence in the Middle East is what spurred terrorist attacks in the first place. Trying to wedge Christianity in a predominantly Islamic region, that still has historic memory of the crusades is like adding insult to injury. The Christians that did exist in Iraq were driven out, thanks to our opening up the country to violence between sects. No good can come of it and will likely get alot of people killed.
Your words seem to indicate that we have a military presence in the Middle East so that we can spread the religion of Christianity.....
View Topic | Comment on this blog