L-L football rankings - post Week 5

October 4th, 2009 12:06 pm · 12 comments

Halfway home … that was about the fastest first five weeks of an L-L League football season that I can recall in quite a while.

But here we are: Five down and five to go before the postseason gets kicked off. That’ll be here before you know it.

Time to trot out another top-5 for you … which I do for fun, by the way (if you haven’t heard that one before).

Had to do some thinking this week, what with Penn Manor going down to Reading and all three section races starting to take shape and whatnot.

While I have your attention: Thanks for the birthday wishes (the big 4-0!) and yes, the cold is about out of me, and I’m feeling a little more friskier as Week 6 approaches.

Rankings-wise, here’s what I came up with …

1 – Manheim Central (2-0 Section 2, 5-0 overall; last week – 1st) – Barons throttled Solanco 45-0 and kept on zooming right along, so they’ll stay atop my poll for yet another week. And why not? Superb start for Central, which survived that grueling three-week gauntlet with wins over Wilson, Lancaster Catholic and Cocalico, and now the Barons and hunkering in for a run at a repeat Section 2 championship. Tons to like here – on both sides of the ball and particularly in the trenches and special teams. Sensing a long run for these cats. UP NEXT: Friday at home vs. Ephrata (0-2, 0-5).

2 – Elco (2-0 Section 3, 5-0 overall; last week – 2nd) – Pound-for-pound the MVP of the league in the first half of the season, QB Arron Achey was up to his old tricks vs. Columbia, torching the Crimson Tide’s D for six TD passes in the Raiders’ 46-20 Week 5 win in Myerstown. Elco has now piled up a league-leading 222 points. The Raiders have been equally stingy on D with a league-leading plus-11 turnover ratio after forcing Columbia to turn the ball over seven times last Friday. Should get an even better feel for these guys this week: Big, big tester in Week 6. UP NEXT: Friday at Lampeter-Strasburg (1-1, 2-3).

3 – Lancaster Catholic (2-0 Section 3, 4-1 overall; last week – 4th) – Bumped the Crusaders up a spot after previously unbeaten Penn Manor fell to Reading and Catholic held off L-S at the wire, 14-13. Stop the presses – Kyle Smith actually threw two picks in the win over the Pioneers (his first two interceptions this season). But the Crusaders showed some moxie, got another big night on the ground from Jordan Stewart (128 yards), and Smith had a pair of TD tosses – giving him 13 this season – and Catholic remained tied atop Section 3 with Elco … which visits Catholic in Week 10 by the way. I’m just saying. UP NEXT: Friday at home vs. Pequea Valley (0-2, 1-4).

4 – Cocalico (1-1 Section 2, 4-1 overall; last week – 5th) – Eagles bounced back after the gut-wrencher 17-14 loss at Manheim Central with a 28-10 triumph over backyard rival Ephrata in Denver. That score might have been a tad closer than some people thought, but the Mountaineers, who dropped their 15th game in a row, forced a couple of turnovers and hung in there. Still, a win for Cocalico, which gouged out 300-plus rushing yards – 237 yards from FB Austin Hartman, who also had three TD runs. Still features No. 1 rushing attack and top-ranked O in the league. UP NEXT: Friday at Lebanon (2-0, 2-3).

5 – Manheim Township (2-0 Section 1, 4-1 overall; last week – not ranked) – Warm greetings and salutations to the Blue Streaks, who are making their first appearance in my poll this season. Glad I got to see Township on Friday, when the Streaks wiped out host Warwick 34-14 behind Brian Sourber, who rushed for 205 yards and four TD for Township, which won its third game in a row and remained tied atop the Section 1 pile with Wilson. Picked these guys to finish second in the section, and here they are, right in the race at the midway point. Keep an eye on Neffsville, won’t you. UP NEXT: Friday at Cedar Crest (0-2, 2-3).

HONORABLE MENTION: Conestoga Valley (2-0 Section 2, 4-1 overall), Penn Manor (1-1 Section 1, 4-1 overall), Wilson (2-0 Section 1, 4-1 overall).

