The hate loses

May 14th, 2008 11:36 am · 193 comments

I’m not quite sure why I can’t find this online anywhere, but if you have a chance check out Peter DeCoursey’s column on the editorial page of today’s Intell, where he writes about how state Sen. Vince Fumo used a little legislative ju-jitsu to defeat Sen. Mike Brubaker’s “Hate The Gay” bill:

There were at least nine Senate Republicans and more than that number of Senate Democrats who wanted a good reason to vote against the bill or weaken it dramatically.

Fumo gave them that reason by highlighting the provision in the ban on giving gay couples rights “equivalent” to marriage. That was so broad, Fumo knew he could command sufficient support to amend it…

<snip>

As one Republican senator told me: “I am fine with defining marrage as being between one man and one woman. I am not fine with taking away rights gays have now, from the government or from their employer, because they are people.”

Well, not to Brubaker - or rather, not to Brubaker’s contituents. Because, see, while a legislative staffer assured DeCoursey that it’s not Brubaker who has a problem with gays, it’s that “he represents a lot of anti-gay Republicans in Lancaster. This was a bill to please poeple who think gays are sinful and want to reduce the rights and benefits they get now.”

Got that? It was a bill not just to ”protect marriage” - it was specifically designed to strip rights from gays. Because we here in Lancaster County - or lots of Republicans here in Lancaster County - don’t merely want gays to be prevented from getting more rights. We want them to have fewer rights; we want to take away the ones they already have.

But they lost. Again. And DeCoursey’s piece makes clear that however angry the local wingers might be - however the likes of Brubaker may try to go to bat on behalf of that hatred - the legislature on the whole, perhaps reflecting Pennsylvania on the whole - isn’t into taking away people’s rights, regardless of whom they sleep with.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  193 comments  Tags: Gay marriage · Homosexuality · Pennsylvania

There are currently 193 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
dragonrider
5/14/08
1:57 PM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ May 14 2008, 11:40 AM) [snapback]388993[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
Off course this has always been the intent to remove rights from gays, Some will openly admit that that is their intent others need to stoop to this type of subterfuge. obviously if the intent was to protect marriage the first thing you would look at would be the astronomical rates of divorce and the rampant cohabitation. These two items are destroying marriage by heterosexuals for heterosexuals.



I wrote in a previous blog about a letter to the editor in the NY Times which really struck me. Incarcerated criminals have more rights to marry than I do. They do not have the right to vote even after release on federal crimes. But they can get married even while still incarcerated, Rapist, spouse abusers, pedophiles, child abusers, mass murderers all can get married even while incarcerated but I who has never been convicted or charged with any crime whose only fault is loving someone of the same gender can never marry.



This type of subterfuge of naming a bill of to make it palatable has been a tool in use for a least two decades. One needs only listen to the sponsors to hear the true meaning of the bills.

littledutchboy
5/14/08
2:41 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 14 2008, 01:57 PM) [snapback]389082[/snapback]
Off course this has always been the intent to remove rights from gays, Some will openly admit that that is their intent others need to stoop to this type of subterfuge. obviously if the intent was to protect marriage the first thing you would look at would be the astronomical rates of divorce and the rampant cohabitation. These two items are destroying marriage by heterosexuals for heterosexuals.



I wrote in a previous blog about a letter to the editor in the NY Times which really struck me. Incarcerated criminals have more rights to marry than I do. They do not have the right to vote even after release on federal crimes. But they can get married even while still incarcerated, Rapist, spouse abusers, pedophiles, child abusers, mass murderers all can get married even while incarcerated but I who has never been convicted or charged with any crime whose only fault is loving someone of the same gender can never marry.



This type of subterfuge of naming a bill of to make it palatable has been a tool in use for a least two decades. One needs only listen to the sponsors to hear the true meaning of the bills.





Subterfuge? There is no subterfuge about it; the amendment states that marriage is defined as being between 1 man and 1 woman and that this status will not be extended to any other combination. Sounds straight foreword to me.



Gay unions are not recognized now in any way so how are rights being taken away from this group? They’re not, but it sounds better to say they are, gays hope to get victim status to further their cause.



This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring, state laws says NO, so NO it is! Calling people that don’t go along with the gay lifestyle names is childish and very transparent.









dee
5/14/08
2:54 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 14 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]389116[/snapback]




This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring,





So are your posts that say the SAME thing every time you mention the topic. How about discussing it openly, not reiterating the same point time after time after time. . . . we get it already. Now if you really want to convince anybody that you are right, broaden your points, tell us more. Just don't beat us over the head with the same info each and every post.

dragonrider
5/14/08
2:55 PM
Actually the bill also says no to conferring any rights to civil unions which could have a significant erosion of rights not just for homosexuals but also heterosexuals in terms of adoption, hospital visitation, inheritance company benefits such as health insurance. But your ignorance of facts is as profound as your statements are lacking LDB perhaps you should find time to educate yourself before speaking

But hey I do agree that all this fighting for special rights is tiresome so why not extend the special rights of white male heterosexuals to all people then you can be unbothered.

Pericles
5/14/08
3:06 PM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ May 14 2008, 11:40 AM) [snapback]388993[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.


You're analysis is absolutely absurd Gil.

A senate staffer actually told a reporter that Brubaker respects gays, but Brubaker was representing the will of Lancaster County Republicans who hate gays? That's what you're basing this on? It's absolute nonsense.

But since someone wrote it, it must be true. Now where is the outrage from all these gay haters since the bill was defeated?

And since the bill was defeated:

How many letters to the editors were written by these gay haters?

How many protests were organized by these haters?
grieker
5/14/08
3:06 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 14 2008, 02:55 PM) [snapback]389127[/snapback]
special rights of white male heterosexuals


Do tell, what are they?

Bigmaclender2
5/14/08
3:09 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 14 2008, 02:55 PM) [snapback]389127[/snapback]
Actually the bill also says no to conferring any rights to civil unions which could have a significant erosion of rights not just for homosexuals but also heterosexuals in terms of adoption, hospital visitation, inheritance company benefits such as health insurance. But your ignorance of facts is as profound as your statements are lacking LDB perhaps you should find time to educate yourself before speaking

But hey I do agree that all this fighting for special rights is tiresome so why not extend the special rights of white male heterosexuals to all people then you can be unbothered.





OUCH!!! (true, but still, ouch!) hee hee good one...........



QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 14 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]389116[/snapback]

Subterfuge? There is no subterfuge about it; the amendment states that marriage is defined as being between 1 man and 1 woman and that this status will not be extended to any other combination. Sounds straight foreword to me.

Gay unions are not recognized now in any way so how are rights being taken away from this group? They're not, but it sounds better to say they are, gays hope to get victim status to further their cause.

This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring, state laws says NO, so NO it is! Calling people that don't go along with the gay lifestyle names is childish and very transparent.




At one time blacks had no rights either-NO-so NO it was...............

It's coming, LDB...........I can't wait to hear what you have to say when it does........

bigstew
5/14/08
7:15 PM
QUOTE(dee @ May 14 2008, 02:54 PM) [snapback]389124[/snapback]




So are your posts that say the SAME thing every time you mention the topic. How about discussing it openly, not reiterating the same point time after time after time. . . . we get it already. Now if you really want to convince anybody that you are right, broaden your points, tell us more. Just don't beat us over the head with the same info each and every post.

