The hate loses

May 14th, 2008 11:36 am · 193 comments

I’m not quite sure why I can’t find this online anywhere, but if you have a chance check out Peter DeCoursey’s column on the editorial page of today’s Intell, where he writes about how state Sen. Vince Fumo used a little legislative ju-jitsu to defeat Sen. Mike Brubaker’s “Hate The Gay” bill:

There were at least nine Senate Republicans and more than that number of Senate Democrats who wanted a good reason to vote against the bill or weaken it dramatically.

Fumo gave them that reason by highlighting the provision in the ban on giving gay couples rights “equivalent” to marriage. That was so broad, Fumo knew he could command sufficient support to amend it…

<snip>

As one Republican senator told me: “I am fine with defining marrage as being between one man and one woman. I am not fine with taking away rights gays have now, from the government or from their employer, because they are people.”

Well, not to Brubaker - or rather, not to Brubaker’s contituents. Because, see, while a legislative staffer assured DeCoursey that it’s not Brubaker who has a problem with gays, it’s that “he represents a lot of anti-gay Republicans in Lancaster. This was a bill to please poeple who think gays are sinful and want to reduce the rights and benefits they get now.”

Got that? It was a bill not just to ”protect marriage” - it was specifically designed to strip rights from gays. Because we here in Lancaster County - or lots of Republicans here in Lancaster County - don’t merely want gays to be prevented from getting more rights. We want them to have fewer rights; we want to take away the ones they already have.

But they lost. Again. And DeCoursey’s piece makes clear that however angry the local wingers might be - however the likes of Brubaker may try to go to bat on behalf of that hatred - the legislature on the whole, perhaps reflecting Pennsylvania on the whole - isn’t into taking away people’s rights, regardless of whom they sleep with.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  193 comments  Tags: Gay marriage · Homosexuality · Pennsylvania

There are currently 193 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
dragonrider
5/14/08
1:57 PM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ May 14 2008, 11:40 AM) [snapback]388993[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
Off course this has always been the intent to remove rights from gays, Some will openly admit that that is their intent others need to stoop to this type of subterfuge. obviously if the intent was to protect marriage the first thing you would look at would be the astronomical rates of divorce and the rampant cohabitation. These two items are destroying marriage by heterosexuals for heterosexuals.



I wrote in a previous blog about a letter to the editor in the NY Times which really struck me. Incarcerated criminals have more rights to marry than I do. They do not have the right to vote even after release on federal crimes. But they can get married even while still incarcerated, Rapist, spouse abusers, pedophiles, child abusers, mass murderers all can get married even while incarcerated but I who has never been convicted or charged with any crime whose only fault is loving someone of the same gender can never marry.



This type of subterfuge of naming a bill of to make it palatable has been a tool in use for a least two decades. One needs only listen to the sponsors to hear the true meaning of the bills.

littledutchboy
5/14/08
2:41 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 14 2008, 01:57 PM) [snapback]389082[/snapback]
Off course this has always been the intent to remove rights from gays, Some will openly admit that that is their intent others need to stoop to this type of subterfuge. obviously if the intent was to protect marriage the first thing you would look at would be the astronomical rates of divorce and the rampant cohabitation. These two items are destroying marriage by heterosexuals for heterosexuals.



I wrote in a previous blog about a letter to the editor in the NY Times which really struck me. Incarcerated criminals have more rights to marry than I do. They do not have the right to vote even after release on federal crimes. But they can get married even while still incarcerated, Rapist, spouse abusers, pedophiles, child abusers, mass murderers all can get married even while incarcerated but I who has never been convicted or charged with any crime whose only fault is loving someone of the same gender can never marry.



This type of subterfuge of naming a bill of to make it palatable has been a tool in use for a least two decades. One needs only listen to the sponsors to hear the true meaning of the bills.





Subterfuge? There is no subterfuge about it; the amendment states that marriage is defined as being between 1 man and 1 woman and that this status will not be extended to any other combination. Sounds straight foreword to me.



Gay unions are not recognized now in any way so how are rights being taken away from this group? They’re not, but it sounds better to say they are, gays hope to get victim status to further their cause.



This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring, state laws says NO, so NO it is! Calling people that don’t go along with the gay lifestyle names is childish and very transparent.









dee
5/14/08
2:54 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 14 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]389116[/snapback]




This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring,





So are your posts that say the SAME thing every time you mention the topic. How about discussing it openly, not reiterating the same point time after time after time. . . . we get it already. Now if you really want to convince anybody that you are right, broaden your points, tell us more. Just don't beat us over the head with the same info each and every post.

dragonrider
5/14/08
2:55 PM
Actually the bill also says no to conferring any rights to civil unions which could have a significant erosion of rights not just for homosexuals but also heterosexuals in terms of adoption, hospital visitation, inheritance company benefits such as health insurance. But your ignorance of facts is as profound as your statements are lacking LDB perhaps you should find time to educate yourself before speaking

But hey I do agree that all this fighting for special rights is tiresome so why not extend the special rights of white male heterosexuals to all people then you can be unbothered.

Pericles
5/14/08
3:06 PM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ May 14 2008, 11:40 AM) [snapback]388993[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.


You're analysis is absolutely absurd Gil.

A senate staffer actually told a reporter that Brubaker respects gays, but Brubaker was representing the will of Lancaster County Republicans who hate gays? That's what you're basing this on? It's absolute nonsense.

But since someone wrote it, it must be true. Now where is the outrage from all these gay haters since the bill was defeated?

And since the bill was defeated:

How many letters to the editors were written by these gay haters?

How many protests were organized by these haters?
grieker
5/14/08
3:06 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 14 2008, 02:55 PM) [snapback]389127[/snapback]
special rights of white male heterosexuals


Do tell, what are they?

Bigmaclender2
5/14/08
3:09 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 14 2008, 02:55 PM) [snapback]389127[/snapback]
Actually the bill also says no to conferring any rights to civil unions which could have a significant erosion of rights not just for homosexuals but also heterosexuals in terms of adoption, hospital visitation, inheritance company benefits such as health insurance. But your ignorance of facts is as profound as your statements are lacking LDB perhaps you should find time to educate yourself before speaking

But hey I do agree that all this fighting for special rights is tiresome so why not extend the special rights of white male heterosexuals to all people then you can be unbothered.





OUCH!!! (true, but still, ouch!) hee hee good one...........



QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 14 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]389116[/snapback]

Subterfuge? There is no subterfuge about it; the amendment states that marriage is defined as being between 1 man and 1 woman and that this status will not be extended to any other combination. Sounds straight foreword to me.

Gay unions are not recognized now in any way so how are rights being taken away from this group? They're not, but it sounds better to say they are, gays hope to get victim status to further their cause.

This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring, state laws says NO, so NO it is! Calling people that don't go along with the gay lifestyle names is childish and very transparent.




At one time blacks had no rights either-NO-so NO it was...............

It's coming, LDB...........I can't wait to hear what you have to say when it does........

bigstew
5/14/08
7:15 PM
QUOTE(dee @ May 14 2008, 02:54 PM) [snapback]389124[/snapback]




So are your posts that say the SAME thing every time you mention the topic. How about discussing it openly, not reiterating the same point time after time after time. . . . we get it already. Now if you really want to convince anybody that you are right, broaden your points, tell us more. Just don't beat us over the head with the same info each and every post.

That goes both ways.
Bigmaclender2
5/14/08
7:56 PM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 14 2008, 07:15 PM) [snapback]389225[/snapback]
That goes both ways.




Would that make it a "bi-sexual" conversation???????

LOL

Bigby_M
5/14/08
8:48 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 14 2008, 02:41 PM) [snapback]389116[/snapback]




Subterfuge? There is no subterfuge about it; the amendment states that marriage is defined as being between 1 man and 1 woman and that this status will not be extended to any other combination. Sounds straight foreword to me.

[/size]

Gay unions are not recognized now in any way so how are rights being taken away from this group? They're not, but it sounds better to say they are, gays hope to get victim status to further their cause.



[size="3"]This whole gay marriage thing is really starting to get boring, state laws says NO, so NO it is! Calling people that don't go along with the gay lifestyle names is childish and very transparent.












LDB hasn't it occured to you yet that this article was about you and your fellow travelers?



QUOTE(Pericles @ May 14 2008, 03:06 PM) [snapback]389133[/snapback]


How many letters to the editors were written by these gay haters?

How many protests were organized by these haters?


So they don't have the guts to come out and say so, what a surprise.

Who would have thought they were snivelers?

Well me for one . laugh.gif

Rural Conservative
5/15/08
12:40 AM
Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.

Sheesh...My wife told me tonight that she doesn't want a dog, but I want a dog...we disagree...that must mean we hate each other.

I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Note the word "friends" in that sentence...obviously, I must hate them if they are my friends. They knew I disagreed with their lifestyle, but we never made it an issue. We've lost touch over time, but I know if we were to meet again, it would still be as friends.

Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer.

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

Do I think God recognizes the union of a homosexual couple whether they claim to be married or not? Well, that's His business, not mine.

I believe homosexuality is a sin; however, I also believe murder, rape, incest, lust, gluttony, gossip, slander, etc. are sins. No one sin is any worse in God's eyes than another. Jesus Himself said "it is not the healthy who need a physician, but the sick." Funny...seems to me that he was falsely accused too...Seems to me He also said that the greatest commandment is to "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and the second is like unto it, Love your neighbor as yourself."

So Gil (and any of you others out there who want to try to twist everything into an emotional argument by calling someone a hatemonger when they disagree with you), they are certainly some people out there who are deluded in their thinking, who do hate others based upon their choices in life. They are not indicative of the bulk of Conservative Christians. Most of us do our best to reach out to anyone struggling with sin of any kind, through the love of Christ, not through any idea that we are better than they.

Your tactics are very tiresome and more than a little childish.
dragonrider
5/15/08
1:02 AM
Well there you go I should stop wanting to be able to visit my partner in the hospital, share medical decisions with her, wanting to inherit from her, coadopt a child with her, share my health insurance with her, claim her on my income tax to name a few of the special rights of marriage given by governmental marriage. Becuase to want to have my relationship treated equally with yours is just childish and tiresome. And to expect US to live up to the words of the constitution that all people are created equal and endowed with equal rights from our creator is just boring.

Frankly I could care less what some conservative church feels about my relationship to quote Jesus I would shake the dust off my feet from any such church. Keep your religous marriage just extend to me the same rights and responsibilities

Thankfully the history of the US is the expansion of rights to a wider range of minorities and the stands against treating all people as equal always fails.

Rural Conservative
5/15/08
1:23 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 01:02 AM) [snapback]389293[/snapback]
...Becuase to want to have my relationship treated equally with yours is just childish and tiresome...


There ya went and proved my point. Instead of actually reading what I wrote with a will to understand, you went and twisted my words into something that was not written, nor implied, in order to serve your own agenda.

My post was about people who claim that anyone who disagrees with them must hate them. Your response has nothing to do with what I wrote, and instead proves my point by making the same implications that Mr. Smart has made.
dragonrider
5/15/08
2:08 AM
Sorry Rural you construed my post as response to you it was to LDB who did characterize my desire for equal rights as boring and childish.

As far as most conservative christians and conservative churches reaching out to homosexuals I would most strongly disagree. I have heard enough from conservative christians that can only be characterized as hate. Such as the recent politician who said gays desire for equal rights are worse than Islamic terrorists How can I characterize such a statement as anything but hate. Or the minister that likes to go around saying God Hates Fags. Or Pastor Hagee who blamed the Huricane Katrina on a gay pride event in New Orleans. Or Pastor Falwell and Robertson who said gays were the cause of 9/11 If this is reaching out in love its a very perverted love.



Rural Conservative
5/15/08
2:39 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 02:08 AM) [snapback]389313[/snapback]
Sorry Rural you construed my post as response to you it was to LDB who did characterize my desire for equal rights as boring and childish.

As far as most conservative christians and conservative churches reaching out to homosexuals I would most strongly disagree. I have heard enough from conservative christians that can only be characterized as hate. Such as the recent politician who said gays desire for equal rights are worse than Islamic terrorists How can I characterize such a statement as anything but hate. Or the minister that likes to go around saying God Hates Fags. Or Pastor Hagee who blamed the Huricane Katrina on a gay pride event in New Orleans. Or Pastor Falwell and Robertson who said gays were the cause of 9/11 If this is reaching out in love its a very perverted love.



The persons and groups you cite are a minority within conservative Christianity. It is because they are so vocal in their declamation of others that they recieve so much attention. The Westboro Baptist Church and others like them only get attention because of the media's agenda for painting all conservative Christians as evil hatemongers. Every other Christian I have spoken to about the incidences you cite, has been appalled by them.

What you don't see brought up in the media are the churches who do reach out to the homosexual community, unless it is to belittle them. I know such ministries exist, as I've spoken to persons involved in them, though I'm a bit tired at the moment and would rather sleep than search. If you do a search on AIDS relief though, you will find many Christian organizations (the one search I did found no secular groups). I know that's probably a hot button and I'm not saying that AIDS only affects homosexuals, but it does have a greater affect on the homosexual community in America than it does on others (see http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance...ic.htm#exposure for statistics if you want),

Are there conservative Christians who hate others for whatever reason? Sure there are. Are there Liberal Atheists who hate others for whatever reason? Sure there are. Do the majority of either group hate others for whatever reason? Probably not.

Again, the media (like Mr. Smart), only give us a small piece of the picture to look at. They do this because it is sensational and it gets attention. Journalism is no longer an unbiased field. It's all about selling papers or getting better TV ratings.

Oh, and by the by, if you don't want someone to think you're quoting them, don't use their wording. laugh.gif
dragonrider
5/15/08
3:00 AM
I speak about Conservative Christians and Conservative Christian Churches not just from the media but also from personal experience. The minister of the Presbyterian church in Oshkosh Wi when I came out said she could not guarantee my personal safety if I came to church, The Presbyterian Church in Appleton minister said they would disband the choir if I sang in it, that I could not join the church as the person who conducted new member class refused to have me in the class, the minister said that my presence was akin to me sexual assaulting the other member by involving them in my fetish, I will never forget being told not to come to Good Friday service as that would ruin it for everyone else.

Thats my personal story not some media with a spin. If thats is love you can have it.

Rural Conservative
5/15/08
8:22 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 03:00 AM) [snapback]389324[/snapback]

Thats my personal story not some media with a spin. If thats is love you can have it.



I am sorry you have had bad experiences with churches in your past. The experiences you listed are sad examples of how not to show love for another person.

However, assuming that all Christians are like that just because some Christians were unkind to you is stereotyping. Say a person visits the ocean for the first time, having never actually seen the ocean, but having been told that there are white sandy beaches on the ocean, and the place they visit happens to be lined with rocks instead of sand. They could assume that what they have been told is a lie, or they could keep looking for another beach.
johnq
5/15/08
8:31 AM
I had a homosexual cousin who died of AIDS in 1990. He was also a strict practicing Catholic. When he became too ill to attend Mass, one of the priests and several members of his Congregation came to his house and performed Mass there. That is an example of the kind of love that exists in some churches.
dee
5/15/08
8:59 AM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 14 2008, 07:15 PM) [snapback]389225[/snapback]
That goes both ways.


Would you like to share your viewpoint on the issue and discuss it or would you just like to jump in on our discussion and make disparaging marks against me?

LicenseForMayhem
5/15/08
9:52 AM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 12:40 AM) [snapback]389288[/snapback]
Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.



That's a very interesting point. This happens with all sorts of issues, not just ones relating to homosexuality. To me, it's a red flag when someone wants to short-circuit any meaningful dialogue by labeling those who disagree as "haters". Maybe they are afraid there is some sense in what the other person has to say, so they want to cut it off before that person has a say. Maybe they don't want to accept that an issue is not neatly black and white--gray areas are hard to navigate. Or maybe they have a vested interest in keeping the matter from being discussed rationally and settled amicably. At any rate, it's a roadblock to honest dialogue.
dragonrider
5/15/08
10:54 AM
Rural If you have not seen the movie For the Bible Tells Me So, then I might suggest you do. My experiences with conservative christians and conservative christian churches is not unigue. There remain a lot of homeless GBLT kids who were thrown out by their conservative parents.
flanagan
5/15/08
11:02 AM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 14 2008, 11:40 PM) [snapback]389288[/snapback]
Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.

Sheesh...My wife told me tonight that she doesn't want a dog, but I want a dog...we disagree...that must mean we hate each other.

I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Note the word "friends" in that sentence...obviously, I must hate them if they are my friends. They knew I disagreed with their lifestyle, but we never made it an issue. We've lost touch over time, but I know if we were to meet again, it would still be as friends.

Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer.

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

Do I think God recognizes the union of a homosexual couple whether they claim to be married or not? Well, that's His business, not mine.

I believe homosexuality is a sin; however, I also believe murder, rape, incest, lust, gluttony, gossip, slander, etc. are sins. No one sin is any worse in God's eyes than another. Jesus Himself said "it is not the healthy who need a physician, but the sick." Funny...seems to me that he was falsely accused too...Seems to me He also said that the greatest commandment is to "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and the second is like unto it, Love your neighbor as yourself."

So Gil (and any of you others out there who want to try to twist everything into an emotional argument by calling someone a hatemonger when they disagree with you), they are certainly some people out there who are deluded in their thinking, who do hate others based upon their choices in life. They are not indicative of the bulk of Conservative Christians. Most of us do our best to reach out to anyone struggling with sin of any kind, through the love of Christ, not through any idea that we are better than they.

Your tactics are very tiresome and more than a little childish.




Very well said!

littledutchboy
5/15/08
11:08 AM
QUOTE(LicenseForMayhem @ May 15 2008, 09:52 AM) [snapback]389393[/snapback]


That's a very interesting point. This happens with all sorts of issues, not just ones relating to homosexuality. To me, it's a red flag when someone wants to short-circuit any meaningful dialogue by labeling those who disagree as "haters". Maybe they are afraid there is some sense in what the other person has to say, so they want to cut it off before that person has a say. Maybe they don't want to accept that an issue is not neatly black and white--gray areas are hard to navigate. Or maybe they have a vested interest in keeping the matter from being discussed rationally and settled amicably. At any rate, it's a roadblock to honest dialogue.




“Hate speak” as used by liberal activists, is a tool used to try to gain a position in favor of a particular group. The PC news/activist template requires a clear victim and a corresponding clear oppressor. “hate speak” in the land of PC is a default reaction when there is no hope of the desired result from temperate, reasoned debate. “Civil Rights” is the 2nd default setting, everyone supports individual civil rights, but we are more then individuals, our individual actions affect others, our laws and regulations are a balancing act between individual rights and communal rights.



Is the community helped or hindered by gay marriage? At best it’s a push, but it may not be a push, it could be a negative, is it worth it to experiment?



If gays have a civil right to marry then so do polygamists and any and every combination of people who feel they have a right, how could the civil rights argument be true for one group and not the other? Pandora’s box?







2fat2ride
5/15/08
11:24 AM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 15 2008, 11:08 AM) [snapback]389436[/snapback]


Is the community helped or hindered by gay marriage? At best it's a push, but it may not be a push, it could be a negative, is it worth it to experiment?



Do you mean is it worth experimenting with a tradition in which 50% of all heterosexual marriages end in failure?

