President Principles

November 13th, 2008 10:40 am · 2 comments

Hat tip: CS

The Bush Era is coming to a close with a resounding thud, and the 25 percenters - led by the 25 percenters in chief - still fail to see what the other 75 percent of America sees:

Nearing the bitter end of eight ruinous years in office, President Bush still won’t acknowledge a single substantive thing he did wrong. Asked if he had any regrets in a CNN interview yesterday, Bush copped to a few public-relations gaffes many years ago. His tone, however, was anything but apologetic. In fact, he seemed quite pleased with himself.

Why not? To steal a line from P.J. O’Rourke, conservatives tell us that government doesn’t work - then, once elected, they prove it.

Bush did at least express some remorse over his “cowboy rhetoric” - “dead or alive,” “bring ‘em on” and “mission accomplished.” I suspect the 25 percenters wouldn’t even give you this.

Bush: “I think a president who tries to be popular is a president who could fail the country. And I remind people popularity is fleeting. Principles are forever. And there’ve been times when I’ve been popular and times when I haven’t been popular. But the job of the president is to make good, tough decisions based upon solid principles that are etched in his soul. I know there’s this kind of preoccupation by some by popularity polls, but for me they’re just moments, they come and go. But what doesn’t change [is] what you believe and can you defend those beliefs.”

Here again - no recognition that he himself failed the country, “principles etched in his soul” and all.

We cannot expect the 25 percenters, including the 25 percenters in chief, to ever understand this. The principle of Teh Freedom! may be grand; the decision to invade a country halfway around the world that never attacked us with a half-baked plan for the post-invasion period was how this president put those “principles” into action.

“Principle” isn’t enough. You’ve got to be competent, and you’ve got to be smart. The 25 percenters have been neither - and now their failure is etched on our collective soul.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  2 comments  Tags: Bush Era

There are currently 2 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
navybrat18
11/13/08
10:58 PM
If popularity was all that mattered, then President Bush would not have gone into Iraq. His approval ratings were extremely high after 9/11. But he saw a threat in Iraq that could not be ignored any longer. Remember that Iraq had thumbed its nose at and was in violation of 17 UN resolutions, had a history of attacking its neighbors, and repeatedly shot at our planes that patrolled the no fly zones. Every intelligence agency in the world agreed that Iraq was pursuing WMDs. And the US Congress authorized the use of force, which amounted to a declaration of war. If we had not gone into Iraq and an Iraqi WMD went off in the US, you guys would have gone nuts saying he didn't do enough. It was a no win situation for the President. So go ahead and use 20/20 hindsight and 2nd guess every decision. But while you're at it maybe you should look back at the Clinton years when al Queda carried out multiple attacks against US interests around the world. During that time, the threat from al Queda continued to grow and was ignored. If al Queda had been confronted during the 90's, maybe 9/11 and the Iraq war would not have happened.
Freedom
11/13/08
11:04 PM
QUOTE (navybrat18 @ Nov 13 2008, 10:58 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
If popularity was all that mattered, then President Bush would not have gone into Iraq. His approval ratings were extremely high after 9/11. But he saw a threat in Iraq that could not be ignored any longer. Remember that Iraq had thumbed its nose at and was in violation of 17 UN resolutions, had a history of attacking its neighbors, and repeatedly shot at our planes that patrolled the no fly zones. Every intelligence agency in the world agreed that Iraq was pursuing WMDs. And the US Congress authorized the use of force, which amounted to a declaration of war. If we had not gone into Iraq and an Iraqi WMD went off in the US, you guys would have gone nuts saying he didn't do enough. It was a no win situation for the President. So go ahead and use 20/20 hindsight and 2nd guess every decision. But while you're at it maybe you should look back at the Clinton years when al Queda carried out multiple attacks against US interests around the world. During that time, the threat from al Queda continued to grow and was ignored. If al Queda had been confronted during the 90's, maybe 9/11 and the Iraq war would not have happened.


Save your breath. Gil has his head so far up his !profanity! he won't hear you. As for the 25% he is mumbling about....wasn't it 46 million who voted for "more of the same" as Gil the shill would have you believe. Obama won sure...there were 7 million more koolaid drinkers out there that fell for his claptrap socialism...At least I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage or gas for my car for the next 4 yrs....Hey Gil...I'm waiting on my Exxon Credit Card...

Have a great day!!!
View Topic | Comment on this blog