That goes both ways.
Bigmaclender2
5/14/08
7:56 PM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 14 2008, 07:15 PM) [snapback]389225[/snapback]
That goes both ways.




Would that make it a "bi-sexual" conversation???????

LOL

Bigby_M
5/14/08
8:48 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 14 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]389116[/snapback]




Subterfuge? There is no subterfuge about it; the amendment states that marriage is defined as being between 1 man and 1 woman and that this status will not be extended to any other combination. Sounds straight foreword to me.

[/size]

Gay unions are not recognized now in any way so how are rights being taken away from this group? They're not, but it sounds better to say they are, gays hope to get victim status to further their cause.



[size="3"]This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring, state laws says NO, so NO it is! Calling people that don't go along with the gay lifestyle names is childish and very transparent.












LDB hasn't it occured to you yet that this article was about you and your fellow travelers?



QUOTE(Pericles @ May 14 2008, 03:06 PM) [snapback]389133[/snapback]


How many letters to the editors were written by these gay haters?

How many protests were organized by these haters?


So they don't have the guts to come out and say so, what a surprise.

Who would have thought they were snivelers?

Well me for one . laugh.gif

Rural Conservative
5/15/08
12:40 AM
Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.

Sheesh...My wife told me tonight that she doesn't want a dog, but I want a dog...we disagree...that must mean we hate each other.

I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Note the word "friends" in that sentence...obviously, I must hate them if they are my friends. They knew I disagreed with their lifestyle, but we never made it an issue. We've lost touch over time, but I know if we were to meet again, it would still be as friends.

Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer.

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

Do I think God recognizes the union of a homosexual couple whether they claim to be married or not? Well, that's His business, not mine.

I believe homosexuality is a sin; however, I also believe murder, rape, incest, lust, gluttony, gossip, slander, etc. are sins. No one sin is any worse in God's eyes than another. Jesus Himself said "it is not the healthy who need a physician, but the sick." Funny...seems to me that he was falsely accused too...Seems to me He also said that the greatest commandment is to "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and the second is like unto it, Love your neighbor as yourself."

So Gil (and any of you others out there who want to try to twist everything into an emotional argument by calling someone a hatemonger when they disagree with you), they are certainly some people out there who are deluded in their thinking, who do hate others based upon their choices in life. They are not indicative of the bulk of Conservative Christians. Most of us do our best to reach out to anyone struggling with sin of any kind, through the love of Christ, not through any idea that we are better than they.

Your tactics are very tiresome and more than a little childish.
dragonrider
5/15/08
1:02 AM
Well there you go I should stop wanting to be able to visit my partner in the hospital, share medical decisions with her, wanting to inherit from her, coadopt a child with her, share my health insurance with her, claim her on my income tax to name a few of the special rights of marriage given by governmental marriage. Becuase to want to have my relationship treated equally with yours is just childish and tiresome. And to expect US to live up to the words of the constitution that all people are created equal and endowed with equal rights from our creator is just boring.

Frankly I could care less what some conservative church feels about my relationship to quote Jesus I would shake the dust off my feet from any such church. Keep your religous marriage just extend to me the same rights and responsibilities

Thankfully the history of the US is the expansion of rights to a wider range of minorities and the stands against treating all people as equal always fails.

Rural Conservative
5/15/08
1:23 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 01:02 AM) [snapback]389293[/snapback]
...Becuase to want to have my relationship treated equally with yours is just childish and tiresome...


There ya went and proved my point. Instead of actually reading what I wrote with a will to understand, you went and twisted my words into something that was not written, nor implied, in order to serve your own agenda.

My post was about people who claim that anyone who disagrees with them must hate them. Your response has nothing to do with what I wrote, and instead proves my point by making the same implications that Mr. Smart has made.
dragonrider
5/15/08
2:08 AM
Sorry Rural you construed my post as response to you it was to LDB who did characterize my desire for equal rights as boring and childish.

As far as most conservative christians and conservative churches reaching out to homosexuals I would most strongly disagree. I have heard enough from conservative christians that can only be characterized as hate. Such as the recent politician who said gays desire for equal rights are worse than Islamic terrorists How can I characterize such a statement as anything but hate. Or the minister that likes to go around saying God Hates Fags. Or Pastor Hagee who blamed the Huricane Katrina on a gay pride event in New Orleans. Or Pastor Falwell and Robertson who said gays were the cause of 9/11 If this is reaching out in love its a very perverted love.



Rural Conservative
5/15/08
2:39 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 02:08 AM) [snapback]389313[/snapback]
Sorry Rural you construed my post as response to you it was to LDB who did characterize my desire for equal rights as boring and childish.

As far as most conservative christians and conservative churches reaching out to homosexuals I would most strongly disagree. I have heard enough from conservative christians that can only be characterized as hate. Such as the recent politician who said gays desire for equal rights are worse than Islamic terrorists How can I characterize such a statement as anything but hate. Or the minister that likes to go around saying God Hates Fags. Or Pastor Hagee who blamed the Huricane Katrina on a gay pride event in New Orleans. Or Pastor Falwell and Robertson who said gays were the cause of 9/11 If this is reaching out in love its a very perverted love.



The persons and groups you cite are a minority within conservative Christianity. It is because they are so vocal in their declamation of others that they recieve so much attention. The Westboro Baptist Church and others like them only get attention because of the media's agenda for painting all conservative Christians as evil hatemongers. Every other Christian I have spoken to about the incidences you cite, has been appalled by them.

What you don't see brought up in the media are the churches who do reach out to the homosexual community, unless it is to belittle them. I know such ministries exist, as I've spoken to persons involved in them, though I'm a bit tired at the moment and would rather sleep than search. If you do a search on AIDS relief though, you will find many Christian organizations (the one search I did found no secular groups). I know that's probably a hot button and I'm not saying that AIDS only affects homosexuals, but it does have a greater affect on the homosexual community in America than it does on others (see http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance...ic.htm#exposure for statistics if you want),

Are there conservative Christians who hate others for whatever reason? Sure there are. Are there Liberal Atheists who hate others for whatever reason? Sure there are. Do the majority of either group hate others for whatever reason? Probably not.

Again, the media (like Mr. Smart), only give us a small piece of the picture to look at. They do this because it is sensational and it gets attention. Journalism is no longer an unbiased field. It's all about selling papers or getting better TV ratings.

Oh, and by the by, if you don't want someone to think you're quoting them, don't use their wording. laugh.gif
dragonrider
5/15/08
3:00 AM
I speak about Conservative Christians and Conservative Christian Churches not just from the media but also from personal experience. The minister of the Presbyterian church in Oshkosh Wi when I came out said she could not guarantee my personal safety if I came to church, The Presbyterian Church in Appleton minister said they would disband the choir if I sang in it, that I could not join the church as the person who conducted new member class refused to have me in the class, the minister said that my presence was akin to me sexual assaulting the other member by involving them in my fetish, I will never forget being told not to come to Good Friday service as that would ruin it for everyone else.

Thats my personal story not some media with a spin. If thats is love you can have it.

Rural Conservative
5/15/08
8:22 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 03:00 AM) [snapback]389324[/snapback]

Thats my personal story not some media with a spin. If thats is love you can have it.



I am sorry you have had bad experiences with churches in your past. The experiences you listed are sad examples of how not to show love for another person.

