Real American heroes

February 15th, 2008 10:26 am · 2 comments

So the FISA extension expires Saturday and House Democrats are about to let it, because they’re still fighting over whether the telecoms should get retroactive immunity for, you know, breaking the law when the government told them to. But as usual, we’re getting the usual hysterical mendacity from our friends on the right - such as Ted Poe, Republican of Texas, saying that:

“I think there is probably joy throughout the terrorist cells throughout the world that the United States Congress did not do its duty today.”

Yes - yes, the Islamo-fascists are overjoyed that we seem to be dillying on the idea of a police state.

Glenn Greenwald notes what I think is an important point in all of this, something that’s driven the debate for quite some time but never been explicity cited as such:

Outside of Andy McCarthy, Mark Steyn and their roving band of paranoid right-wing bloggers who can’t sleep at night because they think (and hope) that there are dark, primitive “jihadi” super-villains hiding under their beds — along with the Very Serious pundit class which proves their Seriousness by placing blind faith in the fear-mongering pronouncements and demands of our military and intelligence officials for more unchecked power — nobody cares about adolescent Terrorist game-playing like this any longer. In the real world, it doesn’t work, and it hasn’t worked for some time.

I think it probably works better than Greenwald imagines, or might were there to be another terrorist attack.

But the “hope” line gets me. Authoritarian conservatives will deny it, of course; but there’s been this sense from them for the past seven years that they see themselves as latter-day Winston Churchills, facing down the overwhelming menace from across the waters. Nevermind that Islamo-fascism can’t hold a candle to actual historical fascism in terms of the threat it actually poses; the point is that these conservatives imagine themselves living in extremely dangerous, and thus thrilling, times.

And they, of course, are the steadfast, rock-solid stars of this movie.

The heroes; American heroes, keeping America safe. Because Teh Dreaded Terrorists are everywhere, lurking under the bed, behind corners, in shadows across this nation. Only they, the real American heroes, understand the nature of this grave threat; only they are serious enough to grasp the stakes. Those of us who dicker with outdated ideas like privacy in this Age of Terror are fools - and endanger us all.

And they do hope for another attack - for it will “prove” them right, and show this shortsighted nation who was right all along.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  2 comments  Tags: Warrantless wiretapping · Authoritarianism · Terrorism

There are currently 2 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
Pericles
2/15/08
4:33 PM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Feb 15 2008, 10:30 AM) [snapback]357773[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.


It's unfair and innaccurate to say that conservatives want to see another terrorist attack to prove them correct. But it's quite conceivable that another terrorist attack would prove that you are wrong.

Of course, if you are wrong, my grandchildren may be the innocent victims. But you seem more than willing to accept that in exchange for your idealism that really has no factual basis of causing you actual Consitutional harm.

If we're not willing make some legitmate compromises here, then we should be prepared for the inevitable. I don't mind, but I simply cannot accept that my wife, children and grandchildren may be at greater risk because the far left is not willing to responsibly deal with the reality of terrorism.

Isn't that what adults do? Deal with reality.
usedmeat
2/16/08
1:22 PM
Gee, Bush's Policestate Act expires and what happens? Nothing, becuase the FISA laws in existance are adequate enough to monitor suspicious activity. If the law expireing was so important why is Bushco refusing to sign another extention of the existing law while Congress thrashes out the balance between the 4 th Amendment and security concers?
What this is all about is the Telcom Immunity clause and not really even that.
What happens is without immunity American citizens can sue the Telcos for breach of their civil liberties as provided by the Founding Fathers, but that isn't what Bush cares about. It's the fact that during the discovery phase of the trials the extent that Bush abused the Constitution will become evident and set republicans back years.
View Topic | Comment on this blog