I would say it is a prime example of a tradition that needs to be experimented with, in more ways than one.

dc
5/15/08
11:46 AM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 15 2008, 11:24 AM) [snapback]389444[/snapback]
Do you mean is it worth experimenting with a tradition in which 50% of all heterosexual marriages end in failure?
I would say it is a prime example of a tradition that needs to be experimented with, in more ways than one.
My marriage is doing great. Sorry if yours is not.......
2fat2ride
5/15/08
1:57 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 11:46 AM) [snapback]389470[/snapback]
My marriage is doing great. Sorry if yours is not.......




Hey, I take my wife with me wherever I go...but somehow she keeps finding her way back.





Scout
5/15/08
2:02 PM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 15 2008, 01:57 PM) [snapback]389591[/snapback]

Hey, I take my wife with me wherever I go...but somehow she keeps finding her way back.


Lemme guess, you have one of the t-shirts that says on the back "If you can read this, the b*tch fell off"? laugh.gif

dc
5/15/08
2:07 PM
QUOTE(Scout @ May 15 2008, 02:02 PM) [snapback]389594[/snapback]
Lemme guess, you have one of the t-shirts that says on the back "If you can read this, the b*tch fell off"?
That would explain why his is not........
Shawn
5/15/08
2:14 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 11:46 AM) [snapback]389470[/snapback]
My marriage is doing great. Sorry if yours is not.......




Would your marriage be worse off if homosexuals were allowed to marry? I would expect not. I think that is the point the original poster was trying to make.


Later...Shawn

dragonrider
5/15/08
2:17 PM
LDB, I have seen many reasoned discussions here from the left to which you reply with some non sequetir or hate. So I think the same can be said of the right.



Rural I have found a church but you can be sure it is not a conservative church nor do I include and conservative christians among my friends, You see the problem arises thus, A conservative christian says my "lifestyle" is a "choice". That this choice can and should be legislated against just like polygamy, beastiality or pedophilia.

Now first and foremost I see Homosexuality and transgenderism as something I was born with . I never chose nor did any of my gay friends chose to be gay or transgendered. They just are gay , just as you are straight. you never chose to be straight. Now when I am told that conservative christians want to legislate against homosexuality and I know I have no choice but to be what I am I hear them saying they want to legislate me out of existance to in effect end my life. Secondly when I am repeatedly compared to polygamists and pedophiles , I feel greatly insulted. So I respond with rightous indignation becuase I feel threatened and insulted. This is not hate this is rightous indignation for my life being denigrated and my rights being legislated away.

When I came out I was shot at, someone tried to run me over with a car, My tires were slashed, nails place under my tires, hate messages put on my car and workplace. I have a real reason to feel physically threatened by the response from the christian conservative Transgendered people have the highest percentage of hate crimes against them of any minority and most acts of violence are massive overkill where the victim is repeatedly stabbed and beaten.

dc
5/15/08
2:18 PM
QUOTE(Shawn @ May 15 2008, 02:14 PM) [snapback]389601[/snapback]
Would your marriage be worse off if homosexuals were allowed to marry? I would expect not. I think that is the point the original poster was trying to make.
My point is very simple. There are many marriages out there that are doing great. Too often I see the picture painted that marriages are in trouble, or need fixed. It is a blanket statement that is not accurate, in my opinion.........
Shawn
5/15/08
2:20 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 02:18 PM) [snapback]389605[/snapback]
My point is very simple. There are many marriages out there that are doing great. Too often I see the picture painted that marriages are in trouble, or need fixed. It is a blanket statement that is not accurate, in my opinion.........




I think the reason you see that is because of things like a "Marriage Protection Amendment". I agree with your assement that marriage doesn't need to be protected. But with legislation like this being proposed, one has to ask, from what does marriage need to be protected from?



Later...Shawn

Goldilocks
5/15/08
3:17 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 01:17 PM) [snapback]389604[/snapback]

Transgendered people have the highest percentage of hate crimes against them of any minority and most acts of violence are massive overkill where the victim is repeatedly stabbed and beaten.


I am surprised it isn't splashed all over the news media. Could you cite your sources.



dragonrider
5/16/08
1:18 AM
I no longer have the source but I had read at one time a study that reported 100% of transgendered have suffered physical or verbal violence. I might suggest checking out Remembering our Dead site.
Wonder
5/16/08
2:10 AM
How can you be BORN transgendered? smile.gif

dragonrider
5/16/08
2:15 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 16 2008, 02:10 AM) [snapback]389854[/snapback]
How can you be BORN transgendered? smile.gif

You know what Wonder you have crossed the line. you are now on my permanent ignore. I post a response and list a site which references one murdered transexual every month as hate crime and this is your response. I finally agree this topic is useless and I will leave the gay baiting posts to others. see ya
Bigby_M
5/16/08
5:57 AM
QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 02:18 PM) [snapback]389605[/snapback]
There are many marriages out there that are doing great. .


Don't half of all marriages end in divorce? With that in mind how many are not divorcing for the sake of the children or for another reason?

While many marriages are doing great I think most are not.

I would venture to guess that 20 years hence the fidelity among gay couples will far exceed the fidelity among those typical church marriages.

What needs protection is the people from the truth about themselves. laugh.gif

This is America, dad gummit, we can't handle the truth, especially about ourselves. laugh.gif

tugrad
5/16/08
7:31 AM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 12:40 AM) [snapback]389288[/snapback]

I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer.



For the same reasons straights "need to" marry. We want to protect our children and our relationships. Marriage confers rights as well a responsiblities. We want both. Just like you do. Marriage is a public, legal way of telling the entire world that this is the person I intend to spend my life with, no one goes into thinking they will divorce. The mere act of marriage supports the couple through rough patches (and all relationships have them). It is amazing that so many gay couples stay together for so long without this public and legal support.

Bigmaclender2
5/16/08
12:05 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 16 2008, 02:15 AM) [snapback]389855[/snapback]
You know what Wonder you have crossed the line. you are now on my permanent ignore. I post a response and list a site which references one murdered transexual every month as hate crime and this is your response. I finally agree this topic is useless and I will leave the gay baiting posts to others. see ya




You know that I have agreed with all of your posts thusfar but I believe, IMOO, that you may be a bit hypersensative to that question. I can't state whether she meant any malice or not but IMO I don't think that she did. I think it was an honest question trying to understand a subject that not many have any knowledge of. I am gay and hang around T people and I don't even get the entire thing. I am being completely honest here. I am constantly asking them questions. They are also very patient with me because they know that I don't mean them harm-I am trying to educate myself. Allow her to be educated. I think I would reconsider the question and answer with the utmost honesty as you always do. For example-some men have a sex change and become a woman to be with a woman. I don't understand this and am still striving to do so. You know what I mean?

dc
5/16/08
12:10 PM
QUOTE(Bigby_M @ May 16 2008, 05:57 AM) [snapback]389870[/snapback]

Don't half of all marriages end in divorce? With that in mind how many are not divorcing for the sake of the children or for another reason?
While many marriages are doing great I think most are not.
The point is, there are many out there that are doing very well. Whether it is a majority or not, the picture seems to be portrayed that all marriages are bad. This is not the case....
Bigmaclender2
5/16/08
12:11 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 16 2008, 12:10 PM) [snapback]390060[/snapback]
The point is, there are many out there that are doing very well. Whether it is a majority or not, the picture seems to be portrayed that all marriages are bad. This is not the case....




They had to name it the "Marriage Protection Act" because they couldn't transparently name it the "No Gay Marriage Act". IMOO

dragonrider
5/16/08
2:39 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 16 2008, 12:05 PM) [snapback]390057[/snapback]




You know that I have agreed with all of your posts thusfar but I believe, IMOO, that you may be a bit hypersensative to that question. I can't state whether she meant any malice or not but IMO I don't think that she did. I think it was an honest question trying to understand a subject that not many have any knowledge of. I am gay and hang around T people and I don't even get the entire thing. I am being completely honest here. I am constantly asking them questions. They are also very patient with me because they know that I don't mean them harm-I am trying to educate myself. Allow her to be educated. I think I would reconsider the question and answer with the utmost honesty as you always do. For example-some men have a sex change and become a woman to be with a woman. I don't understand this and am still striving to do so. You know what I mean?

Perhaps you are right, if so I apologize. I tend to get cranky sometimes. But you have to admit that a recurring theme from the right is you can not be born gay or transgendered you chose to be gay or transgendered. When I was talking about the death of many transgedered and violence against transgendered and am asked that question again it did seem to get my ire.



No man can have a sex change to be with a woman!!!!! He could never get surgical approval if that was his reason. There used to be a rumor about me that I became a woman becuase my wife was a lesbian and I thought I could keep her that way. I laughed my !profanity! off when I heard that one. Some Male to Female MTF transexuals remain attracted to women post transition I count myself among that group. Some Female to Male Transexuals remain attracted to men after surgery. As a lesbian you must know that gender and sexual orientation are not synonymous.



How can one be born transgendered. I don't know nor does anyone else. I presume the same way one can be born intersexual, born with ambigous or both genitals. The brain is a very complex organ but just another organ with equal variatioan in structure as any other organ. Some people are made transsexual I am sure but this is at a very early age, gender identity is set at a very young age under age 4 from what I have read. Wether I was born transgendered or abused into by a father that sexually, physically and verbally abused me from my earliest memories is mute. Becuase now it is immutable , it is who I am and I better love who I am as this is the only life I can have.



Is that better BigMac biggrin.gif



Last night I read in the NYTimes about a Indian couple. she was pregnant and they were in their early 20's A crowd broke into their house and kicked and beat her until he awoke then the drug them both out and strangled them both on the edge of town. Their crime they violated a religous law that says a man and a woman from the same town can not marry. This is what happens when you have religous laws governing marriage Of course in middle east you have men being killed for just being in the company of a known gay man.
Bigmaclender2
5/17/08
1:00 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 16 2008, 02:39 PM) [snapback]390137[/snapback]
Perhaps you are right, if so I apologize. I tend to get cranky sometimes. But you have to admit that a recurring theme from the right is you can not be born gay or transgendered you chose to be gay or transgendered. When I was talking about the death of many transgedered and violence against transgendered and am asked that question again it did seem to get my ire.



No man can have a sex change to be with a woman!!!!! He could never get surgical approval if that was his reason. There used to be a rumor about me that I became a woman becuase my wife was a lesbian and I thought I could keep her that way. I laughed my !profanity! off when I heard that one. Some Male to Female MTF transexuals remain attracted to women post transition I count myself among that group. Some Female to Male Transexuals remain attracted to men after surgery. As a lesbian you must know that gender and sexual orientation are not synonymous.



How can one be born transgendered. I don't know nor does anyone else. I presume the same way one can be born intersexual, born with ambigous or both genitals. The brain is a very complex organ but just another organ with equal variatioan in structure as any other organ. Some people are made transsexual I am sure but this is at a very early age, gender identity is set at a very young age under age 4 from what I have read. Wether I was born transgendered or abused into by a father that sexually, physically and verbally abused me from my earliest memories is mute. Becuase now it is immutable , it is who I am and I better love who I am as this is the only life I can have.



Is that better BigMac biggrin.gif



Last night I read in the NYTimes about a Indian couple. she was pregnant and they were in their early 20's A crowd broke into their house and kicked and beat her until he awoke then the drug them both out and strangled them both on the edge of town. Their crime they violated a religous law that says a man and a woman from the same town can not marry. This is what happens when you have religous laws governing marriage Of course in middle east you have men being killed for just being in the company of a known gay man.




I didn't know that you can't get a sex change if you are a man and want to become a woman to be with a woman. I do thank you for the sweet response..........

dragonrider
5/17/08
1:52 AM
The process of changing physical genders is complex BigMac. Before even starting one needs approval of a psychologist to get an appointment with an endocrenologist. Approval from the psychologist normally takes numerous meetings over months. Some psychologist also require that you take the Minnesota multiphasic personality test. During this first step one must develope a plan of action for your public appearance as the opposite physical gender. How to tell your family, your employer, what support you have that you know will stick with you through your transition etc. These steps must all be completed before a letter is issued to allow you to begin hormonal therapy.



Before seeking surgery one must have lived one to two years in the gender of transition and have been on hormonal therapy for a year. You must establish that you have establish a stable life as the new gender. Approval must be obtained from one psychologist and one psychiatrist to get a letter of approval for surgery



To obtain approval you must prove that your transgenderism is something that has been a part of your life for a very long time. You must also establish that surgery is the only solution to this problem as opposed to living androgenously. I think in the future the androgenous obtion will be seen more often and less the extreme of genital surgery.



My own path was somewhat shortcircuited becuase before I went to my first meeting with a psychologist I had been out for 2 years , was a reguler contributer to gay and transgender press and had been on the board of two gender organizations



Medical care today for transgedered is so much better today. My first visit with an endocrenologist was in the basement of the Dr's house a 10pm. I was given a physical on a sheet covered couch in the family room of the basement. My orchidectomy(castration) was done off the books for $1K under the table after hours. I was given local anaethetic and was released immediately after surgery to drive myself home. with no follow up visit after surgery. Two days later my empty scrotal sac swelled to the size of a softball and I was rushed to the emergency room My first bilateral mamioplasty ended very bad with terrible infection and the breast implant literally fell out into my lap one night while I watched TV. The surgoen I had in Thailand who did my gender reassignment surgery was able to reinstall the implants and was very supportive during my whole stay in Thailand. This was the state of medical care for TG's 15 years ago.

Nativeson
5/17/08
6:54 AM
QUOTE


There were at least nine Senate Republicans and more than that number of Senate Democrats who wanted a good reason to vote against the bill or weaken it dramatically.



This really is the story. This bunch in Harrisburg either are anti-traditional values or have them and are acting like they've had orchidectomies to try to appear to be sophisticated and modern, which makes them scoundrels. May we have the names please, of the ones who wanted to weaken the bill? It sounds like Harrisburg again needs more input from the people, i.e. the pay raise.

Meanwhile some time ago I followed Mr. Smart's source for a blog post through blogdom and I have to say it was the intellectual equivilent of having my head where the sun doesn't shine, which is a heck of a price to pay to hear the "throw traditional values under the bus" crowd's thoughts. But it explained why Gil's down with the perverse representation of most people's opposition to men marrying men and raising a family. You need to broaden your understanding of the opposition coalitions, Gil if you're going to go to bat for gay marriage intelligently.

QUOTE


Got that? It was a bill not just to ”protect marriage” - it was specifically designed to strip rights from gays.



Got it. They used to be able to buy cars and homes together and they couldn't do that anymore. rolleyes.gif Please.

dragonrider
5/17/08
7:11 AM
Can you feel the love of another conservative christian reaching out to me. Let me bask in its glow awhile. Why it feels as warm as a fall freezing rain.
Nativeson
5/17/08
7:24 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 17 2008, 07:11 AM) [snapback]390349[/snapback]
Can you feel the love of another conservative christian reaching out to me. Let me bask in its glow awhile. Why it feels as warm as a fall freezing rain.


That's not rain! biggrin.gif Is dark sarcasm still allowed?

dragonrider
5/17/08
7:29 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 17 2008, 07:24 AM) [snapback]390353[/snapback]


That's not rain! biggrin.gif Is dark sarcasm still allowed?

And I bet you go to a conservative church every sunday to get that big ole sunny disposition.
2fat2ride
5/17/08
7:31 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 17 2008, 06:54 AM) [snapback]390347[/snapback]


This really is the story. This bunch in Harrisburg either are anti-traditional values or have them and are acting like they've had orchidectomies to try to appear to be sophisticated and modern, which makes them scoundrels. May we have the names please, of the ones who wanted to weaken the bill? It sounds like Harrisburg again needs more input from the people, i.e. the pay raise.




Actually, I think that the real story is how the false concept of "traditional values" has been placed into so many people's cognitive vocabulary. "Traditional values" is a propaganda motif. It is used by those who wish to simplify the complex cultural world into a nifty little "right and wrong" worldview. This is done to attract the endorsement of non-critical thinkers. Actually, I would go one step further and suggest that it is designed to turn people into non-critical thinkers.

Anyone who has even briefly studied values or culture in American history realizes quickly that there is very little "traditional" about them. Most people who are discussing "traditonal values" really just mean the values of their parents. And I am not about to carry on another generation of making all the same mistakes they did.

Culture and values always, always, always, always evolve. There's no getting around that. Politicians who make any claim about enacting legislation regarding "tradtional values" are fools. They are either non-critical thinkers with a limited understanding of the world and American history, or worse, Gil is correct and they are using "traditonal values" legislation as a tool to make all the sheeple go, "Baahhhhh."

bigstew
5/17/08
8:05 AM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 17 2008, 07:31 AM) [snapback]390357[/snapback]




Actually, I think that the real story is how the false concept of "traditional values" has been placed into so many people's cognitive vocabulary. "Traditional values" is a propaganda motif. It is used by those who wish to simplify the complex cultural world into a nifty little "right and wrong" worldview. This is done to attract the endorsement of non-critical thinkers. Actually, I would go one step further and suggest that it is designed to turn people into non-critical thinkers.

Anyone who has even briefly studied values or culture in American history realizes quickly that there is very little "traditional" about them. Most people who are discussing "traditonal values" really just mean the values of their parents. And I am not about to carry on another generation of making all the same mistakes they did.

Culture and values always, always, always, always evolve. There's no getting around that. Politicians who make any claim about enacting legislation regarding "tradtional values" are fools. They are either non-critical thinkers with a limited understanding of the world and American history, or worse, Gil is correct and they are using "traditonal values" legislation as a tool to make all the sheeple go, "Baahhhhh."

Or it could be that some people are comfortable with the world they grew up in. Why try to box everyone in to such a narrow view of the world?
Wonder
5/17/08
8:09 AM
Please keep reading beyond the first paragraph !!!

Thanks BigMac2 for being right about me. Although I believe there is no genetic proof of homosexuality and certainly do not see any proof of transgender issues [from years of study of the topic related to child studies and suicide prevention....yup...I know that there are a lot of suicide deaths relating to the issues of homosexuality], I do not mean any harm. Perhaps the emoticon was not a good choice. I believed the smile.gif was a bit more neutral than the dry.gif [suspicious did not fit], the blink.gif [goofy did not fit] or the rolleyes.gif [this one seemed sarcastic].

How is this one? huh.gif [Yes, this one looks confused...I edit to this one]. OR NONE would have probably been the best choice.

Okay. Here is the thing. In my studying, I have found that with DNA testing there is the result of either MALE or FEMALE but not both. This is the result even when both male and female organs are evident. While some will say that DNA testing would open up another kettle of worms, the consequences of adult promiscuity by the mother are of no concern to me compared to the confusion that surrounds sexual identity issues. The child should not suffer because the adult has something to hide. With DNA testing, that certain population who grow up confused, would not do so. The "feeling" that you have always been the opposite gender than the one you were named at birth, would not be an issue. My position on this issue is not one of malace. I am always on the side of the child. If treatment is begun at birth [ first by appropriate identification of gender], the first stage may be the shock experienced by parents but the adults will adjust. Then the appropriate treatments will result in the child being treated appropriately from the get-go. There will then be no need for traumatic treatment later in life to be what you were born to be.

I hope this clears up my position about some things. Thanks, BigMac2 for following though with your perceptions of me and allowing me this explaination of a sensitive issue. I was a quiet child. I listened and paid attention to the world as it appeared to me. As I got older I paid even more attention to the dispair that lead some people to feel the need to drink to access, take drugs to the point of destruction and otherwise to merely choose to end their life. I knew at a young age that it had to start out as a child. I saw many of the same patterns in children that I saw in adults even before I could verbalize or understand what I saw. If I had been born rich, I may have helped the world on a larger scale. I hope that my observations and studies have at least helped those with whom I came into contact in my chosen work over the years. ph34r.gif <--- this one seems safe.

dragonrider
5/17/08
8:17 AM
I kniew I could smell the deep thinking of big stew coming or was that his dirty diaper get them confused you know.

