Hurting

May 7th, 2008 1:31 pm · 10 comments

Or, why I’m not buying the line that the drawn-out Democratic Primary is good news indeed! for the GOP:

Shellshocked House Republicans got warnings from leaders past and present Tuesday: Your party’s message isn’t good enough to prevent disaster in November, and neither is the NRCC’s money.

The double shot of bad news had one veteran Republican House member worrying aloud that the party’s electoral woes — brought into sharp focus by Woody Jenkins’ loss to Don Cazayoux in Louisiana on Saturday — have the House Republican Conference splitting apart in “everybody for himself” mode.

This involves the National Republican Congressional Committee chairman Tom Cole telling state House members that “the NRCC doesn’t have enough cash to ’save them’ in November if they don’t raise enough money or run strong campaigns themselves.”

But it also involves Newt’s piece in Human Events, itself interesting enough:

The Republican brand has been so badly damaged that if Republicans try to run an anti-Obama, anti-Rev. Wright or, if Sen. Clinton wins, anti-Clinton campaign, they are simply going to fail,” Gingrich said. “This model has already been tested with disastrous results.”

In 2006, there were six incumbent Republican Senators who had plenty of money, the advantage of incumbency, and traditionally successful consultants.

But the voters in all six states had adopted a simple position: “Not you.” No matter what the GOP Senators attacked their opponents with, the voters shrugged off the attacks and returned to, “Not you.”

The danger for House and Senate Republicans in 2008 is that the voters will say, “Not the Republicans.”

Yes, but.

Look, the “anti-Obama, anti-Rev. Wright” approach has been so successful for so long for the GOP - can they really shift gears, and run a different kind of campaign? I mean, if I’m a Republican, and it’s been all-Wright for the past two weeks and even with the Limbaugh “stealth” voters Hillary barely squeaks by in Indiana - I’m not real confident that Wright is going to continue to count for much, or for anything, come November. But you know they’re going to bang that gong, regardless of how little sound and fury it generates.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  10 comments  Tags: Republican Party

There are currently 10 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
dragonrider
5/7/08
1:45 PM
When is Hillary going to finally admit defeat, if she couldn't close the deal( her words) after these last two weeks then she should give up.
gsmart
5/7/08
2:27 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 7 2008, 01:45 PM) [snapback]386653[/snapback]
When is Hillary going to finally admit defeat, if she couldn't close the deal( her words) after these last two weeks then she should give up.




She's never going to admit defeat. Just said she's staying in the race.

ace1969
5/7/08
2:31 PM
Good, keep on fighting there Hill. Not because I like either one of them. I just like watching them beat each other up.....

johnq
5/7/08
2:32 PM
Hilary is an outstanding politician. I'm sure she believes she can broker a deal at the Convention.
dc
5/7/08
2:33 PM
QUOTE(ace1969 @ May 7 2008, 02:31 PM) [snapback]386678[/snapback]
Good, keep on fighting there Hill. Not because I like either one of them. I just like watching them beat each other up.....
Pass the popcorn........
ace1969
5/7/08
2:42 PM
John, I honestly believe that is a true assumption. What I find curious is what the fight will look like between "Dem" and McCain. I found it very interesting when the CNN poll said, among Democrats, ~40% would vote for McCain if their preferred person did not win the nomination.

Pericles
5/7/08
3:08 PM
QUOTE(dragonrider @ May 7 2008, 01:45 PM) [snapback]386653[/snapback]
When is Hillary going to finally admit defeat, if she couldn't close the deal( her words) after these last two weeks then she should give up.


How about every vote counting? Isn't that a Democratic principle? End the race now and disenfranchise minority voters in Florida and Michigan? My God. Is this the Democrat party that we all know and love? laugh.gif


QUOTE(gsmart @ May 7 2008, 02:27 PM) [snapback]386677[/snapback]

She's never going to admit defeat. Just said she's staying in the race.


Ron Paul is still in the race too. You don't see us Republicans complaining.
gsmart
5/7/08
3:30 PM
QUOTE(Pericles @ May 7 2008, 03:08 PM) [snapback]386699[/snapback]


How about every vote counting? Isn't that a Democratic principle? End the race now and disenfranchise minority voters in Florida and Michigan? My God. Is this the Democrat party that we all know and love? laugh.gif




Ron Paul is still in the race too. You don't see us Republicans complaining.




Ah, but I did see Ron Paul - really, anybody but McCain - getting a large share of the vote in both Indiana and North Carolina yesterday. Via Drudge:



26 percent of GOP voters in N.C. vote against McCain (for Paul or even Huckabee)

23 percent of GOP voters in Indiana vote against McCain.

cyberscribbler
5/7/08
3:31 PM
QUOTE(Pericles @ May 7 2008, 03:08 PM) [snapback]386699[/snapback]
How about every vote counting? Isn't that a Democratic principle? End the race now and disenfranchise minority voters in Florida and Michigan?
Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan. Therein lies the difference. He plays by the rules of the party.

QUOTE
Ron Paul is still in the race too. You don't see us Republicans complaining.
No, just the libertarian wing of the party. Besides McCain's won the nomination
Pericles
5/7/08
3:46 PM
QUOTE(gsmart @ May 7 2008, 03:30 PM) [snapback]386705[/snapback]


Ah, but I did see Ron Paul - really, anybody but McCain - getting a large share of the vote in both Indiana and North Carolina yesterday. Via Drudge:

26 percent of GOP voters in N.C. vote against McCain (for Paul or even Huckabee)

23 percent of GOP voters in Indiana vote against McCain.



That's right. But we know who the Republican nominee will be, just as you know who the Democrat nominee will be. And what are you saying Gil? You vowed to vote for McCain if Clinton steals the nomination from Obama.

Unfortunately, you guys have a Clinton running. I think she's a Democrat. A Clinton who has long been admired, but is now hated by the left wing of the party.


QUOTE(cyberscribbler @ May 7 2008, 03:31 PM) [snapback]386706[/snapback]
Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan. Therein lies the difference. He plays by the rules of the party.


How about Florida?

And if it were the other way around, are you saying that Sharpton and Co. wouldn't be conducting a Day of Outrage?

QUOTE(cyberscribbler @ May 7 2008, 03:31 PM) [snapback]386706[/snapback]
Obama wasn't on the ballot in Michigan. Therein lies the difference. He plays by the rules of the party.


Damn the rules. Every vote must be counted. Remember the Alamo. No Remember Florida in 2000.
View Topic | Comment on this blog