However, assuming that all Christians are like that just because some Christians were unkind to you is stereotyping. Say a person visits the ocean for the first time, having never actually seen the ocean, but having been told that there are white sandy beaches on the ocean, and the place they visit happens to be lined with rocks instead of sand. They could assume that what they have been told is a lie, or they could keep looking for another beach.
johnq
5/15/08
8:31 AM
I had a homosexual cousin who died of AIDS in 1990. He was also a strict practicing Catholic. When he became too ill to attend Mass, one of the priests and several members of his Congregation came to his house and performed Mass there. That is an example of the kind of love that exists in some churches.
dee
5/15/08
8:59 AM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 14 2008, 07:15 PM) [snapback]389225[/snapback]
That goes both ways.


Would you like to share your viewpoint on the issue and discuss it or would you just like to jump in on our discussion and make disparaging marks against me?

LicenseForMayhem
5/15/08
9:52 AM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 12:40 AM) [snapback]389288[/snapback]
Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.



That's a very interesting point. This happens with all sorts of issues, not just ones relating to homosexuality. To me, it's a red flag when someone wants to short-circuit any meaningful dialogue by labeling those who disagree as "haters". Maybe they are afraid there is some sense in what the other person has to say, so they want to cut it off before that person has a say. Maybe they don't want to accept that an issue is not neatly black and white--gray areas are hard to navigate. Or maybe they have a vested interest in keeping the matter from being discussed rationally and settled amicably. At any rate, it's a roadblock to honest dialogue.
dragonrider
5/15/08
10:54 AM
Rural If you have not seen the movie For the Bible Tells Me So, then I might suggest you do. My experiences with conservative christians and conservative christian churches is not unigue. There remain a lot of homeless GBLT kids who were thrown out by their conservative parents.
flanagan
5/15/08
11:02 AM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 14 2008, 11:40 PM) [snapback]389288[/snapback]
Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.

Sheesh...My wife told me tonight that she doesn't want a dog, but I want a dog...we disagree...that must mean we hate each other.

I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Note the word "friends" in that sentence...obviously, I must hate them if they are my friends. They knew I disagreed with their lifestyle, but we never made it an issue. We've lost touch over time, but I know if we were to meet again, it would still be as friends.

Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer.

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

Do I think God recognizes the union of a homosexual couple whether they claim to be married or not? Well, that's His business, not mine.

I believe homosexuality is a sin; however, I also believe murder, rape, incest, lust, gluttony, gossip, slander, etc. are sins. No one sin is any worse in God's eyes than another. Jesus Himself said "it is not the healthy who need a physician, but the sick." Funny...seems to me that he was falsely accused too...Seems to me He also said that the greatest commandment is to "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and the second is like unto it, Love your neighbor as yourself."

So Gil (and any of you others out there who want to try to twist everything into an emotional argument by calling someone a hatemonger when they disagree with you), they are certainly some people out there who are deluded in their thinking, who do hate others based upon their choices in life. They are not indicative of the bulk of Conservative Christians. Most of us do our best to reach out to anyone struggling with sin of any kind, through the love of Christ, not through any idea that we are better than they.

Your tactics are very tiresome and more than a little childish.




Very well said!

littledutchboy
5/15/08
11:08 AM
QUOTE(LicenseForMayhem @ May 15 2008, 09:52 AM) [snapback]389393[/snapback]


That's a very interesting point. This happens with all sorts of issues, not just ones relating to homosexuality. To me, it's a red flag when someone wants to short-circuit any meaningful dialogue by labeling those who disagree as "haters". Maybe they are afraid there is some sense in what the other person has to say, so they want to cut it off before that person has a say. Maybe they don't want to accept that an issue is not neatly black and white--gray areas are hard to navigate. Or maybe they have a vested interest in keeping the matter from being discussed rationally and settled amicably. At any rate, it's a roadblock to honest dialogue.




“Hate speak” as used by liberal activists, is a tool used to try to gain a position in favor of a particular group. The PC news/activist template requires a clear victim and a corresponding clear oppressor. “hate speak” in the land of PC is a default reaction when there is no hope of the desired result from temperate, reasoned debate. “Civil Rights” is the 2nd default setting, everyone supports individual civil rights, but we are more then individuals, our individual actions affect others, our laws and regulations are a balancing act between individual rights and communal rights.



Is the community helped or hindered by gay marriage? At best it’s a push, but it may not be a push, it could be a negative, is it worth it to experiment?



If gays have a civil right to marry then so do polygamists and any and every combination of people who feel they have a right, how could the civil rights argument be true for one group and not the other? Pandora’s box?







2fat2ride
5/15/08
11:24 AM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 15 2008, 11:08 AM) [snapback]389436[/snapback]


Is the community helped or hindered by gay marriage? At best it's a push, but it may not be a push, it could be a negative, is it worth it to experiment?



Do you mean is it worth experimenting with a tradition in which 50% of all heterosexual marriages end in failure?

I would say it is a prime example of a tradition that needs to be experimented with, in more ways than one.

dc
5/15/08
11:46 AM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 15 2008, 11:24 AM) [snapback]389444[/snapback]
Do you mean is it worth experimenting with a tradition in which 50% of all heterosexual marriages end in failure?
I would say it is a prime example of a tradition that needs to be experimented with, in more ways than one.
My marriage is doing great. Sorry if yours is not.......
2fat2ride
5/15/08
1:57 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 11:46 AM) [snapback]389470[/snapback]
My marriage is doing great. Sorry if yours is not.......




Hey, I take my wife with me wherever I go...but somehow she keeps finding her way back.





Scout
5/15/08
2:02 PM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 15 2008, 01:57 PM) [snapback]389591[/snapback]

Hey, I take my wife with me wherever I go...but somehow she keeps finding her way back.


Lemme guess, you have one of the t-shirts that says on the back "If you can read this, the b*tch fell off"? laugh.gif

dc
5/15/08
2:07 PM
QUOTE(Scout @ May 15 2008, 02:02 PM) [snapback]389594[/snapback]
Lemme guess, you have one of the t-shirts that says on the back "If you can read this, the b*tch fell off"?
That would explain why his is not........
Shawn
5/15/08
2:14 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 11:46 AM) [snapback]389470[/snapback]
My marriage is doing great. Sorry if yours is not.......




Would your marriage be worse off if homosexuals were allowed to marry? I would expect not. I think that is the point the original poster was trying to make.


Later...Shawn

dragonrider
5/15/08
2:17 PM
LDB, I have seen many reasoned discussions here from the left to which you reply with some non sequetir or hate. So I think the same can be said of the right.



Rural I have found a church but you can be sure it is not a conservative church nor do I include and conservative christians among my friends, You see the problem arises thus, A conservative christian says my "lifestyle" is a "choice". That this choice can and should be legislated against just like polygamy, beastiality or pedophilia.

Now first and foremost I see Homosexuality and transgenderism as something I was born with . I never chose nor did any of my gay friends chose to be gay or transgendered. They just are gay , just as you are straight. you never chose to be straight. Now when I am told that conservative christians want to legislate against homosexuality and I know I have no choice but to be what I am I hear them saying they want to legislate me out of existance to in effect end my life. Secondly when I am repeatedly compared to polygamists and pedophiles , I feel greatly insulted. So I respond with rightous indignation becuase I feel threatened and insulted. This is not hate this is rightous indignation for my life being denigrated and my rights being legislated away.