Wonder, there are an awful lot of transgendered people out their whose DNA XX or XY do not match their perceived gender. One explanation for this from studies I have seen is hormonal wash during gestation. A simple DNA test for XX or XY will not answer the issue at birth.
Wonder
5/17/08
8:47 AM
Think scientifically. I am not talking about hormonal wash...whatever that is...I am talking about DNA [programmed at the time of conception].

In my opinion there is no good reason for a person to become something they are not. That is carrying self-mutilation to the extreme. I am talking about DNA testing so that people can be or become what they ARE programmed to be. That may be true of you, in my way of thinking, Dragonrider, so please do not see offense.

I know of a situation where a person went through the whole transgender process. HE believed his family was adjusted but they were not. I happened to be in a position, or in several positions at the time, where I saw proof that the family was not adjusted. The "adjustment" was just another fantasy the subject needed to believe in his [to her] delusional self. Why not start the process in the beginning, so that innocent people do not have to suffer for the wants and desires of one person who could have been helped. The information was not available even 20 years ago but now it is out there so there is no excuse for the next generation. We need to deal with real issues and not legislate a continuance on the wrong path.

I realize there is confusion and turmoil in the homosexual community. We need to provide appropriate medical and psychological care so that real issues are dealt with....bullying of individuals from a young age on up, dysfunctional families, acohol/substance abuse and physical and sexual abuse of children. Then we can return to the time when there were fewer individuals who believed the only answer was the homosexual lifestyle. Life choices should not be so easy for anyone by the way. I am not just picking on those who choose the homosexual lifestyle.

Okay. You discounted what I said immediately, Dragonrider. I am done. It could be that someone knows something.

If no one listens, I move on.....

UNTIL THE NEXT TIME. wink.gif
dragonrider
5/17/08
8:59 AM
I am a tad confused not dismissive.



Are you saying that homosexuals need medical and psychological care to overcome bullying , alcohol/drug abuse, sexual abuse etc in order to become straight. Are you saying you know of some genetic test to identify gender identity beyond genetic test of xx and xy.



your post are a little confusing to me perhaps its my fault. As far as offense ussually I take no offense of peoples differing opinions I just take offense of people denying me my rights.

Bigmaclender2
5/17/08
10:02 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 17 2008, 08:47 AM) [snapback]390374[/snapback]
Think scientifically. I am not talking about hormonal wash...whatever that is...I am talking about DNA [programmed at the time of conception].

In my opinion there is no good reason for a person to become something they are not. That is carrying self-mutilation to the extreme. I am talking about DNA testing so that people can be or become what they ARE programmed to be. That may be true of you, in my way of thinking, Dragonrider, so please do not see offense.

I know of a situation where a person went through the whole transgender process. HE believed his family was adjusted but they were not. I happened to be in a position, or in several positions at the time, where I saw proof that the family was not adjusted. The "adjustment" was just another fantasy the subject needed to believe in his [to her] delusional self. Why not start the process in the beginning, so that innocent people do not have to suffer for the wants and desires of one person who could have been helped. The information was not available even 20 years ago but now it is out there so there is no excuse for the next generation. We need to deal with real issues and not legislate a continuance on the wrong path.

I realize there is confusion and turmoil in the homosexual community. We need to provide appropriate medical and psychological care so that real issues are dealt with....bullying of individuals from a young age on up, dysfunctional families, acohol/substance abuse and physical and sexual abuse of children. Then we can return to the time when there were fewer individuals who believed the only answer was the homosexual lifestyle. Life choices should not be so easy for anyone by the way. I am not just picking on those who choose the homosexual lifestyle.

Okay. You discounted what I said immediately, Dragonrider. I am done. It could be that someone knows something.

If no one listens, I move on.....

UNTIL THE NEXT TIME. wink.gif




I agree with what you are saying (in my case, anyways). Here's the situation though, Wonder. I was on the adoption block at birth. I was born at a private hospital with little funding especially for something of this nature. My biological mother was 14 when she had me. I was adopted into A VERY STRICT Catholic family (they still had mass in Latin) and said the rosary together as a family,etc. Where did that leave me at that point????



If I had DNA testing as an infant and they found predominant male instead of female and rectified the problem I would have been much happier so far and my new parents would have been much more loving and accepting of me. It sure is easier to live with yourself and others when you know exactly who you are. I'll give you that much. I'm here today by no choice of my own and I was born that way and you know it. I have two children-one is 27 years old and one is seven years old. I'm not about to put them through all of that. I, on the other hand, think of others besides myself and how I feel. You may not agree with homosexuality but all I'm asking is that you tolerate it. I don't push myself off on anyone outside of cyberspace-honestly. I know that you think you feel an obligation to your God to spread his word but I don't think that's what he meant. He did say that he is the one to judge others and not man. Let's say that I kill myself because I constantly got harrassed by you and I had nowhere to turn. What would that make you then? We should teach all of this world to love one another as I have loved you and let the final "scientific explanations" be left to God. This world would be a much nicer place if everyone just got along and focused on themselves and no one else. Would you at least agree with that?


Please understand that I mean nothing to harm you-I'm merely just giving hypothetical situations to help understand where it is that I am coming from. You know that I am okay with you and have no hard feelings. You also know that this is a VERY sensitive subject for me. Thanks for the posts.........


littledutchboy
5/17/08
11:02 AM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 17 2008, 10:02 AM) [snapback]390400[/snapback]




I agree with what you are saying (in my case, anyways). Here's the situation though, Wonder. I was on the adoption block at birth. I was born at a private hospital with little funding especially for something of this nature. My biological mother was 14 when she had me. I was adopted into A VERY STRICT Catholic family (they still had mass in Latin) and said the rosary together as a family,etc. Where did that leave me at that point????



If I had DNA testing as an infant and they found predominant male instead of female and rectified the problem I would have been much happier so far and my new parents would have been much more loving and accepting of me. It sure is easier to live with yourself and others when you know exactly who you are. I'll give you that much. I'm here today by no choice of my own and I was born that way and you know it. I have two children-one is 27 years old and one is seven years old. I'm not about to put them through all of that. I, on the other hand, think of others besides myself and how I feel. You may not agree with homosexuality but all I'm asking is that you tolerate it. I don't push myself off on anyone outside of cyberspace-honestly. I know that you think you feel an obligation to your God to spread his word but I don't think that's what he meant. He did say that he is the one to judge others and not man. Let's say that I kill myself because I constantly got harrassed by you and I had nowhere to turn. What would that make you then? We should teach all of this world to love one another as I have loved you and let the final "scientific explanations" be left to God. This world would be a much nicer place if everyone just got along and focused on themselves and no one else. Would you at least agree with that?


Please understand that I mean nothing to harm you-I'm merely just giving hypothetical situations to help understand where it is that I am coming from. You know that I am okay with you and have no hard feelings. You also know that this is a VERY sensitive subject for me. Thanks for the posts.........






Sorry but I think your posted comments, ( as I highlighted) speak to a psychological causation for your gender confusion and not genetic or hormonal. My guess is that you play the female, ( submissive ) role in your relationships as a way to receive the love, attention and acceptance you feel you missed as a child.



Predominantly male? Genetically there is no predominantly, you either are a male or you are not.



Did you catch the OW show a few weeks back? A woman changing her identity to a man with hormone therapy, now pregnant. That person made me sick, and the real shame is that there will be a child involved in that pycho sexual behavior. sad.gif







Bigmaclender2
5/17/08
1:04 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 17 2008, 11:02 AM) [snapback]390415[/snapback]




Sorry but I think your posted comments, ( as I highlighted) speak to a psychological causation for your gender confusion and not genetic or hormonal. My guess is that you play the female, ( submissive ) role in your relationships as a way to receive the love, attention and acceptance you feel you missed as a child.

[/size]

[size="3"]Predominantly male? Genetically there is no predominantly, you either are a male or you are not.

Did you catch the OW show a few weeks back? A woman changing her identity to a man with hormone therapy, now pregnant. That person made me sick, and the real shame is that there will be a child involved in that pycho sexual behavior. sad.gif




Once again, you are way off the mark. I know that you try your hardest but you aren't even in the same town as the ballpark let alone the same ballpark. I was supposed to be a man. All my friends are straight men. I don't have many gay friends. I identify as a female in body only. As for my tending to be like a female in my relationships to receive the love, attention and acceptance that I didn't receive as a child......well.........way off the mark, sorry. You are completely wrong. If you really need to know.......I have been with over at least 60 or 70 women (almost all of them have been straight or Bisexual) with the exception of 2. All straight women say there's just something about me that intriques them and they are totally attracted to me. They also tell me that no other man has ever made love to them as completely as I have................since you felt the need to know...........

dragonrider
5/17/08
2:56 PM
LDB your ignorance and hate speak volumes about you that no bible concordance ever could. And like you say about the man on OW your hate and ignorance make me want to visit the porcelein throne to worship the god of upchuck
SproutingUp
5/17/08
3:17 PM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 02:39 AM) [snapback]389318[/snapback]


Oh, and by the by, if you don't want someone to think you're quoting them, don't use their wording. laugh.gif




All the homophobes use the exact same wording, so it's impossible to not use the wording they used. It's a script.



QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 15 2008, 08:22 AM) [snapback]389357[/snapback]


I am sorry you have had bad experiences with churches in your past. The experiences you listed are sad examples of how not to show love for another person.

However, assuming that all Christians are like that just because some Christians were unkind to you is stereotyping. Say a person visits the ocean for the first time, having never actually seen the ocean, but having been told that there are white sandy beaches on the ocean, and the place they visit happens to be lined with rocks instead of sand. They could assume that what they have been told is a lie, or they could keep looking for another beach.


Then perhaps you should extend an invitation to dragonrider to visit your church with you to show that your church isn't a group of hatred.

That would prove the point easily. Then dragonrider would know if you are telling the truth or just covering it up. Maybe you would pick up a new member if it was loving and inviting like you say it is.



QUOTE(dee @ May 15 2008, 08:59 AM) [snapback]389372[/snapback]


Would you like to share your viewpoint on the issue and discuss it or would you just like to jump in on our discussion and make disparaging marks against me?





You know darn well that stew would much rather jump in and make disparaging remarks!! laugh.gif cool.gif

dragonrider
5/17/08
3:17 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 17 2008, 03:16 PM) [snapback]390470[/snapback]




All the homophobes use the exact same wording, so it's impossible to not use the wording they used. It's a script. LOL you really cracked me up.





Then perhaps you should extend an invitation to dragonrider to visit your church with you to show that your church isn't a group of hatred.

That would prove the point easily. Then dragonrider would know if you are telling the truth or just covering it up. Maybe you would pick up a new member if it was loving and inviting like you say it is.

SproutingUp
5/17/08
3:19 PM
QUOTE(johnq @ May 15 2008, 08:31 AM) [snapback]389359[/snapback]
I had a homosexual cousin who died of AIDS in 1990. He was also a strict practicing Catholic. When he became too ill to attend Mass, one of the priests and several members of his Congregation came to his house and performed Mass there. That is an example of the kind of love that exists in some churches.




That's wonderful that he had a supportive church. Now, would your church do it? Would you, personally do it? Would you accept him into your church if you knew he was gay (and let's say celibate and devout to staying celibate) beforehand?

dragonrider
5/17/08
3:22 PM
Which is why I never show Stew any respect anymore, nor LDB

You know when I really could have used the support of the christian church where were they helping me or slamming the door in my face. Slamming the door in my face.

SproutingUp
5/17/08
3:38 PM
[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288'] Typical liberal talking point...If you disagree with someone, you must hate them.

Sheesh...My wife told me tonight that she doesn't want a dog, but I want a dog...we disagree...that must mean we hate each other. [/quote]



No, it means your wife doesn't like/want dogs. The hatred is conferred to what it is you're arguing ABOUT


[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']
I have had several friends over the years who chose to live a homosexual lifestyle. Note the word "friends" in that sentence...obviously, I must hate them if they are my friends. They knew I disagreed with their lifestyle, but we never made it an issue. We've lost touch over time, but I know if we were to meet again, it would still be as friends. [/quote]

Friends....that fell out of touch...


[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']
Do I think homosexuals should be allowed to marry? Let me ask a different question, why would they need to? I have asked that question before and never recieved a compelling answer. [/quote]

Because there are over a thousand legal privaledges given to married couples that are not given to unmarried couples. They deserve to get the same rights as any other couple does. Being of the same gender is a civil discrimination keeping them from doing so.

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

[quote]
You mean like making laws that say certain people can't be married like they did against blacks/whites not too many years ago that was overturned?



[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']
Do I think God recognizes the union of a homosexual couple whether they claim to be married or not? Well, that's His business, not mine. [/quote]

My CHRISTIAN church says he does.




[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']

I believe homosexuality is a sin; [/quote]

I disagree and believe it isn't.



[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']


however, I also believe murder, rape, incest, lust, gluttony, gossip, slander, etc. are sins. No one sin is any worse in God's eyes than another. Jesus Himself said "it is not the healthy who need a physician, but the sick." Funny...seems to me that he was falsely accused too...Seems to me He also said that the greatest commandment is to "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, and the second is like unto it, Love your neighbor as yourself."[/quote]

that would include your homosexual neighbors.

There are sins you didn't list that are practiced in this country every day. Is that because you don't see them as sins or because it would name you a sinner?



[quote name='Rural Conservative' date='May 15 2008, 12:40 AM' post='389288']

So Gil (and any of you others out there who want to try to twist everything into an emotional argument by calling someone a hatemonger when they disagree with you), they are certainly some people out there who are deluded in their thinking, who do hate others based upon their choices in life. They are not indicative of the bulk of Conservative Christians. Most of us do our best to reach out to anyone struggling with sin of any kind, through the love of Christ, not through any idea that we are better than they.

Your tactics are very tiresome and more than a little childish.
[/quote]



Again, I disagree.



QUOTE(Scout @ May 15 2008, 02:02 PM) [snapback]389594[/snapback]


Lemme guess, you have one of the t-shirts that says on the back "If you can read this, the b*tch fell off"? laugh.gif





I'm still not gettin rid of my shirt!!



QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 15 2008, 02:17 PM) [snapback]389604[/snapback]
LDB, I have seen many reasoned discussions here from the left to which you reply with some non sequetir or hate. So I think the same can be said of the right.



Rural I have found a church but you can be sure it is not a conservative church nor do I include and conservative christians among my friends, You see the problem arises thus, A conservative christian says my "lifestyle" is a "choice". That this choice can and should be legislated against just like polygamy, beastiality or pedophilia.

Now first and foremost I see Homosexuality and transgenderism as something I was born with . I never chose nor did any of my gay friends chose to be gay or transgendered. They just are gay , just as you are straight. you never chose to be straight. Now when I am told that conservative christians want to legislate against homosexuality and I know I have no choice but to be what I am I hear them saying they want to legislate me out of existance to in effect end my life. Secondly when I am repeatedly compared to polygamists and pedophiles , I feel greatly insulted. So I respond with rightous indignation becuase I feel threatened and insulted. This is not hate this is rightous indignation for my life being denigrated and my rights being legislated away.

When I came out I was shot at, someone tried to run me over with a car, My tires were slashed, nails place under my tires, hate messages put on my car and workplace. I have a real reason to feel physically threatened by the response from the christian conservative Transgendered people have the highest percentage of hate crimes against them of any minority and most acts of violence are massive overkill where the victim is repeatedly stabbed and beaten.





To speak to dragonrider's position. Even in some gay communities, there is still hatred toward the transgendered by many members. They have the added stigma of not only being homosexual, but being in a body that is of a different gender than what they were meant to be. They do have many difficulties that go even beyond being gay and suffer even more than the general gay population does. I imagine dragonrider's life has been filled with hatred from people from every direction, nothing could be harder than having the entire world against you when you are doing nothing that harms another living soul.

It took me a while to undertand it, and befriending several transgendered people in order to do so. I "didn't get it" but it wasn't because of them, it was because I wasn't letting myself "get it". I had to reach out and listen to them and understand what they were saying before I "got it". Now I'm able to count various transgendered people as very good friends of mine because I took the time to listen to and understand what they were telling me.



QUOTE(dc @ May 15 2008, 02:18 PM) [snapback]389605[/snapback]
My point is very simple. There are many marriages out there that are doing great. Too often I see the picture painted that marriages are in trouble, or need fixed. It is a blanket statement that is not accurate, in my opinion.........




How about the gay marriages that are "doing great"? Do they not deserve the same as you do?



QUOTE(Wonder @ May 16 2008, 02:10 AM) [snapback]389854[/snapback]
How can you be BORN transgendered? smile.gif





A boy born in a girls body or the other way around. It happens because of the level of certain hormones in the womb during pregnancy. Google it, read it, then google it some more and you may understand.

Bigby_M
5/17/08
3:53 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 17 2008, 01:04 PM) [snapback]390437[/snapback]




They also tell me that no other man has ever made love to them as completely as I have................since you felt the need to know...........



Are you interesting in a tutoring job? laugh.gif

SproutingUp
5/17/08
4:03 PM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 17 2008, 08:05 AM) [snapback]390360[/snapback]
Or it could be that some people are comfortable with the world they grew up in. Why try to box everyone in to such a narrow view of the world?




The world you grew up in is gone. Most of us learned that when we became adults, went to college, perhaps living in a different town or state when we got our first career opportunity that went with our degree and then came back home to "visit". It was crystal clear that the world we grew up in was in the past and the future, even the present is now the world our children or grandchildren are growing up in. It would be foolish and malicious to want things to never change. Time marches on, and will continue to do so. The worst casualty is those who refuse to move forward with it.

I guess this is the biggest thing for "conservative christians". They want to keep Mayberry. Mayberry is gone, but it doesn't mean that the same peace, frienliness and satisfaction can't be found outside of Mayberry. Andy Taylor retired long ago, Opie grew up and became Richie, then became Ron Howard, the director. Life is not a snapshot to be preserved for ever more, it is an ongoing process that will change not only from year to year but from moment to moment. We either change with it, or we become overpowered by nostalgia, unable to go any further until we end up in the cemetary and the rest of the world still keeps right on moving.

How can we help you to understand? How can we help you to move forward? How can we ease the fear you hold deep inside? We're not taking your "Mayberry" away, your Mayberry is already gone. How can we help you to accept your "Lancaster" or whatever city/area you live in as it exists in the present?

SproutingUp
5/17/08
4:15 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 17 2008, 11:02 AM) [snapback]390415[/snapback]




Sorry but I think your posted comments, ( as I highlighted) speak to a psychological causation for your gender confusion and not genetic or hormonal. My guess is that you play the female, ( submissive ) role in your relationships as a way to receive the love, attention and acceptance you feel you missed as a child.





Very few women today are "submissive". That's just another of your problems.

Guess what!! There's more than one sexual position!! Really!!!

Some even involve the woman being on top!! Can you imagine that!!! OMG, burn the witches!!!



QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 17 2008, 11:02 AM) [snapback]390415[/snapback]


Predominantly male? Genetically there is no predominantly, you either are a male or you are not.





