Loosing the beast

October 10th, 2008 1:34 pm · 4 comments

The right-wing mob rule business is now even getting air time on Fox News (if only through an Obama spokewoman - that is, for now).

This is the emerging story of the campaign, and rightly so. Today we have someone yelling “traitor!” about Obama at a McCain rally; the good Senator, of course, declined to correct his fervent partisan.

Let’s be crystal clear here. If in fact the right-wing mob mentality does explode into violence, there will be lots and lots of blame to go around. Hannity and Fox and the others that have stoked these hatreds will deserve a good portion of it. Sarah Palin will deserve a tremendous amount of the blame.

But the buck will stop with John McCain himself - war hero, “putting America first” by permitting his campaign to incite hatred and perhaps violence against other Americans. McCain talks a lot about honor, but unless he personally and specifically seeks to put a stop to this, it is the most dishonorable thing I’ve seen a campaign do in modern times.

His campaign at least recognizes this is happening:

John Weaver, McCain’s former top strategist, said top Republicans have a responsibility to temper this behavior.

“People need to understand, for moral reasons and the protection of our civil society, the differences with Sen. Obama are ideological, based on clear differences on policy and a lack of experience compared to Sen. McCain,” Weaver said. “And from a purely practical political vantage point, please find me a swing voter, an undecided independent, or a torn female voter that finds an angry mob mentality attractive.”

But by now it doesn’t matter. McCain has loosed the beast; and unless he specifically calls what Martin terms “visceral anger” back into its cage, that beast remains on the loose. And lemme tell you, if you think the partisans on the left side of the fence would simply let right-wing violence pass - I think you are very, very wrong.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  4 comments  Tags: Election 2008

There are currently 4 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
usedmeat
10/10/08
1:43 PM
Projection, Gil?
Who was behind "Recreate '68" threats to riot in Denver if Obama wasn't handed the nomination?

Then we have this:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/...bout_obama.html
QUOTE
Seven weeks before the 2008 presidential election, liberals are warning America that if Barack Obama loses, it is because Americans are racist. Of course, that this means that Democrats (and independents) are racist, since Republicans will vote Republican regardless of the race of the Democrat, is an irony apparently lost on the Democrats making these charges.
That an Obama loss will be due to racism is becoming as normative a liberal belief as "Bush Lied, People Died," a belief that has generated intense rage among many liberals. But "Obama lost because of white racism" will be even more enraging.

Who is stoking the fires of rage?
justplainjoe
10/10/08
2:01 PM
QUOTE (usedmeat @ Oct 10 2008, 02:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Projection, Gil?
Who was behind "Recreate '68" threats to riot in Denver if Obama wasn't handed the nomination?

Then we have this:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/...bout_obama.html

Who is stoking the fires of rage?


oh please...liberals are blah blah blah...is that all liberals or just a handful? is there a central command or something that the liberals go to for marching orders?
mccain is in charge. he is supposed to put america first, not his own political ambitions.
his behavior may make some of them mad but he is disgracing himself with his desperation. and sarah is turning out to be exactly the kind of christian i have been paul revering about.
ol joe was right again.LOL
usedmeat
10/10/08
8:57 PM
QUOTE (justplainjoe @ Oct 10 2008, 02:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
oh please...liberals are blah blah blah...is that all liberals or just a handful? is there a central command or something that the liberals go to for marching orders?
mccain is in charge. he is supposed to put america first, not his own political ambitions.
his behavior may make some of them mad but he is disgracing himself with his desperation. and sarah is turning out to be exactly the kind of christian i have been paul revering about.
ol joe was right again.LOL

I don't know about most thinking Liberals, joe, because I are one. But the kool-ade drionking Kos-bots sure go to Obama central to download their thoughts du-jour.
Speaking of putting America first, what am I chopped liver? I wanted Bush held accountable for his domestic spying. Obama told me he wanted the same then let him off the hook by voting for TELCO immunity. I'm tired of dick Cheney's machinations to increase the profits of his energy buddies, aparently Obama isn't because he voted for dick's bill to give them even more of my money in the form of subsidies. Yeah sound's like Obama is really putting America first.
Kate
10/10/08
9:05 PM
QUOTE (justplainjoe @ Oct 10 2008, 02:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
mccain is in charge. he is supposed to put america first, not his own political ambitions.

Who suspended their campaign to return to Washington DC to do his job? A man who has put America first his entire adult life.

Who has served his country overseas and then 20+ years in Congress and Senate?

Did Obama ever put his life on the line for his country - NO!
View Topic | Comment on this blog