When I came out I was shot at, someone tried to run me over with a car, My tires were slashed, nails place under my tires, hate messages put on my car and workplace. I have a real reason to feel physically threatened by the response from the christian conservative Transgendered people have the highest percentage of hate crimes against them of any minority and most acts of violence are massive overkill where the victim is repeatedly stabbed and beaten.

dc
5/15/08
2:18 PM
QUOTE(Shawn @ May 15 2008, 02:14 PM) [snapback]389601[/snapback]
Would your marriage be worse off if homosexuals were allowed to marry? I would expect not. I think that is the point the original poster was trying to make.
My point is very simple. There are many marriages out there that are doing great. Too often I see the picture painted that marriages are in trouble, or need fixed. It is a blanket statement that is not accurate, in my opinion.........
Shawn
5/15/08
2:20 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 02:18 PM) [snapback]389605[/snapback]
My point is very simple. There are many marriages out there that are doing great. Too often I see the picture painted that marriages are in trouble, or need fixed. It is a blanket statement that is not accurate, in my opinion.........




I think the reason you see that is because of things like a "Marriage Protection Amendment". I agree with your assement that marriage doesn't need to be protected. But with legislation like this being proposed, one has to ask, from what does marriage need to be protected from?



Later...Shawn

Goldilocks
5/15/08
3:17 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 01:17 PM) [snapback]389604[/snapback]

Transgendered people have the highest percentage of hate crimes against them of any minority and most acts of violence are massive overkill where the victim is repeatedly stabbed and beaten.


I am surprised it isn't splashed all over the news media. Could you cite your sources.



dragonrider
5/16/08
1:18 AM
I no longer have the source but I had read at one time a study that reported 100% of transgendered have suffered physical or verbal violence. I might suggest checking out Remembering our Dead site.
Wonder
5/16/08
2:10 AM
How can you be BORN transgendered? smile.gif

dragonrider
5/16/08
2:15 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 16 2008, 02:10 AM) [snapback]389854[/snapback]
How can you be BORN transgendered? smile.gif

You know what Wonder you have crossed the line. you are now on my permanent ignore. I post a response and list a site which references one murdered transexual every month as hate crime and this is your response. I finally agree this topic is useless and I will leave the gay baiting posts to others. see ya
Bigby_M
5/16/08
5:57 AM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 02:18 PM) [snapback]389605[/snapback]
There are many marriages out there that are doing great. .


Don't half of all marriages end in divorce? With that in mind how many are not divorcing for the sake of the children or for another reason?

While many marriages are doing great I think most are not.

I would venture to guess that 20 years hence the fidelity among gay couples will far exceed the fidelity among those typical church marriages.

What needs protection is the people from the truth about themselves. laugh.gif

This is America, dad gummit, we can't handle the truth, especially about ourselves. laugh.gif

tugrad
5/16/08
7:31 AM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 12:40 AM) [snapback]389288[/snapback]

I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer.



For the same reasons straights "need to" marry. We want to protect our children and our relationships. Marriage confers rights as well a responsiblities. We want both. Just like you do. Marriage is a public, legal way of telling the entire world that this is the person I intend to spend my life with, no one goes into thinking they will divorce. The mere act of marriage supports the couple through rough patches (and all relationships have them). It is amazing that so many gay couples stay together for so long without this public and legal support.

Bigmaclender2
5/16/08
12:05 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 16 2008, 02:15 AM) [snapback]389855[/snapback]
You know what Wonder you have crossed the line. you are now on my permanent ignore. I post a response and list a site which references one murdered transexual every month as hate crime and this is your response. I finally agree this topic is useless and I will leave the gay baiting posts to others. see ya




You know that I have agreed with all of your posts thusfar but I believe, IMOO, that you may be a bit hypersensative to that question. I can't state whether she meant any malice or not but IMO I don't think that she did. I think it was an honest question trying to understand a subject that not many have any knowledge of. I am gay and hang around T people and I don't even get the entire thing. I am being completely honest here. I am constantly asking them questions. They are also very patient with me because they know that I don't mean them harm-I am trying to educate myself. Allow her to be educated. I think I would reconsider the question and answer with the utmost honesty as you always do. For example-some men have a sex change and become a woman to be with a woman. I don't understand this and am still striving to do so. You know what I mean?

dc
5/16/08
12:10 PM
QUOTE(Bigby_M @ May 16 2008, 05:57 AM) [snapback]389870[/snapback]

Don't half of all marriages end in divorce? With that in mind how many are not divorcing for the sake of the children or for another reason?
While many marriages are doing great I think most are not.
The point is, there are many out there that are doing very well. Whether it is a majority or not, the picture seems to be portrayed that all marriages are bad. This is not the case....
Bigmaclender2
5/16/08
12:11 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 16 2008, 12:10 PM) [snapback]390060[/snapback]
The point is, there are many out there that are doing very well. Whether it is a majority or not, the picture seems to be portrayed that all marriages are bad. This is not the case....




They had to name it the "Marriage Protection Act" because they couldn't transparently name it the "No Gay Marriage Act". IMOO

dragonrider
5/16/08
2:39 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 16 2008, 12:05 PM) [snapback]390057[/snapback]




You know that I have agreed with all of your posts thusfar but I believe, IMOO, that you may be a bit hypersensative to that question. I can't state whether she meant any malice or not but IMO I don't think that she did. I think it was an honest question trying to understand a subject that not many have any knowledge of. I am gay and hang around T people and I don't even get the entire thing. I am being completely honest here. I am constantly asking them questions. They are also very patient with me because they know that I don't mean them harm-I am trying to educate myself. Allow her to be educated. I think I would reconsider the question and answer with the utmost honesty as you always do. For example-some men have a sex change and become a woman to be with a woman. I don't understand this and am still striving to do so. You know what I mean?

Perhaps you are right, if so I apologize. I tend to get cranky sometimes. But you have to admit that a recurring theme from the right is you can not be born gay or transgendered you chose to be gay or transgendered. When I was talking about the death of many transgedered and violence against transgendered and am asked that question again it did seem to get my ire.



No man can have a sex change to be with a woman!!!!! He could never get surgical approval if that was his reason. There used to be a rumor about me that I became a woman becuase my wife was a lesbian and I thought I could keep her that way. I laughed my !profanity! off when I heard that one. Some Male to Female MTF transexuals remain attracted to women post transition I count myself among that group. Some Female to Male Transexuals remain attracted to men after surgery. As a lesbian you must know that gender and sexual orientation are not synonymous.



How can one be born transgendered. I don't know nor does anyone else. I presume the same way one can be born intersexual, born with ambigous or both genitals. The brain is a very complex organ but just another organ with equal variatioan in structure as any other organ. Some people are made transsexual I am sure but this is at a very early age, gender identity is set at a very young age under age 4 from what I have read. Wether I was born transgendered or abused into by a father that sexually, physically and verbally abused me from my earliest memories is mute. Becuase now it is immutable , it is who I am and I better love who I am as this is the only life I can have.



