Look who’s got the knife
July 10th, 2007 10:39 am · 7 comments
This one’s rich. On the front page of yesterday’s Lancaster New Era is a McClatchy-Tribune story about a looming battle over “fairness” in talk radio, the possible revival of the “Fairness Doctrine.”
“Fairness” in talk radio would, of course, muzzle conservatives like Limbaugh and Hannity, Savage and all of the other tinpot local yokels on the dial from one side of the country to another. It might require “alternate” views to get equal airtime, which would water down the vehemence. Which, of course, is what some people want.
And so liberals are probably in favor of this; me, not so much. Because really, let conservatives have their radio enclave; conservative talk has proven to be profitable for the stations and networks involved, so let’s not have the government tell them how to run their businesses. If liberal talk radio were profitable it would be on the air; it isn’t, so it isn’t. And I’m really not concerned about how “slanted” talk radio is; one day the Internet is going to be comparably “slanted” to the left, that’s already in process. I’m sure conservatives will whine about that when the day comes. (It will be the same type of thing I get here at the newspaper - “The Sunday News should hire a conservative columnist and be more ‘fair and balanced.’ “)
In any event, the funny thing about this effort is the timing - now, after the immigration bills were specifically sent to their deaths by the insistence and persistence of conservative talk radio. And while Democrats have jumped on this bandwagon, let’s be realistic: If we get any legislative attempt to regulate conservative talk radio, it will be because Republicans want it; because Republicans wanted the immigration reform that talk radio helped kill.
The Republican Party now realizes that the conservative movement they have nurtured and used poses a threat to aspects of their legislative agenda. They’ll be smart about this - despite the fact that it was Mississippi Republican Trent Lott complaining that “talk radio is running America,” my guess is the GOP will permit Democrats to carry the “fairness” ball down the field and get out in front of the issue with all their liberal sanctimony. But all the while the Republican establishment will provide plenty of behind-the-scenes backing to “balance out” those loudmouth Limbaughs and render them impotent next time they want to get an immigration bill, or some similar economic measure that will benefit the economic elite but not the average talk-radio listener, through Congress.
Pretty amusing. Conservatives are always whining about how they’re being stabbed in the back. Turns out in this case it’s other conservatives who are doing the stabbing.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: Talk radio · Immigration · Conservatism
There are currently 7 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this bloghahaha 7/10/07 11:47 AM | Liberals must know the pain in the back feeling pretty well. Nancy and company did a great job in listening to their anti-war stance and riding in to victory on election day to only turn around and do some of their own stabbing.
Maybe the two groups should get together, find some common ground, find some good candidates and do some stabbing back! |
bigstew 7/10/07 12:14 PM | Well, I haven't been to the abyss in a while.
Gil, YOU SUKK! |
justplainjoe 7/10/07 12:24 PM | QUOTE(bigstew @ Jul 10 2007, 12:14 PM) [snapback]303223[/snapback] Well, I haven't been to the abyss in a while.
Gil, YOU SUKK!
are you in favor of the fairness doctrine applying to hate radio??
|
bigstew 7/10/07 12:29 PM | I am not in support of regulating any media. And why do you call it hate radio? Is it because you hate it?
Gil, where is my trip to the deep?
|
Subsonix 7/10/07 12:37 PM | You got it all mixed up Gil. The republicans haven't done anything for the conservatives, it's the other way around. The reason R's dominated the presidency, the senate and the house a while back was because conservatives put them there to do something. After the R's betrayed the conservatives, they started losing their majority.
Liberal politicians told us little people that we didn't know what was in the bill so we shouldn't oppose it. At the same time, they tried desperately to keep it a secret, to cease debate on it and pass it while we weren't looking. If liberals would have rather killed the bill than expose it to the light of day, the rest of us can guess that it probably wasn't something we would have wanted.
Is this the "accountability and transparency" we can expect from "the most ethical senate ever" Gil? What a JOKE.
|
ArtVandolay 7/11/07 4:57 PM | QUOTE(justplainjoe @ Jul 10 2007, 12:24 PM) [snapback]303225[/snapback]
are you in favor of the fairness doctrine applying to hate radio??
I keep telling you to listen to Air America. Get it on line or by Satelite. There are various degrees of hate being spewed, Depending on the annouoncer. Want hate and lies? Check Randi Roades in the afternoon. She should be on right now. an example of her lies is when Imus got the boot she went into a diatrube about how not one of the Women's NCAA tourney was broadcast on TV. Not true of course. They were.
Gil - The net does not belong to the left, the far rightees are going gangbusters online as well.
|
Magnus 7/11/07 5:45 PM | QUOTE(justplainjoe @ Jul 10 2007, 12:24 PM) [snapback]303225[/snapback] are you in favor of the fairness doctrine applying to hate radio?? As opposed to what? Regulating love radio?
|
View Topic | Comment on this blog