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  12 comments  Tags: Manheim Central High School · Cocalico High School · Manheim Township High School · Elco High School · Lancaster Catholic High School · Lancaster-Lebanon League · L-L Football Blog · Football

There are currently 12 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
Snakepit
10/4/09
1:36 PM
QUOTE (Lancaster Online @ Oct 4 2009, 02:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.



Manheim Township is a horrible pick for number 5. Wilson only lost to MC while TWP lost to RedLion. Wilson will take apart the Streaks and I think Penn Manor will knock them off as well.
Jeff VFPB
10/4/09
2:41 PM
QUOTE (Snakepit @ Oct 4 2009, 02:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Manheim Township is a horrible pick for number 5. Wilson only lost to MC while TWP lost to RedLion. Wilson will take apart the Streaks and I think Penn Manor will knock them off as well.



Like I say at the top of my rankings EVERY WEEK ... I do these FOR FUN. My rankings are anything but official, and I do them to get some teams and some kids some pub. That's it. I'm not even thinking about the Wilson/MT matchup - hopefully they're not either. But thanks for weighing in.
dc
10/4/09
5:37 PM
I have to agree with the snake. Wilson's only loss was to the top team on your rankings, and that went down to the wire. Also, Twp's loss is to a weaker team. I understand the whole "for fun" thing, but they should be a little more realistic.....
Jeff VFPB
10/4/09
7:37 PM
QUOTE (dc @ Oct 4 2009, 06:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have to agree with the snake. Wilson's only loss was to the top team on your rankings, and that went down to the wire. Also, Twp's loss is to a weaker team. I understand the whole "for fun" thing, but they should be a little more realistic.....



Rankings are based week-to-week ... don't really care about what happened in Week 3 or if someone lost to a 'weaker' team. Weaker team? Says who? And what's that based on? Overall record? District power points? Really liked what I saw out of Township on Friday, and wanted to get them in there. My rankings have changed pretty much every week, if you haven't noticed. Will always do these for fun ... no formulas, etc.
dc
10/4/09
7:45 PM
QUOTE (Jeff VFPB @ Oct 4 2009, 07:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Rankings are based week-to-week ... don't really care about what happened in Week 3 or if someone lost to a 'weaker' team. Weaker team? Says who? And what's that based on? Overall record? District power points? Really liked what I saw out of Township on Friday, and wanted to get them in there. My rankings have changed pretty much every week, if you haven't noticed. Will always do these for fun ... no formulas, etc.
I guess that I view these with a similar mind set as the ones that I see at PA Football, the H-burg Patriot, and the Pitts. Post Gazette. Guess that I will just change my mind set on this. Yours is more of a "flavor of the month" type ranking.....
Jeff VFPB
10/4/09
8:00 PM
QUOTE (dc @ Oct 4 2009, 08:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I guess that I view these with a similar mind set as the ones that I see at PA Football, the H-burg Patriot, and the Pitts. Post Gazette. Guess that I will just change my mind set on this. Yours is more of a "flavor of the month" type ranking.....