Is that better BigMac biggrin.gif



Last night I read in the NYTimes about a Indian couple. she was pregnant and they were in their early 20's A crowd broke into their house and kicked and beat her until he awoke then the drug them both out and strangled them both on the edge of town. Their crime they violated a religous law that says a man and a woman from the same town can not marry. This is what happens when you have religous laws governing marriage Of course in middle east you have men being killed for just being in the company of a known gay man.
Bigmaclender2
5/17/08
1:00 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 16 2008, 02:39 PM) [snapback]390137[/snapback]
Perhaps you are right, if so I apologize. I tend to get cranky sometimes. But you have to admit that a recurring theme from the right is you can not be born gay or transgendered you chose to be gay or transgendered. When I was talking about the death of many transgedered and violence against transgendered and am asked that question again it did seem to get my ire.



No man can have a sex change to be with a woman!!!!! He could never get surgical approval if that was his reason. There used to be a rumor about me that I became a woman becuase my wife was a lesbian and I thought I could keep her that way. I laughed my !profanity! off when I heard that one. Some Male to Female MTF transexuals remain attracted to women post transition I count myself among that group. Some Female to Male Transexuals remain attracted to men after surgery. As a lesbian you must know that gender and sexual orientation are not synonymous.



How can one be born transgendered. I don't know nor does anyone else. I presume the same way one can be born intersexual, born with ambigous or both genitals. The brain is a very complex organ but just another organ with equal variatioan in structure as any other organ. Some people are made transsexual I am sure but this is at a very early age, gender identity is set at a very young age under age 4 from what I have read. Wether I was born transgendered or abused into by a father that sexually, physically and verbally abused me from my earliest memories is mute. Becuase now it is immutable , it is who I am and I better love who I am as this is the only life I can have.



Is that better BigMac biggrin.gif



Last night I read in the NYTimes about a Indian couple. she was pregnant and they were in their early 20's A crowd broke into their house and kicked and beat her until he awoke then the drug them both out and strangled them both on the edge of town. Their crime they violated a religous law that says a man and a woman from the same town can not marry. This is what happens when you have religous laws governing marriage Of course in middle east you have men being killed for just being in the company of a known gay man.




I didn't know that you can't get a sex change if you are a man and want to become a woman to be with a woman. I do thank you for the sweet response..........

dragonrider
5/17/08
1:52 AM
The process of changing physical genders is complex BigMac. Before even starting one needs approval of a psychologist to get an appointment with an endocrenologist. Approval from the psychologist normally takes numerous meetings over months. Some psychologist also require that you take the Minnesota multiphasic personality test. During this first step one must develope a plan of action for your public appearance as the opposite physical gender. How to tell your family, your employer, what support you have that you know will stick with you through your transition etc. These steps must all be completed before a letter is issued to allow you to begin hormonal therapy.



Before seeking surgery one must have lived one to two years in the gender of transition and have been on hormonal therapy for a year. You must establish that you have establish a stable life as the new gender. Approval must be obtained from one psychologist and one psychiatrist to get a letter of approval for surgery



To obtain approval you must prove that your transgenderism is something that has been a part of your life for a very long time. You must also establish that surgery is the only solution to this problem as opposed to living androgenously. I think in the future the androgenous obtion will be seen more often and less the extreme of genital surgery.



My own path was somewhat shortcircuited becuase before I went to my first meeting with a psychologist I had been out for 2 years , was a reguler contributer to gay and transgender press and had been on the board of two gender organizations



Medical care today for transgedered is so much better today. My first visit with an endocrenologist was in the basement of the Dr's house a 10pm. I was given a physical on a sheet covered couch in the family room of the basement. My orchidectomy(castration) was done off the books for $1K under the table after hours. I was given local anaethetic and was released immediately after surgery to drive myself home. with no follow up visit after surgery. Two days later my empty scrotal sac swelled to the size of a softball and I was rushed to the emergency room My first bilateral mamioplasty ended very bad with terrible infection and the breast implant literally fell out into my lap one night while I watched TV. The surgoen I had in Thailand who did my gender reassignment surgery was able to reinstall the implants and was very supportive during my whole stay in Thailand. This was the state of medical care for TG's 15 years ago.

Nativeson
5/17/08
6:54 AM
QUOTE


There were at least nine Senate Republicans and more than that number of Senate Democrats who wanted a good reason to vote against the bill or weaken it dramatically.



This really is the story. This bunch in Harrisburg either are anti-traditional values or have them and are acting like they've had orchidectomies to try to appear to be sophisticated and modern, which makes them scoundrels. May we have the names please, of the ones who wanted to weaken the bill? It sounds like Harrisburg again needs more input from the people, i.e. the pay raise.

Meanwhile some time ago I followed Mr. Smart's source for a blog post through blogdom and I have to say it was the intellectual equivilent of having my head where the sun doesn't shine, which is a heck of a price to pay to hear the "throw traditional values under the bus" crowd's thoughts. But it explained why Gil's down with the perverse representation of most people's opposition to men marrying men and raising a family. You need to broaden your understanding of the opposition coalitions, Gil if you're going to go to bat for gay marriage intelligently.

QUOTE


Got that? It was a bill not just to ”protect marriage” - it was specifically designed to strip rights from gays.



Got it. They used to be able to buy cars and homes together and they couldn't do that anymore. rolleyes.gif Please.

dragonrider
5/17/08
7:11 AM
Can you feel the love of another conservative christian reaching out to me. Let me bask in its glow awhile. Why it feels as warm as a fall freezing rain.
Nativeson
5/17/08
7:24 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 17 2008, 07:11 AM) [snapback]390349[/snapback]
Can you feel the love of another conservative christian reaching out to me. Let me bask in its glow awhile. Why it feels as warm as a fall freezing rain.


That's not rain! biggrin.gif Is dark sarcasm still allowed?

dragonrider
5/17/08
7:29 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 17 2008, 07:24 AM) [snapback]390353[/snapback]


That's not rain! biggrin.gif Is dark sarcasm still allowed?

And I bet you go to a conservative church every sunday to get that big ole sunny disposition.
2fat2ride
5/17/08
7:31 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 17 2008, 06:54 AM) [snapback]390347[/snapback]


This really is the story. This bunch in Harrisburg either are anti-traditional values or have them and are acting like they've had orchidectomies to try to appear to be sophisticated and modern, which makes them scoundrels. May we have the names please, of the ones who wanted to weaken the bill? It sounds like Harrisburg again needs more input from the people, i.e. the pay raise.




Actually, I think that the real story is how the false concept of "traditional values" has been placed into so many people's cognitive vocabulary. "Traditional values" is a propaganda motif. It is used by those who wish to simplify the complex cultural world into a nifty little "right and wrong" worldview. This is done to attract the endorsement of non-critical thinkers. Actually, I would go one step further and suggest that it is designed to turn people into non-critical thinkers.

Anyone who has even briefly studied values or culture in American history realizes quickly that there is very little "traditional" about them. Most people who are discussing "traditonal values" really just mean the values of their parents. And I am not about to carry on another generation of making all the same mistakes they did.

Culture and values always, always, always, always evolve. There's no getting around that. Politicians who make any claim about enacting legislation regarding "tradtional values" are fools. They are either non-critical thinkers with a limited understanding of the world and American history, or worse, Gil is correct and they are using "traditonal values" legislation as a tool to make all the sheeple go, "Baahhhhh."

bigstew
5/17/08
8:05 AM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 17 2008, 07:31 AM) [snapback]390357[/snapback]




Actually, I think that the real story is how the false concept of "traditional values" has been placed into so many people's cognitive vocabulary. "Traditional values" is a propaganda motif. It is used by those who wish to simplify the complex cultural world into a nifty little "right and wrong" worldview. This is done to attract the endorsement of non-critical thinkers. Actually, I would go one step further and suggest that it is designed to turn people into non-critical thinkers.

