al-Qaeda, civilians - what’s the diff?

June 28th, 2007 10:15 am · 15 comments

Noting a BBC story that reports Iraqis are saying the 17 dead “al Qaeda” we offed in a June 22 attack were actually civilians, Atrios nails it:

What’s the truth? Who knows. But the bigger point is that US military has no idea if these guys were “al Qaeda,” or, more specifically, “al Qaeda in Iraq,” which isn’t really “al Qaeda” in the sense of being “the bad guys who attacked on 9/11.” They may have thought they were “bad guys,” and they may in fact have been “bad guys,” but most likely all they know is that they’re dead Iraqis and we have a stenographic press.

When you’re playing all sides in multiple civil wars the bad guys are anyone you point a gun at.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  15 comments  Tags: War on terror · War in Iraq

There are currently 15 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
usedmeat
6/28/07
10:49 AM
The short circuited logic of republicans. Bush lets the guy responsible for 911 and his followers off the hook so he can attack a country that had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism and his followers cheer him on. Then he starts describing Iraqi fighters as al Qaeda, the very people he let walk, and they don't raise an eyebrow?
bigstew
6/28/07
4:36 PM
Same old lefty witless rant. Impossible for alquaeda to be anywhere except afghanistan. Not yemen, sudan, new york, indonesia, phillipines, .............................................................
usedmeat
6/28/07
11:22 PM
You have Sunni Muslem extremists, Shia Muslim extremists, and terrorists calling themselves al Qaeda although they aren't. Now, all of a sudden they are all al Qaeda terrorists?

Meanwhile the guy behind 911 and his top lieutenants are laughing at our prediciment from their airconditioned caves along the Afghanistan Pakistan border. Yes it's possible for al Qaeda terrorists to be in New york, thanks to Bush not implementing any of the 911 commission's recomendations because they would eat into his tax cuts for his cronies.

The only lackwit on this forum is you. rolleyes.gif

hahaha
6/29/07
8:25 AM
QUOTE
attack a country that had absolutely nothing to do with terrorism

Talk about living in a world with blinders on! That is one absolutely clueless comment.
Pericles
6/29/07
8:49 AM
QUOTE(usedmeat @ Jun 28 2007, 11:22 PM) [snapback]300622[/snapback]
Bush not implementing any of the 911 commission's recomendations because they would eat into his tax cuts for his cronies.



You mean diversity training for first responders?

How about sealing the border? That would be a good start. Somehow, I suspect you'd be opposed.

And before you bring out the old, tired carnard.... Inspect every container!
usedmeat
6/29/07
11:50 AM
QUOTE(hahaha @ Jun 29 2007, 08:25 AM) [snapback]300682[/snapback]

Talk about living in a world with blinders on! That is one absolutely clueless comment.


OK where is your proof?

justplainjoe
6/29/07
11:59 AM
QUOTE(usedmeat @ Jun 29 2007, 11:50 AM) [snapback]300754[/snapback]


OK where is your proof?



the proof is that preznit bush sez he is a christian and christians don't lie therefore preznit bush wasn't making monkies out of those who believed him when he told all those lies that weren't really lies.

besides christians don't kill either unless someone doublecrossed their pappy after he doublecrossed them.

then it's okay.

oh and if they have all kinds of oil that yer pals want to steal then that's okay too.

besides they are all going to hell anyway whether al queada or not since they don't accept jesus.
ask any honest christian and the will tell you all moslems will go to hell so why would a christian preznit care if he killed a few hunnert thousand of 'em???
hahaha
6/29/07
12:27 PM
You are kidding me? There was no proof that Saddam was paying families after a family member blew themselves up? There was no proof of finding schools and factories loaded with bomb vests? Do you ONLY read left wing websites?
justplainjoe
6/29/07
1:15 PM
QUOTE(hahaha @ Jun 29 2007, 12:27 PM) [snapback]300776[/snapback]
You are kidding me? There was no proof that Saddam was paying families after a family member blew themselves up? There was no proof of finding schools and factories loaded with bomb vests? Do you ONLY read left wing websites?




then whomever sold saddam the poison gas he used on his own people should be arrested right?

riiiight!!!

you are only fooling yerself ,son.

hahaha
6/29/07
2:47 PM
Just like Iran, they are using that nuke stuff for electricity.

Should people who sell guns also be responsible?

Keep grasping at straws Joe. Bummer is you will always pick the short one.
justplainjoe
6/29/07
4:19 PM
QUOTE(hahaha @ Jun 29 2007, 02:47 PM) [snapback]300835[/snapback]
Just like Iran, they are using that nuke stuff for electricity.

Should people who sell guns also be responsible?

Keep grasping at straws Joe. Bummer is you will always pick the short one.


yeah people who sell guns to those who would use them for criminal acts should be held accountable.

just like anyone who sells poison gas to a dictator should be held accountable.

i find it odd that you don't, but i guess that is what passes for being conservative these days.

sigh!!!

hahaha
6/30/07
12:03 AM
Darn, I must not be in the correct circle of conservatives. Do some of them have a crystal ball to see in to the future? Sell a gun to a person who has all the proper ID and clearances and you want them to be punished for following the rules. Magical and impressive. How do you do it?
cyberscribbler
6/30/07
12:17 AM
To follow the line of thinking,
We sold Saddam weapons, which he used against his own people.
He was hung for the only atrocity we didn't supply him the weapons for.

BTW paying palestinian families is NOT justification to invade a country.

Neither was posession of bomb vests.

Grasping at straws when the premise was WMDs & nukes.


rehash this subject to death.



usedmeat
6/30/07
1:58 AM
QUOTE
There was no proof of finding schools and factories loaded with bomb vests?
What web sites do you read? Those 50 bomb vests were found almost a month after the invasion in a school. Not exactly shools and factories loaded with bomb vests now is it?

Funny how Saddam got wacked before he could give the world the details of how we supplied him with the werewithal to manufacture and deliver poison gas and biological WMDs.

It was republicans that unleashed Saddam on the world.

bigstew
7/1/07
2:26 PM
By that logic, then I guess it was the dems who brought us hitler.
View Topic | Comment on this blog