Apparently you are unaware of the XXY or the XYY conditions that are documented to exist. Google "super male" or "super female" and look at the articles that are scientificly based, not the comic books.

dragonrider
5/17/08
4:18 PM
I don't know who you are sproutville but I think I am in love. tongue.gif
SproutingUp
5/17/08
4:21 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 17 2008, 01:04 PM) [snapback]390437[/snapback]




Once again, you are way off the mark. I know that you try your hardest but you aren't even in the same town as the ballpark let alone the same ballpark. I was supposed to be a man. All my friends are straight men. I don't have many gay friends. I identify as a female in body only. As for my tending to be like a female in my relationships to receive the love, attention and acceptance that I didn't receive as a child......well.........way off the mark, sorry. You are completely wrong. If you really need to know.......I have been with over at least 60 or 70 women (almost all of them have been straight or Bisexual) with the exception of 2. All straight women say there's just something about me that intriques them and they are totally attracted to me. They also tell me that no other man has ever made love to them as completely as I have................since you felt the need to know...........





Growing up, I was always mistaken for a boy. When I played little league basketball, they kept trying to send me to the boys locker room LOL

I still get called "Mister" or "Sir" from time to time. For a long time, when I was a child, and had feelings for girls instead of boys, I wanted God to make them go away or miraculously turn me into a boy so I'd be "normal". I didn't realize I was already normal. Now I embrace the fact that I am female and that I'm a lesbian. I have no issues with this because now I understand what I didn't understand as a child. The problem is, those who are so adamant against homosexuality, don't understand yet and they won't understand as long as they refuse to attempt understanding.



QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 17 2008, 04:18 PM) [snapback]390483[/snapback]
I don't know who you are sproutville but I think I am in love. tongue.gif




LOL, you met me at the movie "The bible tells me so" with my wife Scout.

Rural Conservative
5/17/08
7:14 PM
[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']



No, it means your wife doesn't like/want dogs. The hatred is conferred to what it is you're arguing ABOUT

[quote]



You don't do sarcasm much I take it?



[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']

Friends....that fell out of touch...

[quote]



As I have fallen out of touch with most of the people I've met over the years. I generally have one or two close friends whom I keep track of. Usually, unless someone tries to maintain a friendship with me, we eventually lose touch. I guess that must never have happened to you. You must still be in close contact with everyone you have ever befriended.


[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']


Because there are over a thousand legal privaledges given to married couples that are not given to unmarried couples. They deserve to get the same rights as any other couple does. Being of the same gender is a civil discrimination keeping them from doing so.


[quote]



Ok...Which privileges...Name a few...



[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']

Do I think the government should get involved in the matter? I really don't think so. In my oppinion, marriage should be the perview of whatever religion the persons in question belong to. The Government has their hands in peoples' business as it is.

"You mean like making laws that say certain people can't be married like they did against blacks/whites not too many years ago that was overturned?"


[quote] That would be one. Another would be restricting my rights to own firearms, or the right for my child to pray in school if he wishes to (which right he actually has, but many teachers and schools tell children that they can't pray even though that's not what the law says, but anyway, that's an entirely different topic).



[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']


My CHRISTIAN church says he does.



[quote]



Well, then, that is your church's view, and that again is the perview of your Church, not the government. I kinda wrote that in a prior paragraph.



[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']

I disagree and believe it isn't.


[quote]



I kinda figured out that you disagree. Again, you have a right to disagree, does that mean you hate me? I hope not...It would be kind of silly to hate me just because we disagree.



[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']

that would include your homosexual neighbors.



[quote]



Did you actually read what I wrote with a will to understand? That was kinda implied.



[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']

There are sins you didn't list that are practiced in this country every day. Is that because you don't see them as sins or because it would name you a sinner?

[quote]



There's a little abbreviation in that list "etc.". It means, "and so on - and so forth." Watch "The King and I"...the Yul Brenner loved that word. This leads me to think, once again, that you weren't really reading what I wrote, but rather, picking out what you disagreed with in order to pick a fight.

[quote name='SproutingUp' date='May 17 2008, 03:38 PM' post='390477']

Again, I disagree.

[quote]



OK, so we disagree. End of story. You know my side, I know your side. Now we can be friends...unless you hate me because I'm straight...but then...that would be silly...wouldn't it?


Wonder
5/17/08
7:21 PM
dragonrider asked me:
QUOTE
Are you saying that homosexuals need medical and psychological care to overcome bullying , alcohol/drug abuse, sexual abuse etc in order to become straight. Are you saying you know of some genetic test to identify gender identity beyond genetic test of xx and xy.
I say: NO, NO, NO. I am saying that there needs to be DNA testing to determine the actual sex of each baby [you are either MALE OR FEMALE shortly after conception takes place, not part one or the other or both...even though certain other organs may be present or partially present... YOU are conceived as ONLY MALE or FEMALE. The presence of other organs may confuse but DNA tests do not lie ].

I was saying that everyone needs psychological care who needs it. I am saying that every child needs education and treatment in overcoming bullying, aspects of alcohol/drug or sexual abuse [in their environment], in order to be whatever they were born to be. We have to educate every child because we do not always know which children are being bullied, from household environments where alcohol/drug abuse or physical or sexual abuse is happening. Up until a few years ago, schools had very specific curriculae on these topics but as money gets tighter those aspects of education are seen as "frills" instead of the necessities they really are.

My research and learning tells me that there are environmental factors [nurture], which lead children to make the decision toward the homosexual lifestyle. The things that can be controlled include making all children resistive to bullying and the types of reactive behaviors associated with early life trauma.



BigMac2 I believe [now that you said it on here], that you believe you could be a DNA male who was not identified as such. I believe you are saying that your life is such that now you feel it is too late [and you are unwilling], to go back and change, because it would impact too many others in your life. You are acting out of concern and sensitivity for everyone else in your life and see no need to "rock the boat" because you are comfortable with your life as it is. You are not defensive about homosexuality and have your own views. All that I can say is that you seem very conciencious and rational. The religion aspect has to be between you and God, because none of us is allowed to prounounce judgement. That happens on Judgement Day. In your case, I am very happy that we are not allowed to judge. I can go so far as to say that I understand your thinking from your viewpoint. Your particular profile [as given by you], supports my premise of "not being born homosexual". We are not talking about promiscuity so I am almost ignoring the "60 to 70 females you made love to".











wife = the partner of a man in a marriage.





Nativeson
5/18/08
12:18 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 17 2008, 07:29 AM) [snapback]390356[/snapback]
And I bet you go to a conservative church every sunday to get that big ole sunny disposition.


I'll bet you go to the shrink to get that venemous disposition. Or is Talkback enough to get you there? It seems my "big ole sunny disposition" offends you. I didn't comment on your story because it frankly your castration and losing your breast implant was more than I needed to know about you. Here's the thing: I post my thoughts on the policies and behavior of the professional politicians and the sources of our friend the columnist and you somehow project hatred of yourself from me. If this is what you do on an online discussion forum it causes me to ask the question: Is this a dynamic in your relationships with others?

I read your heart-wrenching story as in part A, the things you couldn't control as an innocent child and part B, the things you choose to do as an adult. The question in my mind is, why couldn't you grow up and with society's help put the animal who abused you behind bars where he should be and go on with your life? I'm not suggesting that it would've been easy but that Biblical justice, forgiveness and acceptance will lead us to healing, fullfillment and meaning in life like nothing else can. Please have yourself the best of weekends!



dragonrider
5/18/08
12:40 AM
hey Nativeson you are big on choice, exercise your choice and don't read my posts. simple I was using someones else statement that most conservative christians reach out with love and using you as an example of the opposite. Your response was to say that you were Plssing on me. My story of my youth was in response to a question of how one becomes transgendered from my own perspective.
dragonrider
5/18/08
1:14 AM
You post your thoughts, here I didn't know you had any thoughts
SproutingUp
5/18/08
6:51 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 17 2008, 07:21 PM) [snapback]390507[/snapback]

My research and learning tells me that there are environmental factors [nurture], which lead children to make the decision toward the homosexual lifestyle.


We've seen your so-called "research" and you have shown no learning to us whatsoever.

There's no decision to be made, it isn't a choice. They are born that way.





QUOTE(Wonder @ May 17 2008, 07:21 PM) [snapback]390507[/snapback]


wife = the partner of a man in a marriage.




wife= the female partner in a marriage

In my marriage, we're both wives.

Don't really care if you like it or not, but you don't have the right to define it for the world. Whether you like it or don't like it, she's my wife. Nothing you can say or do will ever change that.

















DNA tests cannot predict a fetus' gender until the 5th-6th week of pregnancy. Does gender exist before that. Why can DNA tests not determine it?

Wonder
5/18/08
8:13 AM
QUOTE
wife= the female partner in a marriage
In my marriage, we're both wives.
Don't really care if you like it or not, but you don't have the right to define it for the world. Whether you like it or don't like it, she's my wife. Nothing you can say or do will ever change that.
DNA tests cannot predict a fetus' gender until the 5th-6th week of pregnancy. Does gender exist before that. Why can DNA tests not determine it?

1./ Based upon what I see in your writing, I would suggest that my research is thorough and sound and I cannot see proof of the same in your writing. I do not write nasty comments thinking I refute anything you say. That is only done out of defensiveness. I see that in your posts.
2./ You are not married to each other, therefore, neither one of you is a wife.
3./ Why would anyone want to do a DNA test for gender at that stage, anyway? That sounds scarey as though someone would want to make decisions about keeping a child based upon sex. The developing fetus has very important things to do. Everything is in order, but all systems develop in a planned order.

* 8 weeks - all body systems present. The heart only began to beat on day 18. I would suggest the developing embryo was developing heart and circulatory system muscles up until that time as a priority.

* 16 weeks - genital organs clearly differentiated, grasps with hands, swims, kicks, turns, somersaults, (still not felt by the mother.) This says genetal organs are differentiated but the body systems were present at 8 weeks. So I can see that with your "hormonal body wash" information that the developing organs may be infleuenced by plecental or uterine hormones, but that the sex of male or female was set before that. The DNA testing is necessary after birth to determine the sex of the child, not visual perusal of sexual organs.
Makita
5/18/08
10:37 AM
Wonder,



What you are stating is totally physical. You feel that what a persons body looks like on the outside should determine what they are. Everything I hear from the gays is how they feel mentally, emotionally and how their hormones dictate what they are. These are not things we can see on the outside. Only they can feel what is on the inside. Which is more important how someone looks or how they feel?

Bigmaclender2
5/18/08
10:46 AM
QUOTE(Bigby_M @ May 17 2008, 03:53 PM) [snapback]390478[/snapback]


Are you interesting in a tutoring job? laugh.gif





I've had men pay me to teach them some things.........

Makita
5/18/08
10:52 AM
Big M

Pretty funny and I'm sure a lot of woman would appreciate you teaching their men. Heaven knows they could use it!!!! Uh if my husband is reading this - just kidding.

Bigmaclender2
5/18/08
10:56 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 17 2008, 07:21 PM) [snapback]390507[/snapback]
dragonrider asked me: I say: NO, NO, NO. I am saying that there needs to be DNA testing to determine the actual sex of each baby [you are either MALE OR FEMALE shortly after conception takes place, not part one or the other or both...even though certain other organs may be present or partially present... YOU are conceived as ONLY MALE or FEMALE. The presence of other organs may confuse but DNA tests do not lie ].

I was saying that everyone needs psychological care who needs it. I am saying that every child needs education and treatment in overcoming bullying, aspects of alcohol/drug or sexual abuse [in their environment], in order to be whatever they were born to be. We have to educate every child because we do not always know which children are being bullied, from household environments where alcohol/drug abuse or physical or sexual abuse is happening. Up until a few years ago, schools had very specific curriculae on these topics but as money gets tighter those aspects of education are seen as "frills" instead of the necessities they really are.

My research and learning tells me that there are environmental factors [nurture], which lead children to make the decision toward the homosexual lifestyle. The things that can be controlled include making all children resistive to bullying and the types of reactive behaviors associated with early life trauma.



BigMac2 I believe [now that you said it on here], that you believe you could be a DNA male who was not identified as such. I believe you are saying that your life is such that now you feel it is too late [and you are unwilling], to go back and change, because it would impact too many others in your life. You are acting out of concern and sensitivity for everyone else in your life and see no need to "rock the boat" because you are comfortable with your life as it is. You are not defensive about homosexuality and have your own views. All that I can say is that you seem very conciencious and rational. The religion aspect has to be between you and God, because none of us is allowed to prounounce judgement. That happens on Judgement Day. In your case, I am very happy that we are not allowed to judge. I can go so far as to say that I understand your thinking from your viewpoint. Your particular profile [as given by you], supports my premise of "not being born homosexual". We are not talking about promiscuity so I am almost ignoring the "60 to 70 females you made love to".
wife = the partner of a man in a marriage.




They need to come up with another DNA test for hormone/testosterone balance in the bloodstream. I was beyond a shadow of a doubt born a female physically with no other partial parts or anything of that nature.



QUOTE(Makita @ May 18 2008, 10:52 AM) [snapback]390668[/snapback]
Big M

Pretty funny and I'm sure a lot of woman would appreciate you teaching their men. Heaven knows they could use it!!!! Uh if my husband is reading this - just kidding.





I'm not saying that I'm proud of it but I have actually had a few of them thank me for allowing them to "find themselves" again........

dragonrider
5/18/08
11:14 AM
We know that physically genitals can vary from fully female or fully male to everything in between regardless of genetic dna. Why would we presume a brain which is much more complex would be any different.
Makita
5/18/08
11:24 AM
I follow the philosophy of Ayn Rand in Atlas Shrugged, "The only power people have over us is the power we give them." Over the years it has been a great help. Any other books you can recommend?
littledutchboy
5/18/08
11:41 AM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 17 2008, 07:31 AM) [snapback]390357[/snapback]




Actually, I think that the real story is how the false concept of "traditional values" has been placed into so many people's cognitive vocabulary. "Traditional values" is a propaganda motif. It is used by those who wish to simplify the complex cultural world into a nifty little "right and wrong" worldview. This is done to attract the endorsement of non-critical thinkers. Actually, I would go one step further and suggest that it is designed to turn people into non-critical thinkers.

Anyone who has even briefly studied values or culture in American history realizes quickly that there is very little "traditional" about them. Most people who are discussing "traditonal values" really just mean the values of their parents. And I am not about to carry on another generation of making all the same mistakes they did.

Culture and values always, always, always, always evolve. There's no getting around that. Politicians who make any claim about enacting legislation regarding "tradtional values" are fools. They are either non-critical thinkers with a limited understanding of the world and American history, or worse, Gil is correct and they are using "traditonal values" legislation as a tool to make all the sheeple go, "Baahhhhh."





Ya we’re evolving all right, lets review some of those changes; more and more young people with behavioral problems and psychological issues, increasing incarceration rates,

lack of respect for private property, violence, anti social behavior. Children need to be chaperoned at bus stops, homes must be lock, security devises on retail items. All this a curing during a time of unprecedented prosperity.



Yep we sure have evolved, from community based concepts of acceptable behavior to the individual rules. Gay marriage is all about,you you you its all about what you want and not about what is best for our community.



The recognition of gay couples for any reason is de-evolution.



Pa needs to pass the amendment and put an end to this gay marriage silliness.













Makita
5/18/08
11:58 AM
Little D



Are you blaming the gays on all the problems with our youth? They are not the problem. Our problem is a few parents not taking responsibilty for their children. That is where the problem lies. Passing blame on the gays is just a way of you trying to twist facts to get your agenda across. Sorry won't work.

dragonrider
5/18/08
12:46 PM
And the reason Europe which has approved civil unions and is almost entirely seculer does not have these problems? Come LDB use your noggin and if religion is the only answer you can come up with perhaps you are asking the wrong question.
Wonder
5/18/08
2:00 PM
QUOTE
Wonder,
What you are stating is totally physical. You feel that what a persons body looks like on the outside should determine what they are. Everything I hear from the gays is how they feel mentally, emotionally and how their hormones dictate what they are. These are not things we can see on the outside. Only they can feel what is on the inside. Which is more important how someone looks or how they feel?
Sorry, but if you are talking emotionally and so on then we get into the nurture part. Since you refuse to believe homosexuality is not curable with therapy, you have set up an impossible conundrum for yourself.

BigMac2. DNA testing at birth would give an indication of male or female, period. I cannot help anyone to understand it, if they will not study the whole pre-natal process from conception to birth. The rest is nurture/environment/psychological/training, etc.. The type of hormonal condition you report has to do with environment, not genetics.

QUOTE
Pa needs to pass the amendment and put an end to this gay marriage silliness.
I agree.
dragonrider
5/18/08
2:07 PM
Wonder what are the psychological nurturing conditions that lead sheep to choose to become gay. Do we have reparative therapy for gay sheep.

2fat2ride
5/18/08
2:25 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 18 2008, 02:00 PM) [snapback]390702[/snapback]
Sorry, but if you are talking emotionally and so on then we get into the nurture part. Since you refuse to believe homosexuality is not curable with therapy, you have set up an impossible conundrum for yourself.

BigMac2. DNA testing at birth would give an indication of male or female, period. I cannot help anyone to understand it, if they will not study the whole pre-natal process from conception to birth. The rest is nurture/environment/psychological/training, etc.. The type of hormonal condition you report has to do with environment, not genetics.




So, then, why has the APA removed homosexuality from their list of disorders?

http://www.apa.org/topics/orientation.html



Are they just a bunch of silly pseudopscientists? Really, you would have thought they would have kept that on their list...probably some good money in curing the gays. Have you examined the issue more closely than they have? Perhaps you should ring them up, tell them about your research. Wouldn't want all those sick people with the gay disease running around.

Or perhaps they own a different translation of the Bible...is yours the second edition, or the third?



dragonrider
5/18/08
2:33 PM
Haven't you heard all scientists are evil atheists in league with Hitlers Nazis?
2fat2ride
5/18/08
2:38 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 18 2008, 11:41 AM) [snapback]390679[/snapback]

Yep we sure have evolved, from community based concepts of acceptable behavior to the individual rules. Gay marriage is all about,you you you its all about what you want and not about what is best for our community.




Nope, not about me at all. I'm not gay. It's about my uncle and his husband. My two neighbors, the two guys who own the nice house on the edge of town, the girl that I sat next next to in homeroom in high school who I heard got married somewhere in the Carribean last year to another girl from my high school, it's about my good friend (who everyone knows is gay, but still hasn't come out), it's about some of my students (some of whom are open, while others are not), it's about the two ladies I passed yesterday in the grocery store (ya don't need gay-dar to spot some of them), it's about this one dude I know who I ride bikes with (everyone knows he's gay and living with a partner, but he never brings the partner along), it's about the more than a thousand kids I went to college with who were open about their orientation...etc, etc.



Ya' see...it really is about community...only difference is, MY community accepts everyone on equal terms and wishes to see them all enjoy equal rights and acceptance in this world...your community must be a little different. You are more than welcome to join my community. Doesn't cost a cent.

2fat2ride
5/18/08
2:57 PM
QUOTE(littledutchboy @ May 18 2008, 11:41 AM) [snapback]390679[/snapback]

Ya we're evolving all right, lets review some of those changes; more and more young people with behavioral problems and psychological issues, increasing incarceration rates, lack of respect for private property, violence, anti social behavior. Children need to be chaperoned at bus stops, homes must be lock, security devises on retail items. All this a curing during a time of unprecedented prosperity.




Well, there are several problems with your mode of thought and rationality.

First, if indeed our culture is going to heck, it is a result of the culture before ours. So why make the same mistake twice, or three times? A hallmark of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and over while expecting different outcomes. If the way we are today is based upon past actions, than why mkae it spiral further downward?