Anyone who has even briefly studied values or culture in American history realizes quickly that there is very little "traditional" about them. Most people who are discussing "traditonal values" really just mean the values of their parents. And I am not about to carry on another generation of making all the same mistakes they did.

Culture and values always, always, always, always evolve. There's no getting around that. Politicians who make any claim about enacting legislation regarding "tradtional values" are fools. They are either non-critical thinkers with a limited understanding of the world and American history, or worse, Gil is correct and they are using "traditonal values" legislation as a tool to make all the sheeple go, "Baahhhhh."

Or it could be that some people are comfortable with the world they grew up in. Why try to box everyone in to such a narrow view of the world?
Wonder
5/17/08
8:09 AM
Please keep reading beyond the first paragraph !!!

Thanks BigMac2 for being right about me. Although I believe there is no genetic proof of homosexuality and certainly do not see any proof of transgender issues [from years of study of the topic related to child studies and suicide prevention....yup...I know that there are a lot of suicide deaths relating to the issues of homosexuality], I do not mean any harm. Perhaps the emoticon was not a good choice. I believed the smile.gif was a bit more neutral than the dry.gif [suspicious did not fit], the blink.gif [goofy did not fit] or the rolleyes.gif [this one seemed sarcastic].

How is this one? huh.gif [Yes, this one looks confused...I edit to this one]. OR NONE would have probably been the best choice.

Okay. Here is the thing. In my studying, I have found that with DNA testing there is the result of either MALE or FEMALE but not both. This is the result even when both male and female organs are evident. While some will say that DNA testing would open up another kettle of worms, the consequences of adult promiscuity by the mother are of no concern to me compared to the confusion that surrounds sexual identity issues. The child should not suffer because the adult has something to hide. With DNA testing, that certain population who grow up confused, would not do so. The "feeling" that you have always been the opposite gender than the one you were named at birth, would not be an issue. My position on this issue is not one of malace. I am always on the side of the child. If treatment is begun at birth [ first by appropriate identification of gender], the first stage may be the shock experienced by parents but the adults will adjust. Then the appropriate treatments will result in the child being treated appropriately from the get-go. There will then be no need for traumatic treatment later in life to be what you were born to be.

I hope this clears up my position about some things. Thanks, BigMac2 for following though with your perceptions of me and allowing me this explaination of a sensitive issue. I was a quiet child. I listened and paid attention to the world as it appeared to me. As I got older I paid even more attention to the dispair that lead some people to feel the need to drink to access, take drugs to the point of destruction and otherwise to merely choose to end their life. I knew at a young age that it had to start out as a child. I saw many of the same patterns in children that I saw in adults even before I could verbalize or understand what I saw. If I had been born rich, I may have helped the world on a larger scale. I hope that my observations and studies have at least helped those with whom I came into contact in my chosen work over the years. ph34r.gif <--- this one seems safe.

dragonrider
5/17/08
8:17 AM
I kniew I could smell the deep thinking of big stew coming or was that his dirty diaper get them confused you know.

Wonder, there are an awful lot of transgendered people out their whose DNA XX or XY do not match their perceived gender. One explanation for this from studies I have seen is hormonal wash during gestation. A simple DNA test for XX or XY will not answer the issue at birth.
Wonder
5/17/08
8:47 AM
Think scientifically. I am not talking about hormonal wash...whatever that is...I am talking about DNA [programmed at the time of conception].

In my opinion there is no good reason for a person to become something they are not. That is carrying self-mutilation to the extreme. I am talking about DNA testing so that people can be or become what they ARE programmed to be. That may be true of you, in my way of thinking, Dragonrider, so please do not see offense.

I know of a situation where a person went through the whole transgender process. HE believed his family was adjusted but they were not. I happened to be in a position, or in several positions at the time, where I saw proof that the family was not adjusted. The "adjustment" was just another fantasy the subject needed to believe in his [to her] delusional self. Why not start the process in the beginning, so that innocent people do not have to suffer for the wants and desires of one person who could have been helped. The information was not available even 20 years ago but now it is out there so there is no excuse for the next generation. We need to deal with real issues and not legislate a continuance on the wrong path.

I realize there is confusion and turmoil in the homosexual community. We need to provide appropriate medical and psychological care so that real issues are dealt with....bullying of individuals from a young age on up, dysfunctional families, acohol/substance abuse and physical and sexual abuse of children. Then we can return to the time when there were fewer individuals who believed the only answer was the homosexual lifestyle. Life choices should not be so easy for anyone by the way. I am not just picking on those who choose the homosexual lifestyle.

Okay. You discounted what I said immediately, Dragonrider. I am done. It could be that someone knows something.

If no one listens, I move on.....

UNTIL THE NEXT TIME. wink.gif
dragonrider
5/17/08
8:59 AM
I am a tad confused not dismissive.



Are you saying that homosexuals need medical and psychological care to overcome bullying , alcohol/drug abuse, sexual abuse etc in order to become straight. Are you saying you know of some genetic test to identify gender identity beyond genetic test of xx and xy.



your post are a little confusing to me perhaps its my fault. As far as offense ussually I take no offense of peoples differing opinions I just take offense of people denying me my rights.

Bigmaclender2
5/17/08
10:02 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 17 2008, 08:47 AM) [snapback]390374[/snapback]
Think scientifically. I am not talking about hormonal wash...whatever that is...I am talking about DNA [programmed at the time of conception].

In my opinion there is no good reason for a person to become something they are not. That is carrying self-mutilation to the extreme. I am talking about DNA testing so that people can be or become what they ARE programmed to be. That may be true of you, in my way of thinking, Dragonrider, so please do not see offense.

I know of a situation where a person went through the whole transgender process. HE believed his family was adjusted but they were not. I happened to be in a position, or in several positions at the time, where I saw proof that the family was not adjusted. The "adjustment" was just another fantasy the subject needed to believe in his [to her] delusional self. Why not start the process in the beginning, so that innocent people do not have to suffer for the wants and desires of one person who could have been helped. The information was not available even 20 years ago but now it is out there so there is no excuse for the next generation. We need to deal with real issues and not legislate a continuance on the wrong path.

I realize there is confusion and turmoil in the homosexual community. We need to provide appropriate medical and psychological care so that real issues are dealt with....bullying of individuals from a young age on up, dysfunctional families, acohol/substance abuse and physical and sexual abuse of children. Then we can return to the time when there were fewer individuals who believed the only answer was the homosexual lifestyle. Life choices should not be so easy for anyone by the way. I am not just picking on those who choose the homosexual lifestyle.

Okay. You discounted what I said immediately, Dragonrider. I am done. It could be that someone knows something.

If no one listens, I move on.....

UNTIL THE NEXT TIME. wink.gif




I agree with what you are saying (in my case, anyways). Here's the situation though, Wonder. I was on the adoption block at birth. I was born at a private hospital with little funding especially for something of this nature. My biological mother was 14 when she had me. I was adopted into A VERY STRICT Catholic family (they still had mass in Latin) and said the rosary together as a family,etc. Where did that leave me at that point????



