Monopoly money
January 29th, 2008 5:08 pm · 2 comments
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s got a very interesting series going on Pennsylvania’s liquor control system - its benefits and (mostly) drawbacks. Among other things, it examines the strange way in which the LCB can decide where to locate a state store - helps, apparently, to be in with Gov. Ed.
And then there’s this:
Also this month, the PLCB reached preliminary agreement with Landor Associates of San Francisco, which has done work for BP, H&R Block and Federal Express, to redo the agency’s image, create a new logo and eventually look at redesigning stores. The two-year contract is for $3.7 million.
“I’m not crazy about the price,” said Sen. John Rafferty, R-Montgomery, chair of the Law and Justice Committee. But he added that he does see the benefits of a redesign as part of a complete system upgrade to attract more customers.
A Senate colleague, however, questioned the move.
“Why a public organization is spending significant dollars to polish the image of a public monopoly is beyond me. I don’t think there’s any rational argument for that,” said Sen. Rob Wonderling, a fellow Republican from Montgomery County.
Wonderling, the story notes, has a better idea: he’s “crafting a bill to privatize retail liquor sales in Pennsylvania, which he intends to introduce early next month.”
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: Alcohol · Pennsylvania
There are currently 2 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this blogArtVandolay 1/30/08 4:02 PM | QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Jan 29 2008, 04:10 PM) [snapback]352485[/snapback]
Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
It's an outrage that PA hired an agency from California to promote the State Stores. There has to be hundreds of agencies in PA that could have done the job. Naturally they put out a bid, but it should have been limited to state wide organizations.
Actually to invest that kind of money to attract new customers is even more of an outrage. You don't need to promote bozin' - people who want them will find the stores. Just the store front signs take care of that!
I guess someone figures that money would have not been put to good use elsewhere.
|
P. Floyd 1/30/08 4:15 PM | QUOTE(ArtVandolay @ Jan 30 2008, 04:02 PM) [snapback]352777[/snapback]
It's an outrage that PA hired an agency from California to promote the State Stores. There has to be hundreds of agencies in PA that could have done the job. Naturally they put out a bid, but it should have been limited to state wide organizations.
Actually to invest that kind of money to attract new customers is even more of an outrage. You don't need to promote bozin' - people who want them will find the stores. Just the store front signs take care of that!
I guess someone figures that money would have not been put to good use elsewhere.
even if promoting liquor sales does get more people to drink, is that a good thing?
bud, miller, coors, etc do it all the time. lately i've been seeing a lot of commercials for bacardi. BUT, i would like to think there is a difference though between promoting a brand, and promoting a store. oh, and by the way, its the only store you can shop at for a liquor.
|
View Topic | Comment on this blog