Second, most of your perceptions are based on limited observation and are highly presentist and media-driven. Behavioral problems, psychological issues, etc. have the appearance of increasing because we simply recognize them more than we ever have in the past, not because they occur with greater frequency. It is also largely presentist. Go to the public library or the historical society and pick out some microfilmed newspapers...grab an issue from when you thought the world was perfect, and read it...you will find murder, rape, incest, violence, thieves, etc. as well as a whole host of problems that we no longer have like smallpox and lynchings.

Third, all these problems are occurring at a time of unprecedented prosperity? What a load of crap. Prosperity for whom? We aren't all prospering at the same rate...and most of the very real problems that you have identified are a direct result of this...not because the gays want to get hitched

tugrad
5/18/08
3:36 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 02:07 PM) [snapback]390703[/snapback]

Wonder what are the psychological nurturing conditions that lead sheep to choose to become gay. Do we have reparative therapy for gay sheep.

And the penguins in Central Park
Rural Conservative
5/18/08
3:55 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 02:07 PM) [snapback]390703[/snapback]
Wonder what are the psychological nurturing conditions that lead sheep to choose to become gay. Do we have reparative therapy for gay sheep.





Just a friendly suggestion...I don't think, if I were in your shoes that I would want to use what is often considered to be one of the world's stupidest animals as an argument for your position. Not trying to be smart or anything, just saying it's a weak argument.

Rural Conservative
5/18/08
4:06 PM
I didn't see this post until last night, and at that point, my head was hurting so badly I didn't have the energy to respond, but now I'm better, so here goes.



QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 17 2008, 03:17 PM) [snapback]390470[/snapback]




All the homophobes use the exact same wording, so it's impossible to not use the wording they used. It's a script.

Then perhaps you should extend an invitation to dragonrider to visit your church with you to show that your church isn't a group of hatred.

That would prove the point easily. Then dragonrider would know if you are telling the truth or just covering it up. Maybe you would pick up a new member if it was loving and inviting like you say it is.





Firstly, namecalling is childish and will get you nowhere.



Secondly, I do not give out personal information over the internet (tons of reasons, most of which are logical, none of which I will go into because I know I'm likely to just be accused of evading anyway, so there isn't any point). Were she someone I knew in real life, she would probably already have been invited (I've invited homosexual friends to church, I know, shocking).

dragonrider
5/18/08
4:07 PM
See here we go again, someone provides a perspective you can't answer so the rights response is a flipant nonsequitor.
Rural Conservative
5/18/08
4:08 PM
QUOTE(tugrad @ May 18 2008, 03:36 PM) [snapback]390720[/snapback]

And the penguins in Central Park




An animal outside its natural habitat acting differently than they do in the wild? How terribly surprising.

dragonrider
5/18/08
4:13 PM
Do you ever feel like one of those horses drawing a cart with the blinders on the side of your head. Cause thats the way you come off
Makita
5/18/08
4:22 PM
[quote name='2fat2ride' post='390711' date='May 18 2008, 02:38 PM']




Ya' see...it really is about community...only difference is, MY community accepts everyone on equal terms and wishes to see them all enjoy equal rights and acceptance in this world...your community must be a little different. You are more than welcome to join my community. Doesn't cost a cent.





2fat2ride



More detail.

Rural Conservative
5/18/08
4:50 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 04:13 PM) [snapback]390731[/snapback]
Do you ever feel like one of those horses drawing a cart with the blinders on the side of your head. Cause thats the way you come off




And here we go with the namecalling/insults again.



As for the sheep thing. Domestic sheep are stupid animals. They will also fall off a cliff if they are not watched, or wander too far into moving water to be swept away by the current, or eat a tuft of grass so far down that they are eventually eating dirt. They are not the best example that you could have used. There was no flippancy to my remark.



It intrigues me that when your arguments are met, rather than rationally responding, you start in with namecalling and angry attacks. It seems to me that while I have come to this forum with only the best of intentions and no hatred in my heart, I am met with only hatred and fierce vitriol by those who falsely accuse me of hatred and bigotry. If you really look at it, the bulk of the hatred appears to be coming from the other side here, not from me.



I've said what I am going to say in this thread. I see no reason to discuss anything futher as it is obvious that no one here is interested in reasonable discussion.



Makita
5/18/08
5:00 PM
Rural,



Don't stop. If you are open minded and care about others your opinion is welcome. I also am rural. Sometimes tempers prevail. Something else I'm working on.

dragonrider
5/18/08
5:09 PM
Can you cite your source that homosexuality in sheep is the result of stupidity?



Do you know the difference between an analogy and an insult.

tugrad
5/18/08
6:14 PM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 18 2008, 02:57 PM) [snapback]390714[/snapback]

Well, there are several problems with your mode of thought and rationality.

First, if indeed our culture is going to heck, it is a result of the culture before ours. So why make the same mistake twice, or three times? A hallmark of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and over while expecting different outcomes. If the way we are today is based upon past actions, than why mkae it spiral further downward?

Second, most of your perceptions are based on limited observation and are highly presentist and media-driven. Behavioral problems, psychological issues, etc. have the appearance of increasing because we simply recognize them more than we ever have in the past, not because they occur with greater frequency. It is also largely presentist. Go to the public library or the historical society and pick out some microfilmed newspapers...grab an issue from when you thought the world was perfect, and read it...you will find murder, rape, incest, violence, thieves, etc. as well as a whole host of problems that we no longer have like smallpox and lynchings.

Third, all these problems are occurring at a time of unprecedented prosperity? What a load of crap. Prosperity for whom? We aren't all prospering at the same rate...and most of the very real problems that you have identified are a direct result of this...not because the gays want to get hitched

Excellent post.
SproutingUp
5/18/08
6:38 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 18 2008, 08:13 AM) [snapback]390635[/snapback]

1./ Based upon what I see in your writing, I would suggest that my research is thorough and sound and I cannot see proof of the same in your writing. I do not write nasty comments thinking I refute anything you say. That is only done out of defensiveness. I see that in your posts.


Since you aren't an authority on...well, anything, you are in no place to judge anything from my writing and I suggest your "research" is nothing more than a google search that desparately looks for something to agree with your distorted logic. Your lack of seeing does not signify a lack of existance. It just means you are either a) blinded by your hatred or b.) incapable of comprehension.

You write nasty comments about everything and everyone. You are correct that what you write is done in defensiveness. It's kind of funny how you fancy yourself a "scholar" and even someone who is capable of research, let alone someone who has produced any. I see in your writing, a closet homosexual who is trying to rationalize your feelings by demeaning others and trying to make it go away in a psychological sense. I see in your writing, a deep depression that has developed over a long period of time that has disabled you in being able to communicate with people in a logical and sensible manner. I see in your writing a desparate need for acceptance and an attempt at making yourself seem to be more than you are because of an inferiority complex. I have the same authority you have in the judging of other's writing so my depiction of yours would be of the same accuracy authority as your depiction of mine.





Go ahead with your delusions of granduer, but it doesn't change the fact that you are wrong, have been proven wrong well over a thousand times and will continue to be wrong. Go right ahead and do what you have to do to make yourself believe your illogical, convuluted assumptions, I don't feel you have the ability to do otherwise.





QUOTE(Wonder @ May 18 2008, 08:13 AM) [snapback]390635[/snapback]

2./ You are not married to each other, therefore, neither one of you is a wife.



I'm as married as you are in the eyes of God and my wife is beautiful. You have no say in it. You don't determine the status of anyone else's relationship and you are in no place to give judgement on anyone or anything. Sorry you can't comprehend this, but I won't just pretend to accept you to make you go away.

You, wonder, have no authority on any aspect of anything involved in this situation. Although that pains you greatly, it doesn't change the facts. You have no standing, no say, no judgement and no claim to any authority.

My wife and I will continue to pray for you.


QUOTE(Wonder @ May 18 2008, 08:13 AM) [snapback]390635[/snapback]

3./ Why would anyone want to do a DNA test for gender at that stage, anyway?


you were the one harping on DNA, I just gave you a little more info (and you didn't know how to handle it so you went off on a tangent)





SproutingUp
5/18/08
7:03 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 18 2008, 02:00 PM) [snapback]390702[/snapback]
Sorry, but if you are talking emotionally and so on then we get into the nurture part. Since you refuse to believe homosexuality is not curable with therapy, you have set up an impossible conundrum for yourself.

BigMac2. DNA testing at birth would give an indication of male or female, period. I cannot help anyone to understand it, if they will not study the whole pre-natal process from conception to birth. The rest is nurture/environment/psychological/training, etc.. The type of hormonal condition you report has to do with environment, not genetics.

I agree.




wrong again. (no big surprise)

Explain those with the XXY, XXX, XYY chromosomes then.

Oh wait, you can't because you don't know anything about it because your hate-sites don't give you that info.

Go google it and then twist it around to fit your convuluted thinking and report back to us.

btw, Hormones are biological, produced by nature, not produced by nurture. DUH





QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 02:07 PM) [snapback]390703[/snapback]
Wonder what are the psychological nurturing conditions that lead sheep to choose to become gay. Do we have reparative therapy for gay sheep.





The sheep just haven't been told how baaaaaaahhhhd it is. If they only knew, they would "straighten" right up.



QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 18 2008, 02:38 PM) [snapback]390711[/snapback]




Nope, not about me at all. I'm not gay. It's about my uncle and his husband. My two neighbors, the two guys who own the nice house on the edge of town, the girl that I sat next next to in homeroom in high school who I heard got married somewhere in the Carribean last year to another girl from my high school, it's about my good friend (who everyone knows is gay, but still hasn't come out), it's about some of my students (some of whom are open, while others are not), it's about the two ladies I passed yesterday in the grocery store (ya don't need gay-dar to spot some of them), it's about this one dude I know who I ride bikes with (everyone knows he's gay and living with a partner, but he never brings the partner along), it's about the more than a thousand kids I went to college with who were open about their orientation...etc, etc.



Ya' see...it really is about community...only difference is, MY community accepts everyone on equal terms and wishes to see them all enjoy equal rights and acceptance in this world...your community must be a little different. You are more than welcome to join my community. Doesn't cost a cent.





Wow, that is an EXCELLENT post. Thank you.



QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 18 2008, 03:55 PM) [snapback]390725[/snapback]




Just a friendly suggestion...I don't think, if I were in your shoes that I would want to use what is often considered to be one of the world's stupidest animals as an argument for your position. Not trying to be smart or anything, just saying it's a weak argument.





http://www.veganpeace.com/animal_facts/Sheep.htm



Sheep rank in intelligence just below the pig and even with cattle. They react to situations they encounter using instincts that have developed over centuries.



And pigs are considered highly intelligent (the four legged ones, not the two legged ones).



QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 18 2008, 04:06 PM) [snapback]390727[/snapback]
I didn't see this post until last night, and at that point, my head was hurting so badly I didn't have the energy to respond, but now I'm better, so here goes.

Secondly, I do not give out personal information over the internet (tons of reasons, most of which are logical, none of which I will go into because I know I'm likely to just be accused of evading anyway, so there isn't any point). Were she someone I knew in real life, she would probably already have been invited (I've invited homosexual friends to church, I know, shocking).





Of course you would have an excuse. wouldn't want to put your "money where your mouth is", that would be too honest.



Funny how when the obvious is stated (saying homophobic ideas are homophobic) or giving an analogy in response to an anology is "name calling" by one side but not the other. Sounds like a double standard.

The reich-wing are called "sheep" for a reason.





With all these "homosexual friends" that so many claim to have, it looks like they would know a little more about homosexuality instead of having absolutely no idea what they are talking about.
dragonrider
5/18/08
7:07 PM
With all these straight religous conservative friends wonders why I am sitting alone at home responding to talk back rather than out with one of my religous conservative friends basking in their love.
dragonrider
5/18/08
7:25 PM
pastor or Prestonwood Baptists Megachurch in Texas resigned after being caught soliciting sex from a minor on the internet. More of those Family Values Marriage Saving Conservative Ministers I guess. Thank god he was not gay!!!!!!!!
SproutingUp
5/18/08
9:45 PM
QUOTE(Rural Conservative @ May 18 2008, 04:08 PM) [snapback]390729[/snapback]




An animal outside its natural habitat acting differently than they do in the wild? How terribly surprising.





pssst, it happened there BECAUSE it happens in nature wink.gif

There are tons upon tons of reports of it happening in nature alllll the time....

dragonrider
5/18/08
9:57 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 18 2008, 09:45 PM) [snapback]390802[/snapback]




pssst, it happened there BECAUSE it happens in nature wink.gif

There are tons upon tons of reports of it happening in nature alllll the time....

The Mcac monkeys are all the time having gay sex male and female and for shame even masturbating.
dc
5/18/08
9:59 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 07:25 PM) [snapback]390775[/snapback]
pastor or Prestonwood Baptists Megachurch in Texas resigned after being caught soliciting sex from a minor on the internet. More of those Family Values Marriage Saving Conservative Ministers I guess. Thank god he was not gay!!!!!!!!
So are you saying that every single person that attends a Baptist church, or this particular church is like this guy? If you truly believe this, then you are quite dim......
dragonrider
5/18/08
10:09 PM
QUOTE(dc @ May 18 2008, 09:59 PM) [snapback]390814[/snapback]
So are you saying that every single person that attends a Baptist church, or this particular church is like this guy? If you truly believe this, then you are quite dim......
NO NO NO but there sure are a lot of baptists ministers and catholic priests involved sexual indiscretions with minors boys and girls and hiring prostitutes. Just kinda confuses me about all these conservative ministers being involved in sexual crimes.
Nativeson
5/18/08
11:08 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 10:09 PM) [snapback]390818[/snapback]
NO NO NO but there sure are a lot of baptists ministers and catholic priests involved sexual indiscretions with minors boys and girls and hiring prostitutes. Just kinda confuses me about all these conservative ministers being involved in sexual crimes.


Agreed. But in stark contrast to the acceptance and love you and your community professes you slander, demean, stereotype and insult anyone who dares to oppose gay marriage on this forum.

SproutingUp
5/19/08
7:08 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 18 2008, 11:08 PM) [snapback]390830[/snapback]


Agreed. But in stark contrast to the acceptance and love you and your community professes you slander, demean, stereotype and insult anyone who dares to oppose gay marriage on this forum.





First you complain you don't understand. Then people use language you are accustomed to and you complain they are being mean to you.

Examples are given in positive terms and you don't get it. Examples are given that are similar to your own thinking and you whine about it.

Make up your mind already. There were attempts to speak to the homophobic bigots as adults and they couldn't follow the the conversation. It's put in their terms and they get insulted. Seriously, you can't have it both ways.

johnq
5/19/08
8:15 AM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 17 2008, 03:19 PM) [snapback]390475[/snapback]




That's wonderful that he had a supportive church. Now, would your church do it? Would you, personally do it? Would you accept him into your church if you knew he was gay (and let's say celibate and devout to staying celibate) beforehand?

I don't go to church. I am not a Christian. I had no trouble accepting him for who he was. He was one of the people I have most admired in my life.
dragonrider
5/19/08
1:51 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 19 2008, 07:08 AM) [snapback]390863[/snapback]




First you complain you don't understand. Then people use language you are accustomed to and you complain they are being mean to you.

Examples are given in positive terms and you don't get it. Examples are given that are similar to your own thinking and you whine about it.

Make up your mind already. There were attempts to speak to the homophobic bigots as adults and they couldn't follow the the conversation. It's put in their terms and they get insulted. Seriously, you can't have it both ways.

I have tried to be as respectful as I can to those who honestly want to learn and evolve. I have apologized even when I was not sure I was in the wrong giving the benefit of the doubt. I have shared of my life when asked even when painful. In return I have been treated with disrespect, demeaned, insulted and lack of love that has been professed.
SproutingUp
5/19/08
6:41 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 19 2008, 01:51 PM) [snapback]391036[/snapback]
I have tried to be as respectful as I can to those who honestly want to learn and evolve. I have apologized even when I was not sure I was in the wrong giving the benefit of the doubt. I have shared of my life when asked even when painful. In return I have been treated with disrespect, demeaned, insulted and lack of love that has been professed.


Yes, you have been. It's a direct reflection on those who do it and what kind of people they are. You have been much more kind in your responses than I have been to most of them and have been met with ridicule and hatred as a result.

Nativeson
5/19/08
8:44 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 18 2008, 01:14 AM) [snapback]390619[/snapback]
You post your thoughts, here I didn't know you had any thoughts


huh.gif Yes, you have been...??! Allow me to pick up the world's tinest violin and play some background music for the last several posts. Just long enough for you to read this post then I'll switch to screamo for the responses. tongue.gif

The condescension is useful because helps the average person understand that those who are quick to let us know their ethearial IQs are as imperfect and miss the mark as do the rest of us. I actually like keeping this thread going because I like the title and the fact that "hate" and "hatred" appear many times as stereotypical labels angrily slapped on most Americans by militant homosexuals. Even in "progressive" California most people agreed to the hateful definition of marriage as a woman in covenant with a man, which doesn't bode well for homosexuals in other places in which the question may be placed on the ballot.

The motivations of the pro-gay marriage forces become questionable in light of the fact that civil unions addressing in equities in healthcare, etc. were already recognized in California so marriage traditionally defined shouldn't threaten them. So people are left to conclude that there must be a hidden agenda.

It does wonders for the relationship between the gay community and others. dry.gif

dragonrider
5/19/08
8:46 PM
I remember being called on the carpet one time at work. Everyone was standing around talking about their weekends with their spouses and GF's and BF's , I shared what I did that weekend with my GF and was brought into the office. I was told that gay was sexual therefore could be considered sexual harrassment. I asked you mean becuase I said my GF and I went to church on Sunday you consider that sexual harassment to which he replied yes! I replied try it , I want to be a millionare.
2fat2ride
5/19/08
9:21 PM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 19 2008, 08:44 PM) [snapback]391263[/snapback]

The motivations of the pro-gay marriage forces become questionable in light of the fact that civil unions addressing in equities in healthcare, etc. were already recognized in California so marriage traditionally defined shouldn't threaten them. So people are left to conclude that there must be a hidden agenda.

It does wonders for the relationship between the gay community and others. dry.gif



There's no hidden agenda, NS, it's just that the gay community learned a valuable lesson from the African-American's quest for equal rights. Over one hundred and fifty years after the Emancipation Proclamation, and blacks are still struggling for true equality in America.

Every little battle is one step closer to winning the war against irrational cultural bias.



And BTW, I am not gay nor militant...



tugrad
5/19/08
9:32 PM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 19 2008, 08:44 PM) [snapback]391263[/snapback]

huh.gif Yes, you have been...??! Allow me to pick up the world's tinest violin and play some background music for the last several posts. Just long enough for you to read this post then I'll switch to screamo for the responses. tongue.gif

The condescension is useful because helps the average person understand that those who are quick to let us know their ethearial IQs are as imperfect and miss the mark as do the rest of us. I actually like keeping this thread going because I like the title and the fact that "hate" and "hatred" appear many times as stereotypical labels angrily slapped on most Americans by militant homosexuals. Even in "progressive" California most people agreed to the hateful definition of marriage as a woman in covenant with a man, which doesn't bode well for homosexuals in other places in which the question may be placed on the ballot.

The motivations of the pro-gay marriage forces become questionable in light of the fact that civil unions addressing in equities in healthcare, etc. were already recognized in California so marriage traditionally defined shouldn't threaten them. So people are left to conclude that there must be a hidden agenda.