If I had DNA testing as an infant and they found predominant male instead of female and rectified the problem I would have been much happier so far and my new parents would have been much more loving and accepting of me. It sure is easier to live with yourself and others when you know exactly who you are. I'll give you that much. I'm here today by no choice of my own and I was born that way and you know it. I have two children-one is 27 years old and one is seven years old. I'm not about to put them through all of that. I, on the other hand, think of others besides myself and how I feel. You may not agree with homosexuality but all I'm asking is that you tolerate it. I don't push myself off on anyone outside of cyberspace-honestly. I know that you think you feel an obligation to your God to spread his word but I don't think that's what he meant. He did say that he is the one to judge others and not man. Let's say that I kill myself because I constantly got harrassed by you and I had nowhere to turn. What would that make you then? We should teach all of this world to love one another as I have loved you and let the final "scientific explanations" be left to God. This world would be a much nicer place if everyone just got along and focused on themselves and no one else. Would you at least agree with that?


Please understand that I mean nothing to harm you-I'm merely just giving hypothetical situations to help understand where it is that I am coming from. You know that I am okay with you and have no hard feelings. You also know that this is a VERY sensitive subject for me. Thanks for the posts.........


littledutchboy
5/17/08
11:02 AM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 17 2008, 10:02 AM) [snapback]390400[/snapback]




I agree with what you are saying (in my case, anyways). Here's the situation though, Wonder. I was on the adoption block at birth. I was born at a private hospital with little funding especially for something of this nature. My biological mother was 14 when she had me. I was adopted into A VERY STRICT Catholic family (they still had mass in Latin) and said the rosary together as a family,etc. Where did that leave me at that point????



If I had DNA testing as an infant and they found predominant male instead of female and rectified the problem I would have been much happier so far and my new parents would have been much more loving and accepting of me. It sure is easier to live with yourself and others when you know exactly who you are. I'll give you that much. I'm here today by no choice of my own and I was born that way and you know it. I have two children-one is 27 years old and one is seven years old. I'm not about to put them through all of that. I, on the other hand, think of others besides myself and how I feel. You may not agree with homosexuality but all I'm asking is that you tolerate it. I don't push myself off on anyone outside of cyberspace-honestly. I know that you think you feel an obligation to your God to spread his word but I don't think that's what he meant. He did say that he is the one to judge others and not man. Let's say that I kill myself because I constantly got harrassed by you and I had nowhere to turn. What would that make you then? We should teach all of this world to love one another as I have loved you and let the final "scientific explanations" be left to God. This world would be a much nicer place if everyone just got along and focused on themselves and no one else. Would you at least agree with that?


Please understand that I mean nothing to harm you-I'm merely just giving hypothetical situations to help understand where it is that I am coming from. You know that I am okay with you and have no hard feelings. You also know that this is a VERY sensitive subject for me. Thanks for the posts.........






Sorry but I think your posted comments, ( as I highlighted) speak to a psychological causation for your gender confusion and not genetic or hormonal. My guess is that you play the female, ( submissive ) role in your relationships as a way to receive the love, attention and acceptance you feel you missed as a child.



Predominantly male? Genetically there is no predominantly, you either are a male or you are not.



Did you catch the OW show a few weeks back? A woman changing her identity to a man with hormone therapy, now pregnant. That person made me sick, and the real shame is that there will be a child involved in that pycho sexual behavior. sad.gif







Bigmaclender2
5/17/08
1:04 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 17 2008, 11:02 AM) [snapback]390415[/snapback]




Sorry but I think your posted comments, ( as I highlighted) speak to a psychological causation for your gender confusion and not genetic or hormonal. My guess is that you play the female, ( submissive ) role in your relationships as a way to receive the love, attention and acceptance you feel you missed as a child.

[/size]

[size="3"]Predominantly male? Genetically there is no predominantly, you either are a male or you are not.

Did you catch the OW show a few weeks back? A woman changing her identity to a man with hormone therapy, now pregnant. That person made me sick, and the real shame is that there will be a child involved in that pycho sexual behavior. sad.gif




Once again, you are way off the mark. I know that you try your hardest but you aren't even in the same town as the ballpark let alone the same ballpark. I was supposed to be a man. All my friends are straight men. I don't have many gay friends. I identify as a female in body only. As for my tending to be like a female in my relationships to receive the love, attention and acceptance that I didn't receive as a child......well.........way off the mark, sorry. You are completely wrong. If you really need to know.......I have been with over at least 60 or 70 women (almost all of them have been straight or Bisexual) with the exception of 2. All straight women say there's just something about me that intriques them and they are totally attracted to me. They also tell me that no other man has ever made love to them as completely as I have................since you felt the need to know...........

dragonrider
5/17/08
2:56 PM
LDB your ignorance and hate speak volumes about you that no bible concordance ever could. And like you say about the man on OW your hate and ignorance make me want to visit the porcelein throne to worship the god of upchuck
SproutingUp
5/17/08
3:17 PM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 02:39 AM) [snapback]389318[/snapback]


Oh, and by the by, if you don't want someone to think you're quoting them, don't use their wording. laugh.gif




All the homophobes use the exact same wording, so it's impossible to not use the wording they used. It's a script.



QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 08:22 AM) [snapback]389357[/snapback]


I am sorry you have had bad experiences with churches in your past. The experiences you listed are sad examples of how not to show love for another person.

However, assuming that all Christians are like that just because some Christians were unkind to you is stereotyping. Say a person visits the ocean for the first time, having never actually seen the ocean, but having been told that there are white sandy beaches on the ocean, and the place they visit happens to be lined with rocks instead of sand. They could assume that what they have been told is a lie, or they could keep looking for another beach.


Then perhaps you should extend an invitation to dragonrider to visit your church with you to show that your church isn't a group of hatred.

That would prove the point easily. Then dragonrider would know if you are telling the truth or just covering it up. Maybe you would pick up a new member if it was loving and inviting like you say it is.



QUOTE(dee @ May 15 2008, 08:59 AM) [snapback]389372[/snapback]


Would you like to share your viewpoint on the issue and discuss it or would you just like to jump in on our discussion and make disparaging marks against me?





You know darn well that stew would much rather jump in and make disparaging remarks!! laugh.gif cool.gif

dragonrider
5/17/08
3:17 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 17 2008, 03:16 PM) [snapback]390470[/snapback]




All the homophobes use the exact same wording, so it's impossible to not use the wording they used. It's a script. LOL you really cracked me up.





Then perhaps you should extend an invitation to dragonrider to visit your church with you to show that your church isn't a group of hatred.

That would prove the point easily. Then dragonrider would know if you are telling the truth or just covering it up. Maybe you would pick up a new member if it was loving and inviting like you say it is.

SproutingUp
5/17/08
3:19 PM
QUOTE(johnq @ May 15 2008, 08:31 AM) [snapback]389359[/snapback]
I had a homosexual cousin who died of AIDS in 1990. He was also a strict practicing Catholic. When he became too ill to attend Mass, one of the priests and several members of his Congregation came to his house and performed Mass there. That is an example of the kind of love that exists in some churches.




That's wonderful that he had a supportive church. Now, would your church do it? Would you, personally do it? Would you accept him into your church if you knew he was gay (and let's say celibate and devout to staying celibate) beforehand?

dragonrider
5/17/08
3:22 PM
Which is why I never show Stew any respect anymore, nor LDB

You know when I really could have used the support of the christian church where were they helping me or slamming the door in my face. Slamming the door in my face.

