You’re not a hero

May 15th, 2007 9:45 am · 11 comments

The threads regarding the horrific Manheim Township murder have taken a predictable tack. Basically, any time there’s a terrible crime, you get the same thing.

The gun guys say, “If only the victims had a gun.”

Look, as a liberal I’m supposed to hate guns and want all sorts of new restrictions on them, but I don’t. Frankly, I just don’t think you’re ever going to get the kind of restrictions that will prevent stolen guns from showing up on the street. You will wind up taking guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens. And particularly over the course of the past few years, during Our Leader’s assault on the Constitution, I am very, very wary about abrogating Constitutional rights in any way. (I’m turning Libertarian in my old age, but that’s another story for another day).

And as the Manheim Township murders show, those who really want to kill will use whatever means are at hand. You might slow the pace of gun crimes by banning guns, but you don’t still the pathology that ultimately lies behind such crimes.

And in any event, no matter how much the public as a whole might want stricter gun laws, you are simply not going to steamroll the National Rifle Association. Period. And so what we would get, if anything, would be tiny, incremental laws that nibble around the edges, but have no real effect.

But.

All of this said, the gun lovers tend to be a little off their rockers.

I know gun guys; have one in my family, in fact. I don’t begrudge them their right to own whatever they want (though I would point out that in the Ludwig murder case, it was dad’s fondness for firearms that ultimately provided the weapon for his son).

But this idea that they are just short of caped superheroes who, with their gun, could have Prevented These Gruesome Crimes is just ludicrious.

You’re in your bed and you hear a commotion downstairs. In that case, maybe you do have the chance to grab your gun, confront the intruder, stand up for Truth, Justice and the American Way.

You wake up and the intruder is already standing over you with a knife, or with his gun: You are screwed.

You can have an AK-47 under the bed, and it isn’t going to do you a whit of good. Same deal if you’re walking down the street and suddenly some bullets fly by - a drive-by. We’ve had a couple of those in Lancaster recently. What are the gun types going to do - pull out the gat and return fire in the middle of a city?

At heart, gun types are paranoid. It’s a dangerous world out there, they think, and having a gun makes them feel safer. More power to them - as I said, I believe that’s their right, and I wouldn’t take it away.

But please, spare us the tall tales of the heroism you surely would show if that attacker had broken into your house rather than the Haines house. Maybe you would have stopped the intruder. Or maybe the intruder would have made a mockery of your claims that guns ultimately make you safer.

You can’t know until it happens to you. And that’s the thing about gun types; they all secretly wish it would happen to them. They all secretly want the chance to show they’re heroes, to use their gun in a situation like this.

They’d be better off hoping they never get the chance.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  11 comments  Tags: Guns · crime

There are currently 11 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
Subsonix
5/15/07
3:02 PM
And predictably, the liberals offer an array of "what if" statements. There are situations where a gun could be useless, but there are also ones where a gun would be priceless. If my gun sits under the bed collecting dust what harm does it do? None at all. If I do find it useful though, it will do plenty of good.

You're right when you say waking up to a muzzle in the face is a hopeless situation, but it's also a preventable one. I don't know about your house, but it's impossible to make it inside let alone upto the second floor of mine without waking someone up. I've tried, others have tried, it can't be done. Having an alarm system or dog would make it even tougher. So when the bad guy makes it to the second floor and tries to kill me in my sleep, he's going to have to quietly break down a locked door to get to me. How likely is that?

If you're not a gun guy, how do you know what gun guys secretly wish without projecting your own thought process onto them? I don't want this to happen to me or anyone I know. I wouldn't want my family at risk so the NRA could have a success story to brag about, I just don't. Also, since PA doesn't have a castle doctrine law, there's a good chance I'd be tried for murder or at least sued in civil court for killing an invader (which I'd have to live with forever), and where's the glory in that, Gil?
BuffaloBill
5/15/07
3:15 PM
Are you from Leola? unsure.gif
Subsonix
5/15/07
3:19 PM
QUOTE(BuffaloBill @ May 15 2007, 03:15 PM) [snapback]288937[/snapback]
Are you from Leola? unsure.gif


No, are you?
BuffaloBill
5/15/07
3:29 PM
No, just checking. wink.gif

And if I was to come after someone, I wouldn't break down their locked door in the middle of the night. I'd enter in the unlocked time of the day, you know when it's nice outside and the windows and doors are unlocked and or open, through a garage, pop a screen, then sneak upstairs and hide out until the occupants were sleeping. Just sayin' ph34r.gif
Subsonix
5/15/07
3:33 PM
QUOTE(BuffaloBill @ May 15 2007, 03:29 PM) [snapback]288940[/snapback]
No, just checking. wink.gif

And if I was to come after someone, I wouldn't break down their locked door in the middle of the night. I'd enter in the unlocked time of the day, you know when it's nice outside and the windows and doors are unlocked and or open, through a garage, pop a screen, then sneak upstairs and hide out until the occupants were sleeping. Just sayin' ph34r.gif


Then you've got a pair, my friend.
BuffaloBill
5/15/07
4:33 PM
well if your gonna do it, it sure helps. observe the potential victims, notice patterns in their routine and utilize stealth, an inside job is usually the easiest to perpetrate, but thats all movie talk, I'm just making things up. Thanks for the interlude.
harv1
5/15/07
4:43 PM
Not only does our state have a castle doctrine, it's got a yard doctrine too. I was pretty amazed when I learned that... And yet, I've not heard of more than one incident where it was 'invoked' and in that incident, it was justified. Just sayin...
Subsonix
5/15/07
4:54 PM
QUOTE(harv1 @ May 15 2007, 04:43 PM) [snapback]288960[/snapback]
Not only does our state have a castle doctrine, it's got a yard doctrine too. I was pretty amazed when I learned that... And yet, I've not heard of more than one incident where it was 'invoked' and in that incident, it was justified. Just sayin...


I can't find any evidence that the law is on the books, only that a bill is being considered. Can you provide a link?
wonderwoman
5/15/07
5:14 PM
QUOTE
GILL SEMI-SMART WROTE:

And in any event, no matter how much the public as a whole might want stricter gun laws, you are simply not going to steamroll the National Rifle Association. Period. And so what we would get, if anything, would be tiny, incremental laws that nibble around the edges, but have no real effect.

This is congecture Gill.

QUOTE
GILL SEMI-SMART WROTE:

At heart, gun types are paranoid. It’s a dangerous world out there, they think, and having a gun makes them feel safer. More power to them - as I said, I believe that’s their right, and I wouldn’t take it away.

I have no diagnosis that includes paranoia, and I am a "gun person" and from a "gun person" family. I also do not feel safer because we have guns. We had guns when the world in the country felt safe. I feel unsafe these days because the world is nuts. Perhaps if you legally changed your name, Gill, to Semi-Smart, then "Semi-Smart Comments" would be an accurate title for your column.

littledutchboy
5/15/07
6:16 PM
QUOTE
[b]I am very, very wary about abrogating Constitutional rights in any way.
[/b]

[/size]

I think the people in Blossom Hill are not worried about Constitutional right.....except maybe thier right to bare arms Gil (not so smart) Smart



[size="3"]

Save-the-Land
5/15/07
7:04 PM
No Gil, what's predictable are liberals always pointing out that gun rights supporters use their freedom of speech to express the belief that gun ownership can help protect against the thugs of this world.



With the way things are going in Lancaster County, I might just buy a gun myself to legally protect my family and me.

View Topic | Comment on this blog