Lessons learned

March 12th, 2008 4:54 pm · 6 comments

Glenn Greenwald is riffing on the Spitzer thing, and while I’m generally a huge fan of Greenwald’s, I think the likes of Spitzer really should be kicked to the curb - not because of the “immorality” of what he did, but because here is an official specifically tasked with rooting out wrongdoing and corruption, and really getting on his high horse about it, spending some 80 grand on hoookers - which is, you know, illegal.

If Democrats are credibly going to be the party of change, credibly stand against corruption - then those who don’t toe that line have to go. Because if we tolerate this - what else do we tolerate?

But in any event, I did enjoy Greenwald’s list of things he’s learned over the past 48 hours, regarding the scandal - several of which seem to apply, in spades, to Lancaster County:

Sometimes, adults make choices for their own lives that other adults perceive to be bad choices. When that happens, the adults who know better have the right to step in, pass laws to restrict the bad choices, and even make the bad choices criminal — all for the good of the adults who don’t know what’s good for them.

* People who respect the judgments which adult women make about their own lives and believe in their right to choose for themselves how they live are sexist and even misogynistic. People who believe that adult women don’t really know what’s good for them and need to have choices made for them by others are the people who respect women.

<snip>

* Governors who hire adult prostitutes must resign immediately lest the public trust be forever sullied. Presidents who break the law by spying on Americans with no warrants, who torture people in violation of multiple treaties and statutes, who start hideously destructive wars based on false pretenses, who repeatedly proclaim the power to ignore laws, and who imprison people — including Americans — with no charges of any kind, should remain in office for as long as they want. Anyone who suggests otherwise is an irresponsible, shrill, partisan radical.

I think we have letters to the editor saying basically the same thing every week.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  6 comments  Tags: Sex Scandal

There are currently 6 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
Pericles
3/13/08
8:00 AM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Mar 12 2008, 04:55 PM) [snapback]365576[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.


"Presidents who break the law by spying on Americans with no warrants, who torture people in violation of multiple treaties and statutes, who start hideously destructive wars based on false pretenses, who repeatedly proclaim the power to ignore laws, and who imprison people — including Americans — with no charges of any kind, should remain in office for as long as they want. Anyone who suggests otherwise is an irresponsible, shrill, partisan radical."

Can we stop dragging out this corpse and stick to the facts as they are presented?

What kind of journalism is this when every infraction is compared to the evils of the Bush Administration?

It's lazy and it's cheap, but it's so very typical.

I refrain from invoking Bill Clinton whenever a conservative is embroiled in some scandal. It's intellectually dishonest and just plain stupid.

Why is it Gil, that a person with your mastery of the written word, and your obvious intellect, is so quick to cheapen the discussion with this level of stupidity?


Daisy Lee Myers
3/13/08
9:06 AM
like my WALL STREET FRIEND TOLD ME..

SPITZER HAS BEEN USING CALL GIRLS FOR TEN YEARS.

why is BUSH AND CO after him today and not years ago?

they wanted SPITZER to be silenced.

why????

and why today?
grieker
3/13/08
9:34 AM
QUOTE(Daisy Lee Myers @ Mar 13 2008, 09:06 AM) [snapback]365763[/snapback]
like my WALL STREET FRIEND TOLD ME..

SPITZER HAS BEEN USING CALL GIRLS FOR TEN YEARS.

why is BUSH AND CO after him today and not years ago?

they wanted SPITZER to be silenced.

why????

and why today?


Daisy, you forgot your sarcasm tag.

Daisy Lee Myers
3/13/08
9:50 AM
lol..


harv1:

read this...


What Prompted Spitzer Investigation?


http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/182700.php
Typhon
3/13/08
3:13 PM
QUOTE(Pericles @ Mar 13 2008, 08:00 AM) [snapback]365741[/snapback]


"Presidents who break the law by spying on Americans with no warrants, who torture people in violation of multiple treaties and statutes, who start hideously destructive wars based on false pretenses, who repeatedly proclaim the power to ignore laws, and who imprison people — including Americans — with no charges of any kind, should remain in office for as long as they want. Anyone who suggests otherwise is an irresponsible, shrill, partisan radical."

Can we stop dragging out this corpse and stick to the facts as they are presented?

What kind of journalism is this when every infraction is compared to the evils of the Bush Administration?

It's lazy and it's cheap, but it's so very typical.

I refrain from invoking Bill Clinton whenever a conservative is embroiled in some scandal. It's intellectually dishonest and just plain stupid.

Why is it Gil, that a person with your mastery of the written word, and your obvious intellect, is so quick to cheapen the discussion with this level of stupidity?






A republican lawmaker threatened to IMPEACH Spitzer if he did not resign.

He visited a prostitute. Bush has damaged our country in every way imaginable, yet they won't seek impeachment. The outcry from the public has been for impeachment of bush/cheney, yet no impeachment.

So, until bush/cheney are held accountable, the republican party has no right to suggest ANYONE be censured or impeached or even get a slap on the wrist with serious cases of TREASON, High Crimes and misdemeanors against the bush/cheney regime. There is nothing dishonest or stupid about wanting these war criminals brought to justice.

Pericles
3/13/08
3:34 PM
QUOTE(Typhon @ Mar 13 2008, 03:13 PM) [snapback]366036[/snapback]


He visited a prostitute. Bush has damaged our country in every way imaginable, yet they won't seek impeachment. The outcry from the public has been for impeachment of bush/cheney, yet no impeachment.

So, until bush/cheney are held accountable, the republican party has no right to suggest ANYONE be censured or impeached or even get a slap on the wrist with serious cases of TREASON, High Crimes and misdemeanors against the bush/cheney regime. There is nothing dishonest or stupid about wanting these war criminals brought to justice.



How do you expect your point of view to be taken seriously if all you do is rant, rave, and shill?

If there truly was a public outcry for impeachment, Bush would already have been impeached. But since it's just coming from the Code Pink wing of the Democratic party there has been no impeachment.

But we'll have to take your word for it. Since you're so darn committed, you must be correct.

If any politician commits any crime, like rape, mass-murder, child molestation, etc... no Repubican will be allowed to say a word about them leaving office.

Fair is fair. Thanks for setting us all straight.

You have a bright future, indeed.
View Topic | Comment on this blog