Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.

And people wonder what's wrong with our society today.....Where did this woman come from??? You have got to be kidding me, right??? LMAO

I'd be laughing, except it's so sad.
Some teachings are so ingrained, some folks believe them without a second thought, and they never learn to think for themselves.

this is the kind of person heaven will be populated with so enjoy yourselves while you can.LOL

they'll have a big surprise waiting for them!!!

You can catch toe cancer from teh geys?

Gil, some of this audio is far fetched, however a "good" journalist would refute some of what she had to say with the correct facts.

Why don't you come up with some stats proving that gay people, especially gay men have the same life expectancy as heterosexual men?

Or that the suicidal rate in gay young people is the same as their heterosexual peers.

Or that schools aren't teaching kids about gay families, such as "Heather has Two Mommies" or "The King and King".

Why don't you take a stab at it and prove the woman wrong?

(of course you won't, because you can't)



Actually that isn't what she said.She was likening the advancing of the gay agenda as a cancer on society and what she did say was……
"When you got cancer on your little toe, do you say, 'I am going to forget about it, because the rest of me is fine.

I find it totally offensive to say that I am a toe cancer on society that needs to be amputated and killed for the good of society.

Hello Goldilocks,

I'm curious.

Can you, without any reference to any religous reasons, give factual evidence that gays should not have the same rights as anyone else.

I am a Christian and I cherish my Christianity. But my Christianity doesn't demonize gays. I guess we are from different denominations. My study of Christianity has shown me that the hatred of gays come from what man has added, not from what God has ordained. So, lets leave religon out completely.

Why should gays not have the same legal rights as heterosexuals? Why should they be discriminated against?

God does not ordain hatred of anyone and true Christianity doesn't demonize or condone hatred either. Christianity believes that all people deserve to be treated with kindness and respect. However homosexual sex is viewed as a sin, same as adultery or fornication. However, just because one views those acts as sin doesn't mean they hate that person. Hubby and I have an in-law who commits adultery, by living with his girlfriend. He brings her to family gatherings and we have a friendly congenial relationship. I wouldn't dream of hating her or treating her unkindly, because I believe they engage in what I would consider sinful behavior. In fact we never even talk about it, even though she knows where we stand.

The problem is that many gay people view any disagreement with the gay lifestyle as hatred and that is so far from the truth. For those who disagree, it is simply a difference of opinion, not hatred. If gay people were secure in their positions, they wouldn't feel threatened by dissent.

If you are referring to gay marriage, marriage isn't a legal right; it is privilege that should meet a criterion, that criteria being defined as between one man and one woman. I do believe that gay people should be granted civil unions with all the perks of marriage.

I asked, rather politely and coherently to give reason for the discrimination of gays without using religon as a factor. You have given a totally religous based response.

I will ask again, as perhaps it wasn't clear.

Can you give any reason, OTHER THAN RELGIOUS BELIEF, why gays should be discriminated against or not have equal rights with everyone else?

Thank you for taking the time to understand the question and offer a viable response.


That criteria does not exist. That is the reason so many fundamentalists are trying to get ammendments to the constitution or new laws written saying it is one man and one woman. It is not stipulated anywhere that it is defined as such other than through religous dogma.

Now, without the use of religous belief, please give good reason to deny the "privelege" of marriage to gays while granting it to heterosexual when there is no legal reason for doing so that isn't religously based.

Thank you for sticking to the question and not reverting to your religous views in your upcoming answer.

The new push is for amendments that call not just for banning gay marriage but also civil unions or anything that resembles civil unions so again showing this is not just about saving marriage but about keeping some people as second class citizens.

But please lets not just limit this thread to marriage. Gay = toe cancer is a call to remove gay people and gay culture from society. One surgically removes cancer she chose that analogy with purpose she believes that gay people should be invisible in schools and in society and if that by necessity involves surgical removal ( killing gays) so be it.

Because homosexuality is a choice. It is not genetically programmed no matter how many times you turn blue in the face.

You brought your religious views into the mix when you said in a previous post….