You got it! Flavor of the week ... I'm only concerned about LL teams ... those other media outlets that you mentioned can have their own rankings for the state. I just recognize the LL teams - week by week ... for fun :-)
Snakepit
10/4/09
8:35 PM
That's your call to choose who you like in your rankings but I can debate with you as well Jeff. As far as you saying "don't really care about what happened in Week 3 or if someone lost to a 'weaker' team. Weaker team? Says who? And what's that based on? "I'm surprised at you for making such a statement b/c you have seen MC several times ,you know what kind of team they are and then you question which team is a weaker one (Red Lion or MC) to lose to? That's just silly even if this blog is just "for fun."Jeff do you realize Twp only beat Ephrata 14-0. Ephrata hasn't won a game since when?Wilson is a traditional district 3 powerhouse while Twp is usually an afterthought. I would have like you to have put Pequea Valley in after they won over Fleetwood in your week 3 rankings. That was a feel good story to see them win with ex L-L stat Waltman as their coach.For fun here' my top 5 1)MC 2) Cocalico 3)Wilson 4) Lancaster Catholic 5)Conestoga Valley and at no additional price I will give you the Snake's top 15
6)Penn Manor7) Manheim Twp 8)L-S 9)Elco 10) Hempfield 11)Warwick 12)Solanco 13)Elizabethtown14) Reading 15)Pequea Valley and if you act now I'll give you my bottom feeders of the week.
dc
10/4/09
8:42 PM
QUOTE (Snakepit @ Oct 4 2009, 08:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That's your call to choose who you like in your rankings but I can debate with you as well Jeff. As far as you saying "don't really care about what happened in Week 3 or if someone lost to a 'weaker' team. Weaker team? Says who? And what's that based on? "I'm surprised at you for making such a statement b/c you have seen MC several times ,you know what kind of team they are and then you question which team is a weaker one (Red Lion or MC) to lose to? That's just silly even if this blog is just "for fun."Jeff do you realize Twp only beat Ephrata 14-0. Ephrata hasn't won a game since when?Wilson is a traditional district 3 powerhouse while Twp is usually an afterthought. I would have like you to have put Pequea Valley in after they won over Fleetwood in your week 3 rankings. That was a feel good story to see them win with ex L-L stat Waltman as their coach.For fun here' my top 5 1)MC 2) Cocalico 3)Wilson 4) Lancaster Catholic 5)Conestoga Valley and at no additional price I will give you the Snake's top 15
6)Penn Manor7) Manheim Twp 8)L-S 9)Elco 10) Hempfield 11)Warwick 12)Solanco 13)Elizabethtown14) Reading 15)Pequea Valley and if you act now I'll give you my bottom feeders of the week.
Snake, as much as I hate to do it, I am going to disagree with your top five. I see Wilson at two and Cocalico at three. I think if they meet head to head, Wilson wins this one. Also, as a Barons fan, I would much rather play Cocalico again than Wilson.....
Jeff VFPB
10/4/09
10:13 PM
QUOTE (dc @ Oct 4 2009, 08:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Snake, as much as I hate to do it, I am going to disagree with your top five. I see Wilson at two and Cocalico at three. I think if they meet head to head, Wilson wins this one. Also, as a Barons fan, I would much rather play Cocalico again than Wilson.....



Thanks for the friendly banter, y'all. By the end of the season, my rankings will all pan out; trust me. I just like to mix it up every week and recognize 'hot' teams. Of course Wilson is really good; no disputing that. I just happened to see Township last week, was impressed, and thought I'd give them some love. No harm, no foul. My rankings mean squat in the grand scheme of things - just like to do them for fun. I did I already mention that? Same thing with girls' basketball in the winter - just like to pick a top 5 every week. I appreciate the posts and your thoughts. Just don't hate me because of how I pick my 5 every week.
dc
10/5/09
11:41 AM
QUOTE (Jeff VFPB @ Oct 4 2009, 10:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thanks for the friendly banter, y'all. By the end of the season, my rankings will all pan out; trust me. I just like to mix it up every week and recognize 'hot' teams. Of course Wilson is really good; no disputing that. I just happened to see Township last week, was impressed, and thought I'd give them some love. No harm, no foul. My rankings mean squat in the grand scheme of things - just like to do them for fun. I did I already mention that? Same thing with girls' basketball in the winter - just like to pick a top 5 every week. I appreciate the posts and your thoughts. Just don't hate me because of how I pick my 5 every week.
It is all good. We do not hate you for any of your picks. Although, it helps that you have Central at the top......
Snakepit
10/5/09
1:11 PM
Jeff ,you have us all wrong. Just some friendly debate .Even if your picks do seem like you played one too many times without your helmet on.
dc
10/6/09
7:45 PM
QUOTE (Snakepit @ Oct 5 2009, 01:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Jeff ,you have us all wrong. Just some friendly debate .Even if your picks do seem like you played one too many times without your helmet on.
Ha Ha!! That is funny.....
View Topic | Comment on this blog