Coulterkampf

October 3rd, 2007 12:09 pm · 6 comments

What’s that you say? Ann Coulter has a new book out? Really. And if Ann Coulter’s got a new book out, that means she’s hitting the interview circuit. And if she’s hitting the interview circuit, that means

If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president. It’s kind of a pipe dream, it’s a personal fantasy of mine, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.

One would note Ann Coulter is single, and votes. Though I doubt this is what she means by “stupidly.”

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  6 comments  Tags: Ann Coulter · Wingers

There are currently 6 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
cyberscribbler
10/3/07
12:44 PM
QUOTE(Coulter)
If we took away women's right to vote...
We could treat them like cattle. The Taliban approves rolleyes.gif
[attachmentid=1286]




justplainjoe
10/3/07
2:54 PM
yesterday on the today show she said she is a christian.

bwahahahhahahahhahahaha

good one.

nothing like her and jr boy sullying the name of jesus like that.

anne coulter a christian.

bwhahahhahahhahahahaa

stop it, yer killin' me.

bwahahhahhahahahahhahahahahhahahaha



cyberscribbler
10/3/07
3:55 PM
QUOTE(Coulter)
If we took away women’s right ... it’s a personal fantasy of mine
Anyone else get the impression she has a bondage fetish?

Whirlwind
10/3/07
4:37 PM
Coulterstruggle? I don't get it. Unless you were going for a cheap joke, which doesn't make much sense. Coulter is not the first to say this about women's right to vote.



Men are historically concerned with danger to the territory, while women have been more conscious of threats to the hearth. Different imperatives. Complimentary. Voting for leadership will of course be affected by this difference. Artificially pitting women against men, when both imperatives are not seen to be easily handled by the same candidate.

bigstew
10/3/07
5:49 PM
QUOTE(Whirlwind @ Oct 3 2007, 04:37 PM) [snapback]325931[/snapback]
Coulterstruggle? I don't get it. Unless you were going for a cheap joke, which doesn't make much sense. Coulter is not the first to say this about women's right to vote.



Men are historically concerned with danger to the territory, while women have been more conscious of threats to the hearth. Different imperatives. Complimentary. Voting for leadership will of course be affected by this difference. Artificially pitting women against men, when both imperatives are not seen to be easily handled by the same candidate.

Gil wasn't concerned about true meaning. Its his hypocritical way of cross-referencing "wingers" with nazis.
usedmeat
10/3/07
11:55 PM
If the tiny black cocktail dress fits ...
View Topic | Comment on this blog