SproutingUp
5/17/08
3:38 PM
[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288'] Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.

Sheesh...My wife told me tonight that she doesn't want a dog, but I want a dog...we disagree...that must mean we hate each other. [/quote]



No, it means your wife doesn't like/want dogs. The hatred is conferred to what it is you're arguing ABOUT


[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']
I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Note the word "friends" in that sentence...obviously, I must hate them if they are my friends. They knew I disagreed with their lifestyle, but we never made it an issue. We've lost touch over time, but I know if we were to meet again, it would still be as friends. [/quote]

Friends....that fell out of touch...


[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']
Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer. [/quote]

Because there are over a thousand legal privaledges given to married couples that are not given to unmarried couples. They deserve to get the same rights as any other couple does. Being of the same gender is a civil discrimination keeping them from doing so.

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

[quote]
You mean like making laws that say certain people can't be married like they did against blacks/whites not too many years ago that was overturned?



[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']
Do I think God recognizes the union of a homosexual couple whether they claim to be married or not? Well, that's His business, not mine. [/quote]

My CHRISTIAN church says he does.




[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']

I believe homosexuality is a sin; [/quote]

I disagree and believe it isn't.



[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']


however, I also believe murder, rape, incest, lust, gluttony, gossip, slander, etc. are sins. No one sin is any worse in God's eyes than another. Jesus Himself said "it is not the healthy who need a physician, but the sick." Funny...seems to me that he was falsely accused too...Seems to me He also said that the greatest commandment is to "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and the second is like unto it, Love your neighbor as yourself."[/quote]

that would include your homosexual neighbors.

There are sins you didn't list that are practiced in this country every day. Is that because you don't see them as sins or because it would name you a sinner?



[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']

So Gil (and any of you others out there who want to try to twist everything into an emotional argument by calling someone a hatemonger when they disagree with you), they are certainly some people out there who are deluded in their thinking, who do hate others based upon their choices in life. They are not indicative of the bulk of Conservative Christians. Most of us do our best to reach out to anyone struggling with sin of any kind, through the love of Christ, not through any idea that we are better than they.

Your tactics are very tiresome and more than a little childish.
[/quote]



Again, I disagree.



QUOTE(Scout @ May 15 2008, 02:02 PM) [snapback]389594[/snapback]


Lemme guess, you have one of the t-shirts that says on the back "If you can read this, the b*tch fell off"? laugh.gif





I'm still not gettin rid of my shirt!!



QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 02:17 PM) [snapback]389604[/snapback]
LDB, I have seen many reasoned discussions here from the left to which you reply with some non sequetir or hate. So I think the same can be said of the right.



Rural I have found a church but you can be sure it is not a conservative church nor do I include and conservative christians among my friends, You see the problem arises thus, A conservative christian says my "lifestyle" is a "choice". That this choice can and should be legislated against just like polygamy, beastiality or pedophilia.

Now first and foremost I see Homosexuality and transgenderism as something I was born with . I never chose nor did any of my gay friends chose to be gay or transgendered. They just are gay , just as you are straight. you never chose to be straight. Now when I am told that conservative christians want to legislate against homosexuality and I know I have no choice but to be what I am I hear them saying they want to legislate me out of existance to in effect end my life. Secondly when I am repeatedly compared to polygamists and pedophiles , I feel greatly insulted. So I respond with rightous indignation becuase I feel threatened and insulted. This is not hate this is rightous indignation for my life being denigrated and my rights being legislated away.

When I came out I was shot at, someone tried to run me over with a car, My tires were slashed, nails place under my tires, hate messages put on my car and workplace. I have a real reason to feel physically threatened by the response from the christian conservative Transgendered people have the highest percentage of hate crimes against them of any minority and most acts of violence are massive overkill where the victim is repeatedly stabbed and beaten.





To speak to dragonrider's position. Even in some gay communities, there is still hatred toward the transgendered by many members. They have the added stigma of not only being homosexual, but being in a body that is of a different gender than what they were meant to be. They do have many difficulties that go even beyond being gay and suffer even more than the general gay population does. I imagine dragonrider's life has been filled with hatred from people from every direction, nothing could be harder than having the entire world against you when you are doing nothing that harms another living soul.

It took me a while to undertand it, and befriending several transgendered people in order to do so. I "didn't get it" but it wasn't because of them, it was because I wasn't letting myself "get it". I had to reach out and listen to them and understand what they were saying before I "got it". Now I'm able to count various transgendered people as very good friends of mine because I took the time to listen to and understand what they were telling me.



QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 02:18 PM) [snapback]389605[/snapback]
My point is very simple. There are many marriages out there that are doing great. Too often I see the picture painted that marriages are in trouble, or need fixed. It is a blanket statement that is not accurate, in my opinion.........




How about the gay marriages that are "doing great"? Do they not deserve the same as you do?



QUOTE(Wonder @ May 16 2008, 02:10 AM) [snapback]389854[/snapback]
How can you be BORN transgendered? smile.gif





A boy born in a girls body or the other way around. It happens because of the level of certain hormones in the womb during pregnancy. Google it, read it, then google it some more and you may understand.

Bigby_M
5/17/08
3:53 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 17 2008, 01:04 PM) [snapback]390437[/snapback]




They also tell me that no other man has ever made love to them as completely as I have................since you felt the need to know...........



Are you interesting in a tutoring job? laugh.gif

SproutingUp
5/17/08
4:03 PM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 17 2008, 08:05 AM) [snapback]390360[/snapback]
Or it could be that some people are comfortable with the world they grew up in. Why try to box everyone in to such a narrow view of the world?




The world you grew up in is gone. Most of us learned that when we became adults, went to college, perhaps living in a different town or state when we got our first career opportunity that went with our degree and then came back home to "visit". It was crystal clear that the world we grew up in was in the past and the future, even the present is now the world our children or grandchildren are growing up in. It would be foolish and malicious to want things to never change. Time marches on, and will continue to do so. The worst casualty is those who refuse to move forward with it.

I guess this is the biggest thing for "conservative christians". They want to keep Mayberry. Mayberry is gone, but it doesn't mean that the same peace, frienliness and satisfaction can't be found outside of Mayberry. Andy Taylor retired long ago, Opie grew up and became Richie, then became Ron Howard, the director. Life is not a snapshot to be preserved for ever more, it is an ongoing process that will change not only from year to year but from moment to moment. We either change with it, or we become overpowered by nostalgia, unable to go any further until we end up in the cemetary and the rest of the world still keeps right on moving.

How can we help you to understand? How can we help you to move forward? How can we ease the fear you hold deep inside? We're not taking your "Mayberry" away, your Mayberry is already gone. How can we help you to accept your "Lancaster" or whatever city/area you live in as it exists in the present?

SproutingUp
5/17/08
4:15 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 17 2008, 11:02 AM) [snapback]390415[/snapback]




Sorry but I think your posted comments, ( as I highlighted) speak to a psychological causation for your gender confusion and not genetic or hormonal. My guess is that you play the female, ( submissive ) role in your relationships as a way to receive the love, attention and acceptance you feel you missed as a child.





Very few women today are "submissive". That's just another of your problems.

Guess what!! There's more than one sexual position!! Really!!!

Some even involve the woman being on top!