It does wonders for the relationship between the gay community and others. dry.gif

I will only use a few words so you can follow this. State civil unions do not confer federal benefits (social security in the event of a spouses death etc.). Our agenda is EQUAL rights, including Federal Benefits. Civil Unions represent separate and NOT equal.
2fat2ride
5/19/08
10:05 PM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 19 2008, 08:44 PM) [snapback]391263[/snapback]

It does wonders for the relationship between the gay community and others. dry.gif




Hence, the problem. Why should the gay community have to have a "relationship" with the "others?" If they were truly equal, wouldn't they be a part of the same community?



Oh, BTW, drunken math...I suppose it has only been 140 years or so since Emancipation...my bad...doesn't change the logic...

dragonrider
5/19/08
10:09 PM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 19 2008, 10:05 PM) [snapback]391289[/snapback]




Hence, the problem. Why should the gay community have to have a "relationship" with the "others?" If they were truly equal, wouldn't they be a part of the same community

Which is why I choose to belong to a mixed church both gay and straight, we are of the same community one people before god undivided in our faith in a loving god.
dragonrider
5/19/08
10:26 PM
I Corinthians 4:1-5

Think of us in this way, as servants of Christ and stewards of God's mysteries.

Moreover, it is required of stewards tha they be found trustworthy

But with me it is a very small thing that I should be judged by you or by any human court. I do not even judge myself.

I am not aware of anything against myself, but I am not thereby acquitted . It is the Lord who judges me.

Therefore do not pronounce judgement before the time, before the Lord comes, who will bring to light the things now hidden in darkness and will disclose the purposes of the heart. Then each one will receive commendation from God. angel.gif

Wonder
5/19/08
10:30 PM
QUOTE
Since you aren't an authority on...well, anything, you are in no place to judge anything from my writing and I suggest your "research" is nothing more than a google search that desparately looks for something to agree with your distorted logic. Your lack of seeing does not signify a lack of existance. It just means you are either a) blinded by your hatred or b.) incapable of comprehension.

Wrong again! Just saying. Wishing a thing is truth and then stating it as truth, does not make it so. wink.gif It says something about you, but nothing about me.

Thanks for the prayers. I pray a lot for others and appreciate prayers that are said on my behalf.
Nativeson
5/19/08
11:25 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 19 2008, 08:46 PM) [snapback]391264[/snapback]
I remember being called on the carpet one time at work. Everyone was standing around talking about their weekends with their spouses and GF's and BF's , I shared what I did that weekend with my GF and was brought into the office. I was told that gay was sexual therefore could be considered sexual harrassment. I asked you mean becuase I said my GF and I went to church on Sunday you consider that sexual harassment to which he replied yes! I replied try it , I want to be a millionare.


Good for you!

dragonrider
5/19/08
11:27 PM
From Foxnews.com

According to University of Oslo zoologist Petter Böckman, about 1,500 animal species are known to practice same-sex coupling, including bears, gorillas, flamingos, owls, salmon and many others.

"Not every sexual act has a reproductive function," said Janet Mann, a biologist at Georgetown University who studies dolphins (homosexual behavior is very common in these marine mammals). "That's true of humans and non-humans

Marlene Zuk, a biologist at the University of California, Riverside, suggested that gay individuals contribute to the gene pool of their community by nurturing their relatives' young without diverting resources by having their own offspring.

One thing that does seem to be exclusive to humans is homophobia

Hard to dispute this especially when you note the source
dragonrider
5/19/08
11:41 PM
Is this where the religous right would like to take the US?

Gambian President Yahya Jammeh says he will 'cut off the head' of any homosexual caught in his country. Addressing supporters at the end of his meet the farmers tour Sunday, Jammeh also ordered any hotel or motel housing homosexuals to close down, adding that owners of such facilities would also be in trouble. He said the Gambia was a country of believers, indicating that no sinful and immoral act as homosexual would be tolerated in the country. He warned all homosexuals in the country to leave, noting that a legislation 'stricter than those in Iran' concerning the vice would be introduced soon."

SproutingUp
5/20/08
7:02 AM
QUOTE(johnq @ May 19 2008, 08:15 AM) [snapback]390872[/snapback]
I don't go to church. I am not a Christian. I had no trouble accepting him for who he was. He was one of the people I have most admired in my life.




OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

If that is so, then why would you want to prevent him from having the same governmental rights that you have when it comes to marriage or civil unions? Are you more comfortable if they are called civil unions? Are you willing to accept it if it has a different name but gives the same rights and benefits that heterosexual couples have? If so, then why is the word "marriage" so different? The word "marriage" isn't even in the bible. It's implied and people are said to be bound to one another and even Christ attended a wedding festival, but what is so magical about the word "marriage" ?





QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 19 2008, 08:44 PM) [snapback]391263[/snapback]


huh.gif Yes, you have been...??! Allow me to pick up the world's tinest violin and play some background music for the last several posts. Just long enough for you to read this post then I'll switch to screamo for the responses. tongue.gif




This hatefulness is allowed, but if the other side said it, you would be screaming bloody murder. That's hypocricy.



QUOTE(Wonder @ May 19 2008, 10:30 PM) [snapback]391303[/snapback]

[b]Wrong again! Just saying. Wishing a thing is truth and then stating it as truth, does not make it so. wink.gif It says something about you, but nothing about me.


Thanks for the prayers. I pray a lot for others and appreciate prayers that are said on my behalf.
[/b]



LMAO. No, it's right on the money and describes you like a photograph.

Good, I'll continue the praying and ask that God helps bring you the understanding and compassion that you are lacking on this matter.

dragonrider
5/20/08
2:12 PM
Another right wing hypocrite takes a fall as Foella republican representative of NY and key supported of anti gay agenda bills resigns after charges of drunk driving and being involved in an extramarital affair that resulted in a child. The affair was hidden with the help of hush fund money provided by Ma and Pa.

How Family Values!!!!!!

SproutingUp
5/20/08
5:26 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 20 2008, 02:12 PM) [snapback]391630[/snapback]
Another right wing hypocrite takes a fall as Foella republican representative of NY and key supported of anti gay agenda bills resigns after charges of drunk driving and being involved in an extramarital affair that resulted in a child. The affair was hidden with the help of hush fund money provided by Ma and Pa.

How Family Values!!!!!!





At the rate they're dropping, how many are left?

Wonder
5/20/08
6:27 PM
QUOTE
Which is why I choose to belong to a mixed church both gay and straight, we are of the same community one people before god undivided in our faith in a loving god.


I would guess they skip parts of the Bible at your church, dragonrider, or you would not go there. Do they talk about sex in your church, since you mention that "gay" and "straight" people attend your church? I admit that there are certain churches in the county I will not attend. I tend to believe that Bible teaching must be the basis of a church's program or something is lacking. If a church will not teach Biblical truth, then what is the point of the church? Even a murderer who comes to realize their sinful behavior, first has to admit the sin, knows they are incarcerated for the rest of their life, and seeks pardon of God. What is a church if some sins are not even addressed? How is that a Christian church? Educate me. "Your sins will be washed whiter than snow." First we have to admit and confess our sins. ALL of our sins. We do not get to pick and choose which parts of the Bible are true and which do not apply to us.

Makita
5/20/08
6:31 PM
Wonder,



Why does everything come back to sex with you. Are you obsessed with it or just extremely lacking. Please inquiring minds want to know.

BuffaloBill
5/20/08
6:35 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 20 2008, 06:27 PM) [snapback]391726[/snapback]
I would guess they skip parts of the Bible at your church, dragonrider, or you would not go there. Do they talk about sex in your church, since you mention that "gay" and "straight" people attend your church? I admit that there are certain churches in the county I will not attend. I tend to believe that Bible teaching must be the basis of a church's program or something is lacking. If a church will not teach Biblical truth, then what is the point of the church? Even a murderer who comes to realize their sinful behavior, first has to admit the sin, knows they are incarcerated for the rest of their life, and seeks pardon of God. What is a church if some sins are not even addressed? How is that a Christian church? Educate me. "Your sins will be washed whiter than snow." First we have to admit and confess our sins. ALL of our sins. We do not get to pick and choose which parts of the Bible are true and which do not apply to us.




I wonder why there were books left out of the bible in the first place, seems to me that none of the Christian churches use the whole bible, as it was originally drafted



That's one mighty big glass house dry.gif
Makita
5/20/08
6:38 PM
Bill,



Not what I expect from you. I vote for you as favorite poster because I can always use a good laugh. Not enough in this world. Being serious is fine but keep the laughs coming.

dragonrider
5/20/08
7:05 PM
The story of homosexuality was about wild animals not animals in captivity. Perhaps as has been said to me you should read my post completely before responding with ignorance.

Wonder, My church teaches the whole bible, we just interpret it differently than yours.

I wonder if you read the scripture I posted of Corintheans about your judgement of me or my own judgement of myself is meaningless as we must all wait for the final judgement of Christ on his return.



You judge me and judge my church is that the bible they are teaching in your church. Not judging others is very fundamental to the Christian faith.

johnq
5/21/08
7:12 AM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 20 2008, 07:02 AM) [snapback]391365[/snapback]




OK, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

If that is so, then why would you want to prevent him from having the same governmental rights that you have when it comes to marriage or civil unions? Are you more comfortable if they are called civil unions? Are you willing to accept it if it has a different name but gives the same rights and benefits that heterosexual couples have? If so, then why is the word "marriage" so different? The word "marriage" isn't even in the bible. It's implied and people are said to be bound to one another and even Christ attended a wedding festival, but what is so magical about the word "marriage" ?

He's dead. His rights have been taken away since 1990.

It would be helpful if you would bother to read posts, instead of just attacking anyone and everyone. I have not once said I oppose gay marriage.

SproutingUp
5/21/08
6:05 PM
QUOTE(Makita @ May 20 2008, 06:31 PM) [snapback]391728[/snapback]
Wonder,



Why does everything come back to sex with you. Are you obsessed with it or just extremely lacking. Please inquiring minds want to know.





Notice that too huh?

QUOTE(BuffaloBill @ May 20 2008, 06:35 PM) [snapback]391729[/snapback]




I wonder why there were books left out of the bible in the first place, seems to me that none of the Christian churches use the whole bible, as it was originally drafted



That's one mighty big glass house dry.gif


Excellent point!!

Constantine didn't want certain things in there because they didn't mesh with his opinions, so he had them left out. They're coming to surface though and more and more are being found (Early Christian writings just like the writings that are parts of the book called the bible which literally means "book".) It's a book made up of various, unconnected writings from various people of the time. Why did Constintine feel he had the right to determine what went in and what didn't?

At least 50% of it is congruent to the Quran, and we have the extremists doing things like burning, shooting and flushing it down the toilet when it contains some of the same writings of the book they proclaim to contain the whole of their beliefs.



QUOTE(johnq @ May 21 2008, 07:12 AM) [snapback]391864[/snapback]
He's dead. His rights have been taken away since 1990.

It would be helpful if you would bother to read posts, instead of just attacking anyone and everyone. I have not once said I oppose gay marriage.





Sorry that your dear friend passed away.

Now, on another thread they were talking about your wife....how cute is she?

bigstew
5/21/08
10:47 PM
This thread still going? God gill, you be nothing without the gay marriage debate. Stop pretending, come out and embrace it.
Bigmaclender2
5/21/08
10:51 PM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 21 2008, 10:47 PM) [snapback]392263[/snapback]
This thread still going? God gill, you be nothing without the gay marriage debate. Stop pretending, come out and embrace it.




bigstew, why all the hatred and disgust??? Did you read my post? I think it might calm things down for a bit........

dragonrider
5/22/08
1:01 AM
So John McBush's Pastor Hagee thinks that God created Hitler to force the Jews to return to Israel. Can some one show me where in the bible it says that? And still McBush refuses to denounce Pastor Hagee. blink.gif
Beth
5/22/08
1:10 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 22 2008, 01:01 AM) [snapback]392292[/snapback]

So John McBush's Pastor Hagee thinks that God created Hitler to force the Jews to return to Israel. Can some one show me where in the bible it says that? And still McBush refuses to denounce Pastor Hagee. blink.gif

Hezikiah 4:19! One of Bush's favorite passages! wink.gif
Wonder
5/22/08
1:16 AM
QUOTE
Wonder, My church teaches the whole bible, we just interpret it differently than yours.
We don't interpret the Bible at my church. When the Bible says that certain things are a sin, they are a sin. Bible truth is truth and not open to further interpretation. You seem to wish me to sin. You, who claim Christianity for yourself, know that the Bible is appropriate for teaching and rebuking. Therefore, if I do not approach you in Love and tell you the truth, I am guilty and will be held accountable on the day of judgement.

Bill, if that glass house comment included me: I have never practiced the homosexual lifestyle and have no plans so to do. I am not perfect. There have been a few times in the past, that a friend or my sister have confronted me and questioned me on one thing or other about my life. We are on this earth to Love one another and help one another through this life. I always take comments made to me under consideration. One time [on here], the comment was not even directed at me, but I noticed a similar motivation of my own was lacking the correct spirit, and accepted and prayed about the comment I saw in writing.

BigMac2 and I, and tugrad and I, seem to have set our boundaries for the most part with each other. Now when either of them says something directly to me that seems edgy, I have to consider whether I have steped outside of my usual framework before I comment again. We will each repeat things we have said before on here. I suspect it is more for others who are new and not for we, ourselves, that we repeat our points of view.
QUOTE
Wonder,
Why does everything come back to sex with you. Are you obsessed with it or just extremely lacking. Please inquiring minds want to know.
Makita. I am not the person who mentioned that "gay" and "straight" go to his church. The terms have only to do with homosexuality and heterosexuality which are behaviors related to sexual relations and same or opposite sex. I am not the one who muddies the waters with political terms, but now I am accused of something or other because I discussed something else you did not agree with. Now you must attack me to make yourself feel better. That does not make the homosexual lifestyle choser look good at all. This tells me that there are bullies within the homosexual lifestyle community and I am being victimized by your attack.
dragonrider
5/22/08
1:58 AM
It must be wonderful to live in this world of yours that is so black and white. The rest of the world besides you does not.

The Bible is for so much more than teaching and rebuking, I am so sorry that you can not see that.
Bigby_M
5/22/08
5:54 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 22 2008, 01:01 AM) [snapback]392292[/snapback]
So John McBush's Pastor Hagee thinks that God created Hitler to force the Jews to return to Israel. Can some one show me where in the bible it says that? And still McBush refuses to denounce Pastor Hagee. blink.gif


Not to worry. McCain has a flip -flop is scheduled for later in the week. laugh.gif

Now where is all the faux outrage from those who held Obama accountable for Wright's comments.

God created Hitler to kill most of the Jews in Europe so they could move to Israel? Yeah Hagee shouldn't be in a straight jacket or anything.

Step right up folks, it is spin time. laugh.gif

I can't wait to hear this.



These are the same fools who would rather start a war with Iran rather than follow the instructions from the Sermon on the Mount. laugh.gif



And why not? God loves war, if he didn't he wouldn't have made Hitler, right? laugh.gif
iconoclast
5/22/08
6:40 AM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 17 2008, 08:05 AM) [snapback]390360[/snapback]
Or it could be that some people are comfortable with the world they grew up in. Why try to box everyone in to such a narrow view of the world?




"Traditional values" is just such a narrow view bigstew, why would one wish to "box" all into such a construct? A construct by the way which is nothing more that a euphimism for "my way or the highway."

And, if everyone were "comfortable with the world they grew up in," we'd still be living in frigging trees - or caves.

ph34r.gif



QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 19 2008, 08:44 PM) [snapback]391263[/snapback]


huh.gif Yes, you have been...??! Allow me to pick up the world's tinest violin and play some background music for the last several posts. Just long enough for you to read this post then I'll switch to screamo for the responses. tongue.gif

The condescension is useful because helps the average person understand that those who are quick to let us know their ethearial IQs are as imperfect and miss the mark as do the rest of us. I actually like keeping this thread going because I like the title and the fact that "hate" and "hatred" appear many times as stereotypical labels angrily slapped on most Americans by militant homosexuals. Even in "progressive" California most people agreed to the hateful definition of marriage as a woman in covenant with a man, which doesn't bode well for homosexuals in other places in which the question may be placed on the ballot.

The motivations of the pro-gay marriage forces become questionable in light of the fact that civil unions addressing in equities in healthcare, etc. were already recognized in California so marriage traditionally defined shouldn't threaten them. So people are left to conclude that there must be a hidden agenda.

It does wonders for the relationship between the gay community and others. dry.gif





"ethearial?"

ph34r.gif

podunk
5/22/08
8:31 AM
QUOTE
Now where is all the faux outrage from those who held Obama accountable for Wright's comments.

We all know that McCain attended Hagee's church for years. Hagee was his mentor and friend. Hagee served on his campaign. Yes, the two deserve equal outrage!
cyberscribbler
5/22/08
8:35 AM
QUOTE(Bigby_M)
These are the same fools who would rather start a war with Iran

The dominionst are coming home to roost in the McCain camp.
QUOTE
John McCain has some seriously screwed-up holy men surrounding him. First, there's the Rev. John Hagee, a hate-monger and certifiable loon who believes that Hurricane Katrina was God's judgment on New Orleans for planning a gay parade, calls Catholicism a "false cult system" that conspired with Hitler to exterminate the Jews, and believes that America's divine duty is to destroy Iran. Then there's the Rev. Rod Parsley, who garnishes his bigoted theology by calling Islam "the greatest religious enemy of our civilization and the world" and saying that Muhammad was "a mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil."
Good God, they're losing they're collective minds.
Immigrants, Iranians & gays are out to destroy us.
rolleyes.gif
dragonrider
5/22/08
2:25 PM
Another ExGay bites the dust, Thockmorton producer of a movie about his transformation to an ExGay has come out of the closet and said nope ExGay didn't work still gay. Get reparitive therapy don't work it aint a choice, be all you can be.
bigstew
5/22/08
6:00 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 21 2008, 10:51 PM) [snapback]392266[/snapback]




bigstew, why all the hatred and disgust??? Did you read my post? I think it might calm things down for a bit........

Hatred and disgust? Where did ya get that from?
Makita
5/22/08
7:39 PM
Wonder,
Why does everything come back to sex with you. Are you obsessed with it or just extremely lacking. Please inquiring minds want to know.


Makita. I am not the person who mentioned that "gay" and "straight" go to his church. The terms have only to do with homosexuality and heterosexuality which are behaviors related to sexual relations and same or opposite sex. I am not the one who muddies the waters with political terms, but now I am accused of something or other because I discussed something else you did not agree with. Now you must attack me to make yourself feel better. That does not make the homosexual lifestyle choser look good at all. This tells me that there are bullies within the homosexual lifestyle community and I am being victimized by your attack.



Wonder,



I'm not homosexual. You mention straights or heterosexuality, and then use the terms as behaviors related to sexual relations, I'm not sure but I don't think this has anything to do with politics but what occurs in a normal relationship. I could be wrong.
Wonder
5/22/08
7:58 PM
QUOTE
The Bible is for so much more than teaching and rebuking, I am so sorry that you can not see that.
I realize the Bible is for much more than teaching and rebuking. However, the Bible is not open to interpretation by different denominations. I was clarifying my stand and not limiting the scope of the Bible. dry.gif Do not insert words or motivations into my writing [putting words into my mouth does not quite fit].



Makita. I do not subscribe to the terms, "gay"/homosexual and "straight"/heterosexual, because those are political terms which describe lifestyles associated with behavioral preference. Male and Female are biological terms. We end up talking apples and oranges when we substitute political terms for biological terms.

Makita
5/22/08
8:07 PM
Unbelievable, I have to ask, have you ever had relations??????????

