Enthusiasm and votes two separate things
September 4th, 2008 11:38 pm · 5 comments
I know this will get lost in the analysis of John McCain’s acceptance speech and local buzz about Barack Obama’s appearance, but think about this:
McCain spoke to about 18,000 in St. Paul, Minn.’s Xcel Center for his convention speech. On the same night, in the Republican stronghold of Lancaster County, an area U.S. Sen. Bob Casey Jr. said was the toughest place for Democrats to perform well in during elections, Obama drew 15,000 to Buchanan Park. Granted, the city is a bastion for progressive Democratic politics, but nonetheless …
One of the curiousities of this election, though, is how Obama’s meteoric rise and presence, which attracted 80,000 to his convention acceptance speech a week ago in Denver and draws huge crowds wherever he goes, hasn’t translated into huge victory margins among the polls of registered voters. Remember the eve of the Pennsylvania primary in April? Obama spoke to tens of thousands in Philadelphia, jammed places like the Lancaster train station with wildly enthusiastic crowds and U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton could only fill half the Zembo Shrine in Harrisburg, an area thought to be one of her strongholds. Clinton won 55 to 45 percent.
Is it closet racism? Is it voters find themselves uncomfortable with Obama’s experience when it actually comes to choosing him in the voting booth? One seasoned pollster has told me it’s incredibly difficult to quantify just why Obama has trouble translating these huge rallies into huge victory margins come election day, and it’s a wonder if that won’t continue on to Nov. 4.
Share and Enjoy:
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Tags: Presidential Politics · Barack Obama · John McCain · Hillary Clinton
There are currently 5 comments on this blog postView Topic | Comment on this blogusedmeat 9/5/08 12:07 AM | Of course the Obama supporters want you to think it's racism. It couldn't be that people would have doubts about St. Barack's ability to walk on water.
Let me address this racism thing. Hillary beat Obama 56% to 41% in Massachusetts.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles...w_their_limits/
QUOTE WASHINGTON - In 2006, Deval Patrick ran for governor of Massachusetts on what his consultant, David Axelrod, called "the politics of aspiration." Patrick talked about hope - a lot. And when people said they were just words, he quoted the Declaration of Independence to upbraid those who think words don't matter. He told voters "Yes, we can," and later, more broadly, "Together, we can."These words had a lot of power, as it turned out, propelling Patrick to a landslide. They echoed words that had been used by Barack Obama - also advised by Axelrod - in his record-setting Senate race in Illinois in 2004.
Last week, many voters in Massachusetts heard some of those words again at a massive rally for Obama's presidential campaign, joined by Patrick and the state's two senators, John Kerry and Ted Kennedy. But the next day, the people of Massachusetts went out and voted for the candidate of experience.
Deval Patrick is an empty suit foisted on the gullible public by David Axelrod. They weren't about to be fooled again.
In New Hampshire Hillary beat Obama 39.1% to 36.5% they knew about Patrick but not that much. New Hampshire is the place where the Obama campaign played the race card for the first time. They claimed the Bradely Effect as an excuse for their poor showing. It couldn't be New Hampshire Democrats were wise to the empty suit, they were all closet klansmen (and women).
When they mentioned the small crowd at the republican convention did they mention that there was doubt that one would be held and that depressed turn out? |
Rural Conservative 9/5/08 8:38 AM | When they mentioned the small crowd at the republican convention did they mention that there was doubt that one would be held and that depressed turn out?
Did they also mention the hordes of protesters and street violence?
What, no reports of riots in the streets of Lancaster yesterday? Intriguing.
Hey Dave, LNP's bias is showing yet again, and that 15,000 number seems to be over-inflated. |
davepidgeon 9/5/08 9:08 AM | The 15,000 figure comes from two separate sources: Lancaster City Police and Lancaster City Fire. Each gave separate estimates and both came in at 15,000. |
cyberscribbler 9/5/08 9:34 AM | The 15,000 estimate does not even include those of us who watched it on WGAL's live webstream of the event. |
Rural Conservative 9/5/08 9:45 AM | The 15,000 figure comes from two separate sources: Lancaster City Police and Lancaster City Fire. Each gave separate estimates and both came in at 15,000.
Maybe you should have checked with the Secret Service...Just sayin.
Like Lancaster City government agencies would have no reason to inflate their estimates? |
View Topic | Comment on this blog