Surveillance state

July 30th, 2008 9:36 am · 3 comments

Bad when China does it. But:

Nonetheless, to watch U.S. Senators like Sam Brownback actually maintain a straight face while protesting China’s warrantless spying on the email and telephone communications of foreigners, and lamenting that private companies feel unfairly pressured to cooperate with China’s government spying out of fear of losing lucrative business opportunities, is so surreal that it’s actually hard to believe one is seeing it.

Because, notes Greenwald:

That’s the same Sen. Sam Brownback who voted last year to enact the Protect America Act, which “allow[ed] for massive, untargeted collection of international communications without court order or meaningful oversight by either Congress or the courts. It contain[ed] virtually no protections for the U.S. end of the phone call or email, leaving decisions about the collection, mining and use of Americans’ private communications up to this administration.” And it’s the same Sen. Brownback who also voted for this year’s FISA Amendments Act, which empowers the U.S. Government to tap directly into the U.S. telecommunications systems in order to monitor international emails and telephone calls with no individual warrant required.

Through the looking glass we go, on a daily basis.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  3 comments  Tags: Warrantless wiretapping

There are currently 3 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
dragonrider
7/30/08
10:59 AM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Jul 30 2008, 09:40 AM) [snapback]417305[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
The hypocrocy of what has become of american policy is sad.
citizen-too
7/30/08
11:32 AM
If you're not doing anything illegal, it shouldn't bother you. If they want to tap my emails to find that some of the stuff I buy online comes from other countries, go ahead. If it's a problem, I'll just wait until the item arrives at WalMart and there won't be any more problems. They should be tapping their own lines to find out what kinds of bull is going on from within.
dragonrider
7/30/08
12:36 PM
QUOTE(citizen-too @ Jul 30 2008, 11:32 AM) [snapback]417360[/snapback]
If you're not doing anything illegal, it shouldn't bother you. If they want to tap my emails to find that some of the stuff I buy online comes from other countries, go ahead. If it's a problem, I'll just wait until the item arrives at WalMart and there won't be any more problems. They should be tapping their own lines to find out what kinds of bull is going on from within.
It should bother you becuase it violates the constitution and if you violate one item on the constitution others will follow. I don't do anything illegal but my private conversations are just that private. As in none of your business and none of my governments business. People fight so hard to maintain the "right" to own hand guns but the even more important right of freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures are too too willing to give away.
View Topic | Comment on this blog