Bigmaclender2
5/22/08
8:52 PM
QUOTE(bigstew @ May 22 2008, 06:00 PM) [snapback]392671[/snapback]
Hatred and disgust? Where did ya get that from?




I'm thinking it was a lame attempt at sarcasm I guess. LOL

tugrad
5/22/08
9:03 PM
QUOTE(Makita @ May 22 2008, 08:07 PM) [snapback]392695[/snapback]

Unbelievable, I have to ask, have you ever had relations??????????

Yeah, her posts get kinda confusing. I think she is trying to say that any woman who is sexually attracted to another woman (in our terms a lesbian) is really a man. And and man who is attracted to another man (our terms gay) is really a woman. I think that is why she has suggested that all babies have DNA testing to determine their biological gender.

Problem is that transgender is not not the same as gay. Many gay people are perfectly happy as the gender they were born as they just aren't attracted to members of the opposite sex.
bigstew
5/22/08
9:46 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 22 2008, 08:52 PM) [snapback]392705[/snapback]




I'm thinking it was a lame attempt at sarcasm I guess. LOL

Looking back at it now, I can see why. I was really taking gil to task over the whole gay marriage debate, which he uses to his benefit like he accuses politicians using it as a wedge issue. He has become what he has beheld, unless he has always been such.

I really didn't attempt the sarcasm with the whole come out thing.

dragonrider
5/22/08
10:52 PM
QUOTE(tugrad @ May 22 2008, 09:03 PM) [snapback]392707[/snapback]

Yeah, her posts get kinda confusing. I think she is trying to say that any woman who is sexually attracted to another woman (in our terms a lesbian) is really a man. And and man who is attracted to another man (our terms gay) is really a woman. I think that is why she has suggested that all babies have DNA testing to determine their biological gender.

Problem is that transgender is not not the same as gay. Many gay people are perfectly happy as the gender they were born as they just aren't attracted to members of the opposite sex.
She seems to be saying that in saying heterosexual or homosexual you are talking about sexual acts as she does not see that a homosexual person exists . So when I say there homosexuals in my church she seems to be saying that I must talk about sexual acts becuase homosexuality is a sex act not a person.



There are so many denominations in the world Wonder, are you saying that only your denomination has the totally correct divination of the bible becuase even Jesus said that was impossible and that the bible and Gods full word would only be fully understood in the end days. Even withing the same denomination there are differences in how the bible is interpreted.



You are the one that said the Bible is for educating and rebuking and left it at that my only interpretation is that is what you meant the bible is for educating and rebuking. Words have meaning.

SproutingUp
5/23/08
11:45 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 22 2008, 01:16 AM) [snapback]392297[/snapback]
We don't interpret the Bible at my church. When the Bible says that certain things are a sin, they are a sin. Bible truth is truth and not open to further interpretation.




So you LITERALLY burn bulls at the alter, never cut your hair, sell your daughters into slavery, don't wear clothes of two different fibers (all cotton, all the time), you don't work on Sunday, you follow ancient jewish laws for the clerics to a T?

If not, you just showed yourself to be a blatant liar and that's one of the "big ten".



QUOTE(podunk @ May 22 2008, 08:31 AM) [snapback]392354[/snapback]

We all know that McCain attended Hagee's church for years. Hagee was his mentor and friend. Hagee served on his campaign. Yes, the two deserve equal outrage!




Just wondering, did McCain write an autobiography and use the title of one of Hagee's sermons as inspiration for the title?

SproutingUp
5/24/08
12:05 AM
QUOTE(Makita @ May 22 2008, 07:39 PM) [snapback]392689[/snapback]
Wonder,
Why does everything come back to sex with you. Are you obsessed with it or just extremely lacking. Please inquiring minds want to know.


Makita. I am not the person who mentioned that "gay" and "straight" go to his church. The terms have only to do with homosexuality and heterosexuality which are behaviors related to sexual relations and same or opposite sex. I am not the one who muddies the waters with political terms, but now I am accused of something or other because I discussed something else you did not agree with. Now you must attack me to make yourself feel better. That does not make the homosexual lifestyle choser look good at all. This tells me that there are bullies within the homosexual lifestyle community and I am being victimized by your attack.



Wonder,



I'm not homosexual. You mention straights or heterosexuality, and then use the terms as behaviors related to sexual relations, I'm not sure but I don't think this has anything to do with politics but what occurs in a normal relationship. I could be wrong.




With the fixation on sex, maybe in her church, they have a giant orgy every sunday or something.

Why is it that the homophobes are always so fixated on sex? It's sex this, sex that, always about sexual relations and then they call homosexuals "perverts". I don't get it.

It's been a while since my wife and I had any sexual contact due to our busy lives. We've been intimate, but, there just hasn't been time for sex. That being the case, does that mean we aren't homosexual since it only counts during the actual act for the homophobes?

That's one of the reasons I like the term "gay" or "lesbian" as opposed to homosexual because it automatically denotes sex and it's not about sex, it's about intimacy and love.

Are heterosexuals only about sex and nothing else? Is that the entire basis of their relationship? Nothing but sex? Everything else doesn't count? Why they unable to comprehend that homosexuals and heterosexuas are EXACTLY the same. They have a relationship with someone with which they have an emotional bond and share intimacy with, someone they plan to spend their life with, sex is a small part of it, a very, very small part of it, just like it is in their relationship. There is SO MUCH more to it.

It's a shame that someone is so self serving, so selfish, so inhumane, so egotistical and so hung up on themselves and what they see as right or wrong that nobody else in the world has a right to live in a decent manner or as human beings for that manner.

Anyone who is not, themselves, a homosexual, has absolutely no say in the matter at all. It has no effect on them in any way, there is no reason for them to be involved in the matter, but they force themselves into the middle because for some reason, they think they have the right to tell other people how to live.



QUOTE(Wonder @ May 22 2008, 07:58 PM) [snapback]392694[/snapback]
I realize the Bible is for much more than teaching and rebuking. However, the Bible is not open to interpretation by different denominations. I was clarifying my stand and not limiting the scope of the Bible. dry.gif Do not insert words or motivations into my writing [putting words into my mouth does not quite fit].



Makita. I do not subscribe to the terms, "gay"/homosexual and "straight"/heterosexual, because those are political terms which describe lifestyles associated with behavioral preference. Male and Female are biological terms. We end up talking apples and oranges when we substitute political terms for biological terms.





That makes zero sense. The bible is not only open to translation, translation is a fundamental requirement. If it isn't translated, then you should be dressed as a jewish woman from 2000+ years ago, living even more oudatedly than the Amish do. You DEFINITELY shouldn't be on a computer, they didn't have computers in the bible and you aren't allowed to translate it to make it ok, so you need to dispose of yours ASAP. You also named yourself after a mythical figure with supposed supernatural powers who was trained by Amazons, not very Christian at all.

You are the biggest flip-flopper on this board. Either mean it, or don't say it because you have, yet again, make a fool of yourself. It use to be fun to watch you completely destroy your own argument, but now, it's just getting boring and somewhat annoying.

So, ms. betty bowers, what are you going to bring up next that everybody has to live and obey, with the exception of you of course?

tugrad
5/24/08
10:17 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 24 2008, 12:05 AM) [snapback]393197[/snapback]


It's been a while since my wife and I had any sexual contact due to our busy lives. We've been intimate, but, there just hasn't been time for sex. That being the case, does that mean we aren't homosexual since it only counts during the actual act for the homophobes?

I saw a comedian that stated "Between work and the kids my wife and I haven't had time for sex. Does that mean I am asexual?"
dragonrider
5/24/08
10:32 PM
QUOTE(tugrad @ May 24 2008, 10:17 PM) [snapback]393359[/snapback]

I saw a comedian that stated "Between work and the kids my wife and I haven't had time for sex. Does that mean I am asexual?"
If you are bigendered and bisexual does that make you Quadrasexual or Trysexual since I'll try anything once tongue.gif
Nativeson
5/24/08
11:24 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 24 2008, 12:05 AM) [snapback]393197[/snapback]


It's been a while since my wife and I had any sexual contact due to our busy lives. We've been intimate, but, there just hasn't been time for sex. That being the case, does that mean we aren't homosexual since it only counts during the actual act for the homophobes?



I'm not obsessed enough with your sex life to want to know this much detail. Chances are Wonder doesn't spend a lot of time wondering about it either. Here's a suggestion: Cut your essays on talkback down to flippant remarks and you'll have more time for your partner. ph34r.gif biggrin.gif

The last time I went to a meeting on family values I was handed a brochure (lecturing me on family values) by a lady who now says she's slept with dozens of women. Then I was lectured on family values by a guy who's since been convicted of multiple counts of child molestation and possession of child pornography. So this "Heterosexuals are obsessed with sex and have orgies in their church services while gays are clean and pure as the wind driven snow" stuff falls flat. You're people just like the rest of us. The only difference being the lifestyle you want us to accept is listed in our reference for morality in the same category as lying, adultery, fornication, etc. That's why good people have reason to pause.

dragonrider
5/26/08
12:42 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 24 2008, 11:24 PM) [snapback]393368[/snapback]


. That's why good people have reason to pause.

And what would your reason be.
Bigmaclender2
5/26/08
9:31 AM
I want everyone that reads this to look at the headline of this post one more time. It's hard to distinguish between hate and conviction sometimes. A lot of this posting is just sounding like outright hate and that makes you no better than who you think is doing the hating. Two wrongs don't make a right. Take the higher road and let it go. Agree to disagree......however you want to word it I'm sure that you know what I mean.

Scout
5/26/08
9:33 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 24 2008, 11:24 PM) [snapback]393368[/snapback]

Here's a suggestion: Cut your essays on talkback down to flippant remarks and you'll have more time for your partner. ph34r.gif biggrin.gif


Sorry, Nativeson, Sprouting's partner is also on TB biggrin.gif Live and in person, so to speak. Funny, work and church seem to take much more of our time than than TB does. It's amazing how little time it takes to write an "essay" when you type 80 wpm rolleyes.gif

Bigmaclender2
5/26/08
9:39 AM
QUOTE(Scout @ May 26 2008, 09:33 AM) [snapback]393617[/snapback]


Sorry, Nativeson, Sprouting's partner is also on TB biggrin.gif Live and in person, so to speak. Funny, work and church seem to take much more of our time than than TB does. It's amazing how little time it takes to write an "essay" when you type 80 wpm rolleyes.gif





Yeah, I still can't figure out why you don't use the church as your mailing address-you would get things much quicker that way. (as you are there every day and sometimes more than once a day. I am witness to that firsthand.......)

Wonder
5/26/08
9:55 AM
QUOTE
She seems to be saying that in saying heterosexual or homosexual you are talking about sexual acts as she does not see that a homosexual person exists . So when I say there homosexuals in my church she seems to be saying that I must talk about sexual acts becuase homosexuality is a sex act not a person.


Wow!!! Methinks you finally understand my viewpoint. You are born male or female, genetically. There are NO bi or transgender genes, either. YES, this is my point about the DNA testing. This has nothing to do with hate or phobias. This is the framework through which I work. If you think about it, "love the person and hate the sin", must have an explaination. When you seek truth, the truth will set you free. You may even come to believe my viewpoint if you research diligently, and continue to chose the same lifestyle. That would not mean I would hate you. That would mean that we have agreed to disagree on one less point.

I type 110 WPM but then need to go back and correct spelling...and those spaces that I cannot seem to figure out.

dragonrider
5/26/08
10:41 AM
Understand your viewpoint, yes Agree with your viewpoint never. My own research is quite extensive on top of a degree in biochemistry and contradicts your research. But we will just have to agree to disagree and I don't hate you for your lifestyle choice either. rolleyes.gif

Scout
5/26/08
10:55 AM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 26 2008, 09:55 AM) [snapback]393626[/snapback]
I type 110 WPM but then need to go back and correct spelling...and those spaces that I cannot seem to figure out.


I was at 120/97% in college, 17 years ago. I am probably closer to 100 when I am typing my own thoughts.



QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 26 2008, 09:39 AM) [snapback]393622[/snapback]

Yeah, I still can't figure out why you don't use the church as your mailing address-you would get things much quicker that way. (as you are there every day and sometimes more than once a day. I am witness to that firsthand.......)


Yes, well, I sometimes get mail there with my name on it, but it is church mail, not mine wink.gif Funny, my old church had to beg me to do C/Y group Bible study ... this church I am over-involved. Whodathunk? And, I am not in the building every day ... I lead a Bible Study in my house one night a week hehehe

dragonrider
5/26/08
11:10 AM
QUOTE(Scout @ May 26 2008, 10:55 AM) [snapback]393638[/snapback]


I was at 120/97% in college, 17 years ago. I am probably closer to 100 when I am typing my own thoughts.





Yes, well, I sometimes get mail there with my name on it, but it is church mail, not mine wink.gif Funny, my old church had to beg me to do C/Y group Bible study ... this church I am over-involved. Whodathunk? And, I am not in the building every day ... I lead a Bible Study in my house one night a week hehehe

do you use out in faith for bible study, I find it a wonderful bible study and study it every week
Wonder
5/26/08
11:32 AM
QUOTE
Understand your viewpoint, yes Agree with your viewpoint never. My own research is quite extensive on top of a degree in biochemistry and contradicts your research. But we will just have to agree to disagree and I don't hate you for your lifestyle choice either. rolleyes.gif
My degree[s] are not in biochemistry but I have studied genetics and continue to look at things objectively. A good researcher will sustain their own beliefs when reading research findings and enjoy discovery. I fear this is not evident in any research I have read by certain groups, both Christian and the homosexual choice people. I tend to look for good science.



Enjoy the day.

SproutingUp
5/26/08
12:02 PM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 24 2008, 11:24 PM) [snapback]393368[/snapback]


I'm not obsessed enough with your sex life to want to know this much detail. Chances are Wonder doesn't spend a lot of time wondering about it either. Here's a suggestion: Cut your essays on talkback down to flippant remarks and you'll have more time for your partner. ph34r.gif biggrin.gif





That's not true at all. In fact, you and especially wonder are SO entralled by my sex life that she, at least, bases her entire existance on it. It is so important to her when, where, why and with who I have sex that she has become so entangled in the thought of the sex lives of others that she feels the need to dictate to everyon what they can and cannot do and want to pass laws and make ammendments to the constitution dependent upon MY sex life. She's at the point that the most important thing in her life is knowing every single detail of my sex life with each intricate detail so she can adequately pass judgement on it since she has taken on the role of God (she must think He's not doing a good enough job and needs to take up his slack).

My sex life is at the CENTER of your (the homophobes) entire argument and it's so important to you that you are ready to change the entire intent of the US constitution because you don't realize that it isn't a requirement that you engage in a homosexual marriage just because it exists.

Nativeson
5/26/08
12:02 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 26 2008, 12:42 AM) [snapback]393594[/snapback]
And what would your reason be.


laugh.gif laugh.gif

SproutingUp
5/26/08
12:07 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 26 2008, 09:55 AM) [snapback]393626[/snapback]


I type 110 WPM but then need to go back and correct spelling...and those spaces that I cannot seem to figure out.





I type 120, so you lose to the homosexuals again tongue.gif



QUOTE(Wonder @ May 26 2008, 11:32 AM) [snapback]393649[/snapback]
My degree[s] are not in biochemistry but I have studied genetics and continue to look at things objectively. A good researcher will sustain their own beliefs when reading research findings and enjoy discovery. I fear this is not evident in any research I have read by certain groups, both Christian and the homosexual choice people. I tend to look for good science.

Enjoy the day.





my guess would be something like english lit or library sciences... very non-scientific even though you fancy yourself to be much more.

Those are the degrees people go for when they can't hack the real majors.

dragonrider
5/26/08
12:35 PM
QUOTE(Wonder @ May 26 2008, 11:32 AM) [snapback]393649[/snapback]
My degree[s] are not in biochemistry but I have studied genetics and continue to look at things objectively. A good researcher will sustain their own beliefs when reading research findings and enjoy discovery. I fear this is not evident in any research I have read by certain groups, both Christian and the homosexual choice people. I tend to look for good science.



Enjoy the day.

A good researcher disregards their own beliefs when reading research findings of others and take as much joy in research that contradicts their beliefs as in research that supports their beliefs. But then that is reputable scientists and peer reviewed research neither of which have I seen you quote. cool.gif
Makita
5/26/08
1:19 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 26 2008, 12:35 PM) [snapback]393668[/snapback]
A good researcher disregards their own beliefs when reading research findings of others and take as much joy in research that contradicts their beliefs as in research that supports their beliefs. But then that is reputable scientists and peer reviewed research neither of which have I seen you quote. cool.gif




Dragon,



Not when your dealing with religious zealots. There is no way but theirs. No amount of research, opinions or anything else matter to them. They are completely closed to everything but what they believe to be the truth. Thankfully they are a small group and the majority of the people find them as annoying as you do.

Bigmaclender2
5/26/08
1:25 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 26 2008, 10:41 AM) [snapback]393634[/snapback]
Understand your viewpoint, yes Agree with your viewpoint never. My own research is quite extensive on top of a degree in biochemistry and contradicts your research. But we will just have to agree to disagree and I don't hate you for your lifestyle choice either. rolleyes.gif





I have always found that experience is the best teacher. I know that I have been gay since birth and at birth didn't even know what a choice about sex was. I am who I am-tell them all to deal with it or shut the heck up. You are right on so many levels but you really are beating a dead horse. I know that you know I don't mean this offensively but at least we know the real truth.

dragonrider
5/26/08
1:58 PM
QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ May 26 2008, 01:25 PM) [snapback]393678[/snapback]




I have always found that experience is the best teacher. I know that I have been gay since birth and at birth didn't even know what a choice about sex was. I am who I am-tell them all to deal with it or shut the heck up. You are right on so many levels but you really are beating a dead horse. I know that you know I don't mean this offensively but at least we know the real truth.

One can not change an opinion based on emotion or faith with an argument based on logic. No offense taken when none is given. Understand that some folks have ears but never hear, eyes but never see but a mouth that never ceases to spew illogic( nicer word than I am thinking) and the Lord wil have a reward for them in the judgement. For God said it is not what goes in the mouth that condemns a man ohmy.gif but what comes out.
SproutingUp
5/26/08
5:30 PM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 24 2008, 11:24 PM) [snapback]393368[/snapback]


The last time I went to a meeting on family values I was handed a brochure (lecturing me on family values) by a lady who now says she's slept with dozens of women. Then I was lectured on family values by a guy who's since been convicted of multiple counts of child molestation and possession of child pornography. So this "Heterosexuals are obsessed with sex and have orgies in their church services while gays are clean and pure as the wind driven snow" stuff falls flat. You're people just like the rest of us. The only difference being the lifestyle you want us to accept is listed in our reference for morality in the same category as lying, adultery, fornication, etc. That's why good people have reason to pause.





No, it's considered to be in that category by YOU. We don't consider it even close to those things because it isn't.

Could you please tell me what this supposed "lifestyle" is that you keep refrencing? I really want to know. You see, my "lifestyle" consists of getting up in the morning, going to work, coming home, having dinner, watching a little tv, spending some time on the internet, having conversations with my family about my day and theirs, going to bed and doing it all over again the next day. I can't understand exactly what this "lifestyle" holds that is any different from what I assumed others did. Do you do something different from this? Do you have wild sex parties or something? Do you have a dozen or so people over every night and plot how to take over the world? What exactly do you "straight homophobic" people do that is so different from what I do that would make my activities of daily living be labeled a "lifestyle" that should be looked down on?



QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 26 2008, 12:35 PM) [snapback]393668[/snapback]
A good researcher disregards their own beliefs when reading research findings of others and take as much joy in research that contradicts their beliefs as in research that supports their beliefs. But then that is reputable scientists and peer reviewed research neither of which have I seen you quote. cool.gif




guess she's just not a good researcher and definitely not on par with a reputable scientist. It's all about her opinion and how she can change research so that it supports what she wants it to. I would call her a spin doctor, but she's really not that good at it. Maybe a spin technician...mostly just a spin regurgitator.



QUOTE(Makita @ May 26 2008, 01:19 PM) [snapback]393675[/snapback]




Dragon,



Not when your dealing with religious zealots. There is no way but theirs. No amount of research, opinions or anything else matter to them. They are completely closed to everything but what they believe to be the truth. Thankfully they are a small group and the majority of the people find them as annoying as you do.





Amen!

Thanks to decent, intelligent people like you and others on here, the world isn't subjected to their whims.

I like to think of folks like you as being of the type that would have helped in the underground railroad many years ago, or would have marched in the parades and participated in the peaceful opposition to such horrible things as slavery, equal rights and such. It's good to know that the ideas and the people who value them (of equality for all) are still around and still vocal enough to keep the not so silent minority from declaring themselves a majority and forcing their views into laws that effect everyone.

Thanks for being you. (and to the others out there who are being themselves instead of trying to deny other humans basic human rights)

tugrad
5/26/08
10:25 PM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 26 2008, 05:30 PM) [snapback]393706[/snapback]


Could you please tell me what this supposed "lifestyle" is that you keep refrencing? I really want to know. You see, my "lifestyle" consists of getting up in the morning, going to work, coming home, having dinner, watching a little tv, spending some time on the internet, having conversations with my family about my day and theirs, going to bed and doing it all over again the next day. I can't understand exactly what this "lifestyle" holds that is any different from what I assumed others did. Do you do something different from this? Do you have wild sex parties or something? Do you have a dozen or so people over every night and plot how to take over the world? What exactly do you "straight homophobic" people do that is so different from what I do that would make my activities of daily living be labeled a "lifestyle" that should be looked down on?


I am also wondering about the homosexual "lifestyle". My "lifestyle" sounds a lot like yours just add some parenting responsibilities. Pretty boring stuff. I've got to imagine that it bores the heck out of the folks who think we hold sex parties every weekend.

Hope you got out to enjoy the beautiful weekend.
dragonrider
5/26/08
10:40 PM
QUOTE(tugrad @ May 26 2008, 10:25 PM) [snapback]393783[/snapback]

I am also wondering about the homosexual "lifestyle". My "lifestyle" sounds a lot like yours just add some parenting responsibilities. Pretty boring stuff. I've got to imagine that it bores the heck out of the folks who think we hold sex parties every weekend.

Hope you got out to enjoy the beautiful weekend.
Yeah experience the homosexual lifestyle again today, went grocery shopping , cleaned my apartment, window shopped at a high gas milage car and made some sugar free jello. This homosexual lifestyle is pretty exciting. After all this excitemnt I might have to go to bed early.
tugrad
5/26/08
10:42 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 26 2008, 10:40 PM) [snapback]393787[/snapback]

Yeah experience the homosexual lifestyle again today, went grocery shopping , cleaned my apartment, window shopped at a high gas milage car and made some sugar free jello. This homosexual lifestyle is pretty exciting. After all this excitemnt I might have to go to bed early.

Oh, Oh. I can't stand it. The horror. We experienced the "homosexual lifestyle" with another couple! We even included out children and one of our mother's. We went kayaking.
Nativeson
5/27/08
12:21 AM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 26 2008, 05:30 PM) [snapback]393706[/snapback]

Do you have wild sex parties or something? Do you have a dozen or so people over every night and plot how to take over the world? What exactly do you "straight homophobic" people do that is so different from what I do that would make my activities of daily living be labeled a "lifestyle" that should be looked down on?


You can write "straight" and I know exactly what you mean and I write "homosexual lifestyle" and we're supposed to go through the pretense that you don't understand what I mean by that? I may be time to again write of your genetic superiority to me. laugh.gif

Here's one I don't understand:

QUOTE


Oh, Oh. I can't stand it. The horror. We experienced the "homosexual lifestyle" with another couple! We even included out children and one of our mother's. We went kayaking.



How does one know when children are "out"? biggrin.gif

2fat2ride
5/27/08
6:30 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 27 2008, 12:21 AM) [snapback]393797[/snapback]

You can write "straight" and I know exactly what you mean and I write "homosexual lifestyle" and we're supposed to go through the pretense that you don't understand what I mean by that? I may be time to again write of your genetic superiority to me. laugh.gif


The point that you fail to understand the semiotics behind the usage of "homosexual lifestyle" only highlights your lack of critical thought.

Linguistics is a branch of science that attempts to sort out how humans understand and use language and how we manipulate that usage to send out symbolic meaning to others. This guy is one of the tops at understanding linguistics and, as a result, is also one of the tops at understanding the world and how it works.

To clarify how linguisitcs works you may want to try some experiments:

-whenever your wife/girlfriend is in another room yell, "Come here, b*tch." Don't worry, she will understand exactly who you mean.


-If you are white (I can only assume this by other posts), whenever you pass an African-american on the street say, "yo, my brother(sister).What's goin down?" Yes, he or she will greatly appreciate your acknowledgement that we all come from the same common ancestor and will inform you of how their life is going. If you are black, a possibility since you are using the title of Richard Wright's novel as your pseudonym, then you may wish to say to every white person you pass, "Hey dude, what's shakin'? Have you ever been to a rally?" You, of course, would be referring to the Political Rally of Barack Obama, and there is no possibility that the white person would misundersand you.

-Ask every gay person you pass today on the street if they enjoy their "homosexual lifestyle." I am sure everyone will enjoy and admire your curiosity and well-wishes.


-whenever you buy something today say, "I want it now." This is only a simple request and people will be happy that you are clarifying your wishes.

Of course, linguistics is a branch of science. And I know that several people on this thread and others in the world like them have issues with science, so to be safe you may want to stay away from linguistics and crawl back into cave.



Bigby_M
5/27/08
7:16 AM
QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 27 2008, 06:30 AM) [snapback]393814[/snapback]


The point that you fail to understand the semiotics behind the usage of "homosexual lifestyle" only highlights your lack of critical thought.

Linguistics is a branch of science that attempts to sort out how humans understand and use language and how we manipulate that usage to send out symbolic meaning to others. This guy is one of the tops at understanding linguistics and, as a result, is also one of the tops at understanding the world and how it works.

To clarify how linguisitcs works you may want to try some experiments:

-whenever your wife/girlfriend is in another room yell, "Come here, b*tch." Don't worry, she will understand exactly who you mean.

-If you are white (I can only assume this by other posts), whenever you pass an African-american on the street say, "yo, my brother(sister).What's goin down?" Yes, he or she will greatly appreciate your acknowledgement that we all come from the same common ancestor and will inform you of how their life is going,

-whenever you buy something today say, "I want it now." This is only a simple request and people will be happy that you are clarifying your wishes.

Of course, linguistics is a branch of science. And I know that several people on this thread and others in the world like them have issues with science, so to be safe you may want to stay away from linguistics and crawl back into cave.



Excellent post on linguistics. Words have such subtle connotations, a slight change in words gives an entire different meaning.

For example Obama said he would "talk" with Iran. GWBush changed that to Obama would "negotiate" with Iran and then ran with it in a different direction then intended by Obama, implying treason. appeasement, and what not.

Those not paying attention were easily herded in the intended direction and acted on cue, responding exactly as presupposed, that is they piled on.

It was all based on a falsehood but those who rarely pay attention to detail didn't care.

It just felt so damned good to question Obama's patriotism at the presidents instigation. laugh.gif



And the poor dummies didn't even realize that they were being manipulated on purpose by W for political purposes.

(sigh)

dragonrider
5/27/08
7:23 AM
And just the same I am sure if I referred to heterosexuals as breeders and the breeder lifestyle no one would take offense.

then there is the prochoice/proabort those in favor of a womans right to choose would never say they are proabortion but to subtely change the slant one is able to dirty the other side while prochooice is so warm everyone is in favor of more choice in life right. Prolife/antiabortion how can anyone not be prolife. Partial birth abortion another linguistic mangling not found anywhere in medical lit but the words have such power to persuade. Infanticide is a new label being used for a doctors choice not to prolong the life of a terminal new born. Both sides have learned to use language so well that we are no longer talking to each other but sending loaded messages to our supporters.

2fat2ride
5/27/08
7:57 AM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 27 2008, 07:23 AM) [snapback]393818[/snapback]
And just the same I am sure if I referred to heterosexuals as breeders and the breeder lifestyle no one would take offense.


Offense? Heck, I want to buy a t-shirt. laugh.gif
QUOTE

Both sides have learned to use language so well that we are no longer talking to each other but sending loaded messages to our supporters.


Excellent observation. We would like to think that the continued debate over these issues is a search for truth. Perhaps it is not.

bigstew
5/27/08
11:11 PM
Still going.
SproutingUp
5/28/08
6:38 AM
QUOTE(tugrad @ May 26 2008, 10:25 PM) [snapback]393783[/snapback]

I am also wondering about the homosexual "lifestyle". My "lifestyle" sounds a lot like yours just add some parenting responsibilities. Pretty boring stuff. I've got to imagine that it bores the heck out of the folks who think we hold sex parties every weekend.

Hope you got out to enjoy the beautiful weekend.




We just went to a friend's house and had burgers/dogs. Nothing big. It was nice to have an extra day off though smile.gif



QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 27 2008, 12:21 AM) [snapback]393797[/snapback]


You can write "straight" and I know exactly what you mean and I write "homosexual lifestyle" and we're supposed to go through the pretense that you don't understand what I mean by that?. laugh.gif



What DO you mean by it? Seriously. I want to know exactly what this "homosexual lifestyle" you keep referring to is. I don't know of a "homosexual lifestyle". My lifestyle is no different from 99% of the lifestyles around here so I want to know exactly what it is you THINK homosexuals do that is so horrible.






QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 27 2008, 12:21 AM) [snapback]393797[/snapback]

Here's one I don't understand:

How does one know when children are "out"? biggrin.gif



That would be called a typo by the poster. It should have read "our", and anyone with any sense would have seen that. ....Maybe you were too hung up on a non-existant lifestyle to recognize a common typo.



QUOTE(bigstew @ May 27 2008, 11:11 PM) [snapback]394228[/snapback]
Still going.


still stupid

Bigmaclender2
5/28/08
9:03 AM
QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 28 2008, 06:38 AM) [snapback]394276[/snapback]




We just went to a friend's house and had burgers/dogs. Nothing big. It was nice to have an extra day off though smile.gif





What DO you mean by it? Seriously. I want to know exactly what this "homosexual lifestyle" you keep referring to is. I don't know of a "homosexual lifestyle". My lifestyle is no different from 99% of the lifestyles around here so I want to know exactly what it is you THINK homosexuals do that is so horrible.








That would be called a typo by the poster. It should have read "our", and anyone with any sense would have seen that. ....Maybe you were too hung up on a non-existant lifestyle to recognize a common typo.





still stupid





Not that I'm jumping in on the "gay" threads but I believe that they choose to use the word lifestyle to denote the fact that it is a choice. To me it feels like a dig, IMOO.

tugrad
5/28/08
9:53 PM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 27 2008, 12:21 AM) [snapback]393797[/snapback]


Here's one I don't understand:
How does one know when children are "out"? biggrin.gif

So sorry didn't realize that your reading comprehension is so limited that a one letter typo impacts your ability to understand an entire sentence. Or is it that picking on typos is all you can do to deflect attention from your bigotry?


QUOTE(2fat2ride @ May 27 2008, 06:30 AM) [snapback]393814[/snapback]

The point that you fail to understand the semiotics behind the usage of "homosexual lifestyle" only highlights your lack of critical thought.

Linguistics is a branch of science that attempts to sort out how humans understand and use language and how we manipulate that usage to send out symbolic meaning to others. This guy is one of the tops at understanding linguistics and, as a result, is also one of the tops at understanding the world and how it works.

To clarify how linguisitcs works you may want to try some experiments:

-whenever your wife/girlfriend is in another room yell, "Come here, b*tch." Don't worry, she will understand exactly who you mean.
-If you are white (I can only assume this by other posts), whenever you pass an African-american on the street say, "yo, my brother(sister).What's goin down?" Yes, he or she will greatly appreciate your acknowledgement that we all come from the same common ancestor and will inform you of how their life is going. If you are black, a possibility since you are using the title of Richard Wright's novel as your pseudonym, then you may wish to say to every white person you pass, "Hey dude, what's shakin'? Have you ever been to a rally?" You, of course, would be referring to the Political Rally of Barack Obama, and there is no possibility that the white person would misundersand you.

-Ask every gay person you pass today on the street if they enjoy their "homosexual lifestyle." I am sure everyone will enjoy and admire your curiosity and well-wishes.
-whenever you buy something today say, "I want it now." This is only a simple request and people will be happy that you are clarifying your wishes.

Of course, linguistics is a branch of science. And I know that several people on this thread and others in the world like them have issues with science, so to be safe you may want to stay away from linguistics and crawl back into cave.

I love this post! Thank you for making me laugh! laugh.gif

QUOTE(SproutingUp @ May 28 2008, 06:38 AM) [snapback]394276[/snapback]

We just went to a friend's house and had burgers/dogs. Nothing big. It was nice to have an extra day off though smile.gif

That would be called a typo by the poster. It should have read "our", and anyone with any sense would have seen that. ....Maybe you were too hung up on a non-existant lifestyle to recognize a common typo.


Thanks for getting my back. Sometimes the fingers just don't type the keys I tell them to.

I have a lot of extra days off! tongue.gif
SproutingUp
5/28/08
10:47 PM
Nativeson, I'm still waiting for you to tell me exactly what you presume this "homosexual lifestyle" to be. Seriously, describe it because whatever you may think it is, I have a feeling you are WAYYYY off base.

Our relationships are no more centered around sex and sex alone than any other relationship is. Sex is a small part of a relationship, any relationship that is meant to last anyway.

I would hazard to bet that my "lifestyle" isn't very different from your "lifestyle" at all. In fact, I'll even bet that YOUR lifestyle is more sinful and full of what would be considered abnormal sex than mine (abnormal meaning anything other than a man and a woman in missionary style only). Are you willing to make that bet?



What do you mean when you say "homosexual lifetlye"?

bigstew
5/28/08
10:52 PM
QUOTE
still stupid

Oooh. Snappy.
Nativeson
5/29/08
1:14 AM
QUOTE(tugrad @ May 28 2008, 09:53 PM) [snapback]394682[/snapback]

So sorry didn't realize that your reading comprehension is so limited that a one letter typo impacts your ability to understand an entire sentence. Or is it that picking on typos is all you can do to deflect attention from your bigotry?


Ohh, a little sensitive, are we? Unlike 2fat2ride I'll assume you know a "faux pah" when you see one and spare you the linguistics lesson, impressive and well written as it is. It must hurt but you did just prove Rush Limbaugh right with your inability to laugh at yourself (and your fellow liberals' mistakes). laugh.gif

My sex life: All you need to know for the sake of discussion is that it's consistant with my belief that practicing fornication, adultery, homesexuality and gluttony, etc. is missing the mark, which we all do. (I did sleep with a gay man once wink.gif ) I'll leave positions, etc. to your imagination because it's more exciting for you that way. I have zero curiousity about your intimate details. wink.gif Besides, mad.gif haven't you read my TB rants about the foolishness of gambling?

If living what I interpret as a Biblical lifestyle (there's that word again) rubs with your experience I ask that you respect my freedom to follow my beliefs. I've indirectly supported relief for many of your complaints of unfairness as gays and lesbians by voting to keep government out of as much as possible and private citizens in charge of their own lives. Since there's no such thing as a values vacumn my worldview does guide me as I vote as do all of yours except for Dragonrider.

Now for those who haven't heard let me go ahead for the upteenth time and draw attention to my "bigotry". When I use the term "homosexual lifestyle" I'm using what I consider to be a rather sterile clinical term as opposed to "queer" or "gay" or "lesbian". Any implied reference to promiscuity was unintended and I apologize to anyone who took it that way and will overlook the defensive retaliatory slams against my charactor.

Bigmac, you might accurately take the lifestyle part to mean I believe you make choices in life. Just because one is an alchoholic doesn't mean you're sentenced to life as a lush. I've come to believe we are born with the tendency to wander in many, many different ways and need an objective standard against which to judge our own behavior. I've been transparent about mine and I'm sorry it's offensive to you because I think highly of you based on the posts I've read.

Have a happy!



dragonrider
5/29/08
1:45 AM
[. Since there's no such thing as a values vacumn my worldview does guide me as I vote as do all of yours except for Dragonrider.



[/quote] Huh what How did I get in here. Where do you get the notion I don't vote my values. Becuase I am not a single issue voter?

I am confused please expound.

Bigmaclender2
5/29/08
9:17 AM
QUOTE(Nativeson @ May 29 2008, 01:14 AM) [snapback]394738[/snapback]


Ohh, a little sensitive, are we? Unlike 2fat2ride I'll assume you know a "faux pah" when you see one and spare you the linguistics lesson, impressive and well written as it is. It must hurt but you did just prove Rush Limbaugh right with your inability to laugh at yourself (and your fellow liberals' mistakes). laugh.gif

My sex life: All you need to know for the sake of discussion is that it's consistant with my belief that practicing fornication, adultery, homesexuality and gluttony, etc. is missing the mark, which we all do. (I did sleep with a gay man once wink.gif ) I'll leave positions, etc. to your imagination because it's more exciting for you that way. I have zero curiousity about your intimate details. wink.gif Besides, mad.gif haven't you read my TB rants about the foolishness of gambling?

If living what I interpret as a Biblical lifestyle (there's that word again) rubs with your experience I ask that you respect my freedom to follow my beliefs. I've indirectly supported relief for many of your complaints of unfairness as gays and lesbians by voting to keep government out of as much as possible and private citizens in charge of their own lives. Since there's no such thing as a values vacumn my worldview does guide me as I vote as do all of yours except for Dragonrider.

Now for those who haven't heard let me go ahead for the upteenth time and draw attention to my "bigotry". When I use the term "homosexual lifestyle" I'm using what I consider to be a rather sterile clinical term as opposed to "queer" or "gay" or "lesbian". Any implied reference to promiscuity was unintended and I apologize to anyone who took it that way and will overlook the defensive retaliatory slams against my charactor.

Bigmac, you might accurately take the lifestyle part to mean I believe you make choices in life. Just because one is an alchoholic doesn't mean you're sentenced to life as a lush. I've come to believe we are born with the tendency to wander in many, many different ways and need an objective standard against which to judge our own behavior. I've been transparent about mine and I'm sorry it's offensive to you because I think highly of you based on the posts I've read.

Have a happy!







I do apologize, Nativeson. I'm not individually offended by that statement as I am sure beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was born gay at birth even if scientists don't want to waste the money on research as it's not an overall blue collar man's issue. I know it to be a fact. Anyways, about the alcohol thing- I understand that as I am one. (not practicing as much these days, lol) I think that's why I really don't get along with a lot of gay people. I don't think like a gay person. Before anyone gay starts in on me-if you know my situation you will understand what I mean. It has nothing to do with gays but it has everything to do with the way that I was born. (In the wrong body).

View Topic | Comment on this blog