Why the gas tax holiday is a bad idea

April 30th, 2008 8:55 pm · 4 comments

Jonathan Alter of Newsweek, whose columns consistently favor Obama, explains in detail tonight why the gas tax holiday supported by John McCain and Hillary Clinton is a bad idea. Among his reasons:

If the federal excise tax were lifted, oil companies would simply raise prices and pocket most of the difference …

It offers taxpayers only peanuts. The Congressional Budget Office says the average savings to motorists this summer would be a total of $30. Did I miss something, or was that measly number somehow not included in Clinton’s explanation of her support?

It makes it more likely you’ll have a car accident or will waste even more time in traffic. The proceeds from the gas tax go for highway construction and upgrades. Because the tax (24.4 cents a gallon on diesel fuel) was last raised 15 years ago, our infrastructure is a mess, with potholes and dangerous crossings practically everywhere. Thousands of repair projects will be further delayed.

It will cost 300,000 construction jobs, according to the Department of Transportation. Makes it kind of ironic when Clinton starts her rallies saying she wants “jobs, jobs, jobs.”

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists

  4 comments  Tags: Oil · Infrastructure · Taxes · Economy · President Barack Obama · Presidential Politics · Hillary Clinton

There are currently 4 comments on this blog post
View Topic | Comment on this blog
dragonrider
5/1/08
12:10 AM
QUOTE(Lancaster Online @ Apr 30 2008, 09:00 PM) [snapback]384269[/snapback]


Post your thoughts and comments about this blog post.


Freidman had a like editorial in the NY Times, his points were



The amount consumers will save is small.

We are borrowing from China to pay Saudi Arabia

Jobs will be lost in road construction

This adds nothing to our long term energy policy need

Instead we should invest in green energy so more energy is saved.



My own suggestion would be a one time tax deduction for those who would buy a new vehicle with gas millage over 35 mpg. This would help detroit and help our gas consuption.

jetscott
5/1/08
12:27 AM
people are more worried about what some wacko pastor says
Bigby_M
5/1/08
6:02 AM
How about this instead; Restrict commodities speculators to those who actually intend to take delivery of those commodities.

If you aren't in the oil business you can't drive up the price of oil for your own greed, and then pay a scant 15% tax on all that profit while working people pay twice that much in taxes, plus get stuck paying $4 a gallon because of the manipulation of oil prices by someone who isn't in the oil business, never intends to be in the oil business, and doesn't care about the oil business.



QUOTE(jetscott @ May 1 2008, 12:27 AM) [snapback]384355[/snapback]
people are more worried about what some wacko pastor says


No No No! He isn't some wacko who Republicans are expoiting because they have no ideas of their own other than stay the course set by President Wonderful.

Actually he is so disregard. laugh.gif

Bigmaclender2
5/1/08
7:24 AM
I wish that I still had my dad's moped. That thing got almost 80 miles to the gallon. Then I wouldn't have to give a rip...........

View Topic | Comment on this blog