I am a Christian and I cherish my Christianity. But my Christianity doesn't demonize gays. I guess we are from different denominations. My study of Christianity has shown me that the hatred of gays come from what man has added, not from what God has ordained.

Than you asked me to keep mine out of the mix. Isn't that a bit presumptuous?

The new push is for amendments that call not just for banning gay marriage but also civil unions or anything that resembles civil unions so again showing this is not just about saving marriage but about keeping some people as second class citizens.

But please lets not just limit this thread to marriage. Gay = toe cancer is a call to remove gay people and gay culture from society. One surgically removes cancer she chose that analogy with purpose she believes that gay people should be invisible in schools and in society and if that by necessity involves surgical removal ( killing gays) so be it.

Because homosexuality is a choice. It is not genetically programmed no matter how many times you turn blue in the face.
So I suppose the homosexual agenda folks just ruined it for everyone else [[[who may be ]]]]living that way [[[in a homosexual lifestyle]]] but keeping their mouths shut and minding their own business. If the verbal ones had kept their mouths shut, then life would not have toughened up for people who make that homosexual choice perhaps. I do not agree with civil unions... but rather joint property contracts for those who chose to live together for any reason. If there is a true lack of discrimination, then any single who choses to live with another single person for whatever reason, will have equal rights. Examples: There are times it would be good for young adults to enter into a joint property contract during college years... or when just starting a business life in a new city. No matter why they are adults living together, if the tax and property laws were equitable, then there should be less discrimination against folks. What we don't know should not lead us to get our noses dirty.

Wonderwoman et al who truly believe that sexuality is a choice: can you remember the day that you chose to be a heterosexual?

When I read someone saying that homosexuality is a choice, I always wonder if they are saying that because they themselves chose to lead a heterosexual life despite having homosexual tendencies, thoughts and desires. Something to ponder...

ok may I suggest the use of the ignore function. for those who are pro gay I would suggest ignoring wonderwoman and goldilocks, that way you can voice your opinions and not be reduced to posts that will result in being banned.



for wonderwoman and goldilocks no offense to you two, for I feel everyone is entitled to their own opinions whether right or wrong, but may I suggest using the ignore function on those posters who may seem similar to past posters with whom we have had conflicting opinions that have degraded into nonproductive discourse.



This sort of discussion gets us no where and causes undue stress to those involved. And we aren't typing anything that hasn't been typed before. save the electrons for more productive conversations. someone please be the bigger person.

Why do you think Gil keeps firing out the 'gay' articles at breakneck pace? It pushes everyone's buttons and its good for business

ok may I suggest the use of the ignore function. for those who are pro gay I would suggest ignoring wonderwoman and goldilocks, that way you can voice your opinions and not be reduced to posts that will result in being banned.



for wonderwoman and goldilocks no offense to you two, for I feel everyone is entitled to their own opinions whether right or wrong, but may I suggest using the ignore function on those posters who may seem similar to past posters with whom we have had conflicting opinions that have degraded into nonproductive discourse.



This sort of discussion gets us no where and causes undue stress to those involved. And we aren't typing anything that hasn't been typed before. save the electrons for more productive conversations. someone please be the bigger person.

Just let it go, and maybe the hydra will stop sprouting heads.

I hope no one thinks I am some head of a Hydra. If I have offended the sensibilities of some by the voiciferousness of my objection to those who are disgusted by my life they are my own thoughts not the pseudonym of some banned poster.

ok may I suggest the use of the ignore function. for those who are pro gay I would suggest ignoring wonderwoman and goldilocks, that way you can voice your opinions and not be reduced to posts that will result in being banned.

for wonderwoman and goldilocks no offense to you two, for I feel everyone is entitled to their own opinions whether right or wrong, but may I suggest using the ignore function on those posters who may seem similar to past posters with whom we have had conflicting opinions that have degraded into nonproductive discourse.

This sort of discussion gets us no where and causes undue stress to those involved. And we aren't typing anything that hasn't been typed before. save the electrons for more productive conversations. someone please be the bigger person.