McCain’s pilfered speech
March 27th, 2008 4:33 pm · 7 comments
Hm. So John McCain gives a speech in which he bemoans the “million tragedies” inherent in war. ThinkProgress notes that his words, though, sounded a little familiar…
These lines are not McCain’s own. As TP reader 5th Estate discovered, they were in fact taken largely from a 1996 speech by ret. Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer. Below is a comparison of McCain’s address yesterday with Ziemer’s in 1996:
| Ziemer |
McCain |
| War is awful and when nations seek to resolve their differences by fighting, a million tragedies ensue. [Link] |
When nations seek to resolve their differences by force of arms, a million tragedies ensue. [Link] |
| War is wretched beyond description. [Link] |
It might not be the worst thing to befall human beings, but it is wretched beyond all description. [Link] |
| Nothing, not the valor with which it is fought, nor the cause with which it serves can glorify war. [Link] |
Not the valor with which it is fought nor the nobility of the cause it serves, can glorify war. [Link] |
Nowhere in yesterday’s speech does McCain give credit to Ziemer.
Well, I suppose great minds think alike. Or something like that.
Update: Curiouser and curiouser. HuffPo reports McCain actually plagiarized himself, from 2001. And Ziemer, it seems, may himself have plagiarized McCain. Great minds indeed.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: John McCain
There are currently 7 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this blogdragonrider 3/27/08 5:08 PM | QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Mar 27 2008, 04:35 PM) [snapback]371081[/snapback]
Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
so will this reach the level of the Obama plagarism or will the conservative press ignore this as usual for the conservative press.
|
Artie See 3/27/08 10:07 PM | The speechwriter who did this should be fired. They made their candidate look bad. |
Pericles 3/28/08 9:27 AM | QUOTE(dragonrider @ Mar 27 2008, 05:08 PM) [snapback]371091[/snapback]
so will this reach the level of the Obama plagarism or will the conservative press ignore this as usual for the conservative press.
Even the liberal press will ignore this non story, because it's .... a non story.
|
dragonrider 3/28/08 10:07 AM | You mean when Barrack uses words from some one on his campaign staff its big news but when MC steals words from someone totally unrelated to him its no big deal typical of conservative press coverage. |
Pericles 3/28/08 10:27 AM | QUOTE(dragonrider @ Mar 28 2008, 10:07 AM) [snapback]371362[/snapback] You mean when Barrack uses words from some one on his campaign staff its big news but when MC steals words from someone totally unrelated to him its no big deal typical of conservative press coverage. At least get your facts straight. Hillary Clinton raised the issue of Obama and plagiarism. How is that the fault of the conservative press? Give me a break.
|
dragonrider 3/28/08 12:03 PM | The conservative press chooses what makes the news everyday. They chose to make Hillary's plagarism charges big news. They are choosing to ignore McCains plagarism and his support of a right wing bigoted nut job minister Hagee. |
ArtVandolay 3/28/08 3:41 PM | QUOTE(dragonrider @ Mar 28 2008, 12:03 PM) [snapback]371477[/snapback] The conservative press chooses what makes the news everyday. They chose to make Hillary's plagarism charges big news. They are choosing to ignore McCains plagarism and his support of a right wing bigoted nut job minister Hagee.
Gil and Co. Nice try: Think Progress retracts McCain plagiarism charge.
Again the libs discharge prematurely. How stupid can they look??
http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalde...ism_charge.html
|
View Topic | Comment on this blog