Constitution: Not up to God’s snuff?
January 15th, 2008 3:04 pm · 12 comments
I’ve written about how I’ve found it difficult to dislike Mike Huckabee as much as I probably should.
He appears to be going out of his way to make it easier:
The United States Constitution never uses the word “God” or makes mention of any religion, drawing its sole authority from “We the People.” However, Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee thinks it’s time to put an end to that.
“I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution,” Huckabee told a Michigan audience on Monday. “But I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living god. And that’s what we need to do — to amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than try to change God’s standards so it lines up with some contemporary view.”
That second graf, by the way, is an exact quote, you can watch the video at the link.
Huckabee’s obviously talking about his support of constitutional amendments to ban abortion and gay marriage. But what he’s saying essentially boils down to: The Constitution is flawed, it’s not Godly enough.
Tell me again about how these folks don’t want to turn this country into a theocracy?
This isn’t just pander-to-the-base stuff, this is actually dangerous. Huckabee may be unaware of it, but the Constitution isn’t some fad, hatched yesterday by a bunch of poll-driven pols. It was crafted more than 200 years ago and has stood the test of time; indeed, you can argue that the very reason this country has survived and thrived all of these years is specifically because of the Constitution.
But Huckabee is saying the Constitution isn’t good enough.
You know what? Whether or not it comports with what Huckabee thinks are God’s standards is immaterial. The constitution is good enough; and anyone who thinks the answer is More God in the Constitution isn’t going to save this country. Just the opposite.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: Huckabee · Religious conservatism · Wingers
There are currently 12 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this blogcharlie_crystle 1/15/08 10:53 PM | QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Jan 15 2008, 03:05 PM) [snapback]349041[/snapback]
Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.
well clearly the parties need to sponsor a prayer breakfast to properly think this through.
|
usedmeat 1/16/08 9:16 AM | Huxterbee is a republican so what did you expect? Remember this is a guy who's hatred of the Clintons ran so deep he engineered the release of a rapist convicted of attacking a distant relative of Bills. That this guy has gotten as far as he has in the primaries tells us all we need to know about the sicko republican party.
|
Bigmaclender2 1/16/08 10:04 AM | QUOTE(usedmeat @ Jan 16 2008, 10:16 AM) [snapback]349208[/snapback] Huxterbee is a republican so what did you expect? Remember this is a guy who's hatred of the Clintons ran so deep he engineered the release of a rapist convicted of attacking a distant relative of Bills. That this guy has gotten as far as he has in the primaries tells us all we need to know about the sicko republican party.
I wish more people thought like you.......
The problem is in the interpretation of this "Constitution". For instance.....And Justice for All.........Does that mean all except gays and abortioners? Since they are so quick to make reference to "The Holy Book" , haven't they read the verse, "Judge not lest ye be judged"????? It is that very same God that they are going to have to answer to when it comes time to answer......What will they have to say then?
|
mam0412 1/16/08 4:00 PM | I like Huckabee. But, I'd like him to be my minister and not my President. Now I'm not so sure I want him to be my minister! |
ace1969 1/16/08 4:21 PM | QUOTE(Bigmaclender2 @ Jan 16 2008, 11:04 AM) [snapback]349230[/snapback]
The problem is in the interpretation of this "Constitution". For instance.....And Justice for All.........Does that mean all except gays and abortioners? Since they are so quick to make reference to "The Holy Book" , haven't they read the verse, "Judge not lest ye be judged"????? It is that very same God that they are going to have to answer to when it comes time to answer......What will they have to say then?
Justice:
the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness: to uphold the justice of a cause.
[size="2"][/size]rightfulness or lawfulness, as of a claim or title; justness of ground or reason: to complain with justice.
the moral principle determining just conduct.
While I agree in being fair, the concept of justice is based on a moral standard. While we need to consider judgment towards people, the ideals do not tell us to accept wrong just to fulfill "justice".
Big difference
|
hahaha 1/16/08 8:30 PM | "Expel the wicked man from among you."
How can you do that if you don't judge them? |
justplainjoe 1/16/08 9:35 PM | QUOTE(hahaha @ Jan 16 2008, 09:30 PM) [snapback]349374[/snapback] "Expel the wicked man from among you."
How can you do that if you don't judge them?
because the wicked man is within.
|
hahaha 1/16/08 10:40 PM | In your case, yes it is. Now be gone with him!
Oh Dodge! He's Back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
philly54 1/17/08 1:24 AM | Very disappointed, he was climbing up fairly quick on my short list when it came to Rep.candidates . Oh well, another one bites the dust  |
justplainjoe 1/17/08 6:29 AM | QUOTE(hahaha @ Jan 16 2008, 11:40 PM) [snapback]349402[/snapback] In your case, yes it is. Now be gone with him!
Oh Dodge! He's Back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
but of course!!!!!
these things are foolishness unto the natural man because they must be spiritually discerned.
For my thoughts are not your thoughts , neither are your ways my ways . For as the heavens are higher than the earth , so are my ways higher than your ways , and my thoughts than your thoughts
|
Bigmaclender2 1/17/08 11:51 AM | QUOTE(ace1969 @ Jan 16 2008, 05:21 PM) [snapback]349332[/snapback]
Justice:
the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness: to uphold the justice of a cause.
[size="2"][/size]rightfulness or lawfulness, as of a claim or title; justness of ground or reason: to complain with justice.
the moral principle determining just conduct.
While I agree in being fair, the concept of justice is based on a moral standard. While we need to consider judgment towards people, the ideals do not tell us to accept wrong just to fulfill "justice".
Big difference
Whose definition of wrong?????
|
ace1969 1/17/08 1:50 PM | God's definition.
While I do not support unfair or discriminatory actions towards any people I cannot support abandoning moral principals. I considering it similar to the views of communism. Take from those who have - give to those who do not, just to ensure all are the same, regardless of effort. I feel that we are confusing justice and fairness with the idea that everyone is entitled to what everyone else has. I have friends who have leaps and bounds more "stuff" than I do. However, I do not feel entitled to it. Just as I have somethings that others do not and feel no obligation to hand it over to someone else.
Concept holds true here.
|
View Topic | Comment on this blog