The pot calls the kettle…
July 16th, 2008 5:22 pm · 6 comments
…biased:
Continuing Fox News’ war of words with MSNBC, “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace accused its rival of being “in the tank” for Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama, while further pressing the news channel’s case that the mainstream press exhibits a liberal bias.
“I think MSNBC’s coverage went so far over the line that it lost all credibility,” Wallace told reporters Monday at the Television Critics Assn. press tour.
Really.
Notes Digby:
This is what we’ve come to. The unofficial propaganda arm of the Republican party is sanctimoniously calling out MSNBC for being biased, even as they employ the former political guru of the Bush administration who is avoiding congressional subpoenas pertaining to stories the network is covering.
That would be Karl Rove, who was employed for several months as a political commentator without noting his role as an informal advisor to the John McCain campaign.
This is all about cable news dominance, by the way. Fox is getting nervous as MSNBC positions itself as the anti-Fox. Both channels exhibit bias. But for Fox to whine about it is hilarious - and indicative of the fact that they’re running a little scared as the political winds shift. If the country trends less conservative it’s explicit bad news for the official mouthpiece of the conservative worldview; and then, Fox has some demographic problems (warning: This link takes you to the story that so enraged Fox they Photoshopped its writer).
There may come a time when MSNBC is as odious as Fox, works as hard to prop up a worldview and style of governance that has failed; that time comes after a long period of liberal dominance, and yes, it would then be as insufferable as Fox is now. But for each action is an equal and opposite reaction; there is a market for Keith Olbermann specifically because Bill O’Reilly and his employer exist. Even now, conservatives don’t grasp this. But they will.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: Media · Fox News
There are currently 6 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this blogrotenone 7/16/08 6:55 PM | QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Jul 16 2008, 05:25 PM) [snapback]411970[/snapback] Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
I could respect Fox a little more if they just admitted they're biased, instead of pointing the finger at everyone else. And credibility? Anyone who employs Karl Rove in any capacity has no credibility, in my opinion. |
ArtVandolay 7/17/08 7:50 AM | Former press people or political assistants to office holders is nothing new. It's been going on for years. Pierre Salinger, Tim Russert, George Stephanoplis, etc.
They all had dirty business to attend to while in public service.
But when Carl Rove working FOX for is mentioned, it's bad, bad, oh so bad. If you watched Fox news you might learn something. The go over to MSNBC to see who is more biased. That's if you can stand the sophomoric graphics and features of Mr. Pomposity and oh so intent on being fair and sincere, Keith Olbermann, then watch Dan Abrams with the Olberman part 2 of the night.
You think people are buying into that thpe of newscasting? Fox has nothing to worry about.
As I have said before, if Obama Wins, Fox wins. MSNBC will lose due to the factions of the left hating each other and will not know where to position itself, since it knows nothing about fair reporting.
|
Lysol54 7/17/08 7:57 AM | QUOTE(ArtVandolay @ Jul 17 2008, 07:50 AM) [snapback]412091[/snapback] Former press people or political assistants to office holders is nothing new. It's been going on for years. Pierre Salinger, Tim Russert, George Stephanoplis, etc.
They all had dirty business to attend to while in public service.
But when Carl Rove working FOX for is mentioned, it's bad, bad, oh so bad. If you watched Fox news you might learn something. The go over to MSNBC to see who is more biased. That's if you can stand the sophomoric graphics and features of Mr. Pomposity and oh so intent on being fair and sincere, Keith Olbermann, then watch Dan Abrams with the Olberman part 2 of the night.
You think people are buying into that thpe of newscasting? Fox has nothing to worry about.
As I have said before, if Obama Wins, Fox wins. MSNBC will lose due to the factions of the left hating each other and will not know where to position itself, since it knows nothing about fair reporting.
Ah yes Art spouting off again when he has no idea what hes talking about. Yeah see the differance with MSNBC(Olberman), Art is that they don't pretend to be "fair and balanced". They have a slant and they make that known. But the morons at Fox news try to pass their stuff off as news , not tabloid journalism, which is what it really is. And morons like you buy it hook line and sinker and then stick up for them, saying they are an actual legit news source. And as far as Rove goes, none of the other people you mentioned tried to shred the Constitution like that guy did. So keep tellling yourself whatever little lies you need to make it all make sense to you. Its morons like you that allow the Repubs to trample our rights. Why bother fighting for them when you can just give them up with a smile. Yup the Republican party is definitely the party of small government and less control.  |
InterestRP08 7/17/08 9:21 AM | It's not a hard concept to grab that NONE of these stations are telling you anything you need to hear. Actually, they ALL get their information from the SAME SOURCE. Whatever station you think is telling you the better and 'less biased' story is the one that FOOLED YOU. I don't understand how people in America don't really understand this...is the country THAT disillusioned?!?! Maybe stop drinking the water, that could help...
Media: WHOLLY COMPLETELY REGULATED BY THE GOVERNMENT. WHOLLY COMPLETELY OWNED BY HUGE CORPORATE ELITISTS.
Still think you're getting 'good news' through the network? |
citizen-too 7/17/08 9:35 AM | If you think Fox News is the only biased news service, you're wrong. Every news service is biased, including the one you're looking at right now.
The Intel snd the New Era will often print opposing views on the same stories. Different reporters, different editors, different views.
|
graphicsully 7/17/08 9:37 AM | QUOTE(InterestRP08 @ Jul 17 2008, 09:21 AM) [snapback]412131[/snapback] It's not a hard concept to grab that NONE of these stations are telling you anything you need to hear. Actually, they ALL get their information from the SAME SOURCE. Whatever station you think is telling you the better and 'less biased' story is the one that FOOLED YOU. I don't understand how people in America don't really understand this...is the country THAT disillusioned?!?! Maybe stop drinking the water, that could help...
Media: WHOLLY COMPLETELY REGULATED BY THE GOVERNMENT. WHOLLY COMPLETELY OWNED BY HUGE CORPORATE ELITISTS.
Still think you're getting 'good news' through the network?
I really only have 2 problems with the "news". Cause any moron knows that they're all bias. Why is it 95% politics and the other 5% is negative news? You'd think there is nothing but elections and hurricanes all the time. That is if you'd actually believe that its a good summation of what's going on. |
View Topic | Comment on this blog