Michelle “Fox News’ Ethnic Shield” Malkin defends Fox News’ use of the “Baby Mama”
Michelle Malkin will continue to make excuses for Fox News’ dog-whistling racism that expose the fact that she’s about as familiar with logical thinking as a rainbow trout is with knitting,

Exactly who were the outraged liberals, to begin with?,
As if it really matters, they know they're out there, somewhere, and that's justification in and of itself.

I'm trying to find out.. maybe ...No mention of it ...I'll try later.

Yea, that's what I thought.
It was a "bad decision" by a chyron operator, none of it was intentional...

Exactly who were the outraged liberals, to begin with?,
As if it really matters, they know they're out there, somewhere, and that's justification in and of itself.

This isn't really related:
Neil Cavuto doesn't hesitate to remove the crawl and the chyron when he has a guest with big boobs on. On those days, that screen is clear as a bell so viewers have an unobstructed, uncluttered view of the topic at hand.

It's definately related.
Fox Noise isn't a legitimate news source. It's tabloid propaganda TV at it's worst. Just like Rupert Murdoch's other fine news outlet, The Sun

and it's regular sleaze page, 3

Viewed by millions of sleazy Americans clinging to their guns and God?

Viewed by millions of sleazy Americans

Viewed by millions of sleazy Americans clinging to their guns and God?

Aww, did you get your feelings hurt?

Like 24/7 Jerry Springer, only toned down a bit.

It's definately related.
Fox Noise isn't a legitimate news source. It's tabloid propaganda TV at it's worst. Just like Rupert Murdoch's other fine news outlet, The Sun

and it's regular sleaze page, 3

Here I was trying to change the subject to something I thought might be more fun... big boobs, and you go right back to politics. Killjoy.

Who changed subjects? There are PLENTY of big boobs in politics.

I still want to know why Barack is called Black when he is equally White?

That was the rule in the era that so many republicans miss so I reckon it applies now.

You're kidding right? You mean like democratic senator Byrd of West Virginia?

Hey I never voted for him, I would never vote for a former member of the Klan But then he is about the only senator that is a bigger Fossil than McBush.

So then your only commenting on politicians you vote for, even with your blanket statements.

You must only vote for republicans.

Wow did you have a net for such a big leap from what I said to what you interpreted.

I still want to know why Barack is called Black when he is equally White?

Probably because individuals of mixed race were historically grouped with blacks by other cultures. When discrimination was still acceptable in the United States, anyone with dark brown skin was considered to be a "Negro", and treated accordingly. Consequently, people of mixed heritage came to identify themselves as being black.

When I was in junior high school, a friend who naturally tanned quite dark was denied entrance to the Brookside swimming pool on several occasions, because he was considered to be black. The joke was, he wasn't born in the U.S., he was a pure-blooded British citizen!

I've had the opportunity to meet several residents of various African countries. Most of these people were much darker-skinned than what we are used to seeing here. I also encountered several Ethiopian immigrants while I was in Israel, wearing IDF uniforms, and those young men were BLACK. The point is, most black individuals who live here in the U.S. are of mixed heritage, just like most Caucasians here are of mixed heritage (for example, I'm roughly 50% Pennsylvania Dutch, 25% Irish, and 25% English).

See, here's the thing people don't seem to really get. The whole idea of "black", "white", etc. is antiquated and entirely innacurate. There is only one "race," that being the human race. The differences that make us unique, be they skin color, culture, or just plain out individuality, should be things that unite us, rather than things that divide us.

I'm rather extensively well read, and the world we see in the writings of Samuel Langhorn Clemens, is not the world of today. The America of the 1960's in which there was great upheaval and an all out culture war unlike any ever seen in this country (or elsewhere for that matter), is not the America of today. Many of those of us who are younger, who were born after the upheaval of that time, do not see people by the color of their skin, but rather by their individual actions. I've been asked before whether I get nervous if I see a "black" man on a city street. Quite honestly, I've never been harmed by anyone who would fit that description, and so I do not see anyone of dark complexion as a threat. On the contrary, I've only ever been robbed, beaten, or had attempts upon my character by persons who would be considered caucasian. I can think of one occasion in college actually, where I had come under a vicious attack by another "white" student. One of the greatest supports I had at that time was a good friend of African-American descent who took time to pray with me and help me through the difficulty of the emotional struggle I was dealing with.

I also see things through the eyes of a Bible scholar (the area in which I have my degree, and no, I'm not a pastor, nor do I wish to be). Through my own study of the scriptures, I have come to the conclusion that since we all share a singular ancestral couple (that being Adam and Eve), we are all related. We are all brothers and sisters, whether our complexion be dark or so fair skinned that we burn to a crisp after a minute in the sun.

The antiquated ideals of men like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Jeremiah Wright, and anyone else you can name who throw around the words "black" and "white" in order to cause division and further their own bitterness and careers, are anathema to me. It makes absolutely no sense to me how someone who claims to be a minister of Jesus Christ, can be so full of vitriol for another. The teachings of Christ embody two unifying principles; love and forgiveness. Sadly, these two principles are sorely lacking in anyone who chooses to use their position of influence